Kuwait Times

Risky stalemate as science battles human fears at Japan nuke plant

-

ONAHAMA: More than six years after a tsunami overwhelme­d the Fukushima nuclear power plant, Japan has yet to reach consensus on what to do with a million tons of radioactiv­e water, stored on site in around 900 large and densely packed tanks that could spill should another major earthquake or tsunami strike. The stalemate is rooted in a fundamenta­l conflict between science and human nature. Experts advising the government have urged a gradual release to the nearby Pacific Ocean.

Treatment has removed all the radioactiv­e elements except tritium, which they say is safe in small amounts. Conversely, if the tanks break, their contents could slosh out in an uncontroll­ed way. Local fishermen are balking. The water, no matter how clean, has a dirty image for consumers, they say. Despite repeated tests showing most types of fish caught off Fukushima are safe to eat, diners remain hesitant. The fishermen fear any release would sound the death knell for their nascent and still fragile recovery. “People would shun Fukushima fish again as soon as the water is released,” said Fumio Haga, a dragnet fisherman from Iwaki, a city about 50 kilometers (30 miles) down the coast from the nuclear plant.

And so the tanks remain. Fall is high season for saury and flounder, among Fukushima’s signature fish. It was once a busy time of year when coastal fishermen were out every morning. Then came March 11, 2011. A 9 magnitude offshore earthquake triggered a tsunami that killed more than 18,000 people along Japan’s northeast coast. The quake and massive flooding knocked out power for the cooling systems at the Fukushima nuclear plant. Three of the six reactors had partial meltdowns. Radiation spewed into the air, and highly contaminat­ed water ran into the Pacific.

Today, only about half of the region’s 1,000 fishermen go out, and just twice a week because of reduced demand. They participat­e in a fish testing program. Lab technician­s mince fish samples at Onahama port in Iwaki, pack them in a cup for inspection and record details such as who caught the fish and where. Packaged fish sold at supermarke­ts carry official “safe” stickers. Only three kinds of fish passed the test when the experiment began in mid-2012, 15 months after the tsunami. Over time, that number has increased to about 100. The fish meet what is believed to be the world’s most stringent requiremen­t: less than half the radioactiv­e cesium level allowed under Japan’s national standard and one-twelfth of the US or EU limit, said Yoshiharu Nemoto, a senior researcher at the Onahama testing station. That message isn’t reaching consumers.

A survey by Japan’s Consumer Agency in October found that nearly half of Japanese weren’t aware of the tests, and that consumers are more likely to focus on alarming informatio­n about possible health impacts in extreme cases, rather than facts about radiation and safety standards. Fewer Japanese consumers shun fish and other foods from Fukushima than before, but one in five still do, according to the survey. The coastal catch of 2,000 tons last year was 8 percent of pre-disaster levels. The deepsea catch was half of what it used to be, though scientists say there is no contaminat­ion risk that far out. Naoya Sekiya, a University of Tokyo expert on disaster informatio­n and social psychology, said that the water from the nuclear plant shouldn’t be released until people are wellinform­ed about the basic facts and psychologi­cally ready. “A release only based on scientific safety, without addressing the public’s concerns, cannot be tolerated in a democratic society,” he said. “A release when people are unprepared would only make things worse.” He and consumer advocacy group representa­tive Kikuko Tatsumi sit on a government expert panel that has been wrestling with the social impact of a release and what to do with the water for more than a year, with no sign of resolution.

Tatsumi said the stalemate may be further fueling public misconcept­ion: Many people believe the water is stored because it’s not safe to release, and they think Fukushima fish is not available because it’s not safe to eat. The amount of radioactiv­e water at Fukushima is still growing, by 150 tons a day. —AP

 ??  ?? FUKUSHIMA: Tanks are seen at Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in Okuma. — AP
FUKUSHIMA: Tanks are seen at Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in Okuma. — AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Kuwait