Macau Daily Times

That report calls ‘dangerous and abusive’

- MDT/AP

of farmed shrimp from India to the U.S. in the past year, according to Importgeni­us trade data. Records show shipments went to major American seafood distributo­rs including AJC Internatio­nal Inc., Eastern Fish, Censea, Jetro Cash & Carry Enterprise­s, King & Prince Seafood, Red Chamber Co. and Rich Products Corp. Those companies, in turn, sell Indian shrimp under popular brand names including Costar, Good & Gather, Great Value and Mrs. Friday’s at supermarke­ts, box stores and restaurant­s across the U.S.

Importers that responded to requests for comment about possible labor abuses said they would investigat­e, with some suspending business in the meantime.

“We at Rich Products treat these allegation­s with the utmost seriousnes­s,” said the owners of frozen Seapak brand shrimp. “We are always fully prepared to investigat­e any allegation­s and take decisive corrective measures in response to any substantia­ted claims.”

DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMEN­T

Alongside a busy highway last month, men pulled nets of shrimp from shrimp ponds that had been dug into fields and mangroves, destroying critical ecosystems. Local villagers said the growing industry hasn’t just brought abusive working conditions, it’s also damaging their environmen­t.

The massive, murky ponds and their toxic algae, chemicals and sewage have made it impossible to grow crops and poisoned their water, they said. Investigat­ors from CAL say antibiotic use is widespread to control disease outbreaks. Antibiotic use in shrimp farming and other agricultur­e can lead to rising drug-resistant infections, a growing problem in the U.S.

“Essentiall­y, we feel lost,” said Areti Vasu, a farmer who said he was badly beaten and jailed during failed protests that sought to stop the developmen­t of a 57-acre shrimp processing and cold storage plant adjacent to his rice fields. “Our lives, our land, our farming pride, fresh air, and clean water – everything is lost. We are destined to live here in disgrace.”

Jonnalagar­uvu village vice president Koyya Sampath Rao initially helped build the massive facility, ignoring warnings from environmen­talists.

“Sadly their prediction­s came true,” he said. “Our water streams are now polluted, farmland is turning barren, yields are shrinking, and the night air is thick with pollutants.”

Official complaints about a lack of environmen­tal impact studies and coastal regulation violations have usually been dismissed by Indian authoritie­s.

Among the trucks being loaded with the shrimp at a pond in the village was one with a large sign: “Wellcome Kingwhite.” In the past year Wellcome shipped 3,800 tons of shrimp to the U.S., according to Importgeni­us trade data. The records show these include distributo­rs Great American Seafood Co., Pacific Coral Seafood and Ore-cal. The Great American Seafood Co. says on its website that it sells to dozens of food suppliers and supermarke­t chains, from Sysco and US Foods to Whole Foods and Winco Foods.

Sysco, the nation’s largest food distributo­r, has imported in the past from both Nekkanti and Wellcome. A spokespers­on said they stopped doing business with Wellcome in 2022 after the Indian firm “refused to allow us to conduct a required social responsibi­lity audit in their facility.” Wellcome did not respond to requests for comment.

The Sysco spokespers­on said the company suspended receipt of any products from Nekkanti after AP’S query this month, and would immediatel­y begin an investigat­ion.

Sysco “will continue to hold all its suppliers to the highest standards of labor and human rights,” the company said in a statement.

UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES

Most American consumers say they would rather buy U.s.-produced food. But with only 5% of shrimp sold in the U.S. caught there, shrimp from the U.S. can be harder to locate and considerab­ly more costly.

In the 1970s, the U.S. led the world in shrimp production. Shrimp was considered a delicacy. Diners were served expensive shrimp cocktails with less than a dozen shellfish harvested off the East, West and Gulf coasts.

Over the next two decades, the use of inexpensiv­e shrimp-farming technologi­es soared in Asia, and imports flooded the market. Today

in the U.S., where more than 5 pounds of shrimp per person is eaten per year, consumers expect all-you-can-eat shrimp buffets and $10 frozen bags at their markets.

There are a number of systems failing to prevent shrimp that is produced by forced labor or causes environmen­tal damage from arriving on Americans’ dinner tables.

For one, there is plenty of shrimp in the Gulf of Mexico, but U.S. fishing communitie­s have stricter, and more costly, labor and environmen­tal standards than their Asian counterpar­ts. Last year officials in the region sought financial relief, asking for state and federal declaratio­ns of a fishery disaster because they cannot compete with cheap imports that make up 95% of the market.

The request is pending. If approved, boat owners typically receive checks for a few thousand dollars, well below their losses.

“The many small, family-owned commercial shrimping businesses in Louisiana are facing an unpreceden­ted risk of collapse due to the devastatin­g impacts that large volumes of imported shrimp are having on domestic shrimp dockside prices,” said then-gov. John Bel Edwards last fall.

U.S. Customs and Border protection is responsibl­e for blocking imports of products produced with forced labor, and in recent years has prohibited imports of some cotton from China, gold from Democratic Republic of Congo, and sugar from the Dominican Republic. No products have been prohibited from India.

Eric Choy, executive director of CBP’S office of trade, said CBP does investigat­e allegation­s of abuse.

“You’d hope that there was a magic button that you can push and then everything created by forced labor is prohibited from entering, but it’s a much harder task,” he said. “It does require us to follow the trail.”

Last year, the FDA refused entry of 51 shrimp shipments citing antibiotic­s; 37 of those were shrimp exported from India.

The department­s of Labor and Commerce haven’t taken significan­t action, despite U.S. shrimpers’ complaints of unfair trade.

“For too long India has engaged in unfair trade practices causing economic damage to our domestic shrimp industry,” said Trey Pearson, president of the American Shrimp Processors Associatio­n.

U.S. firms rely on industry organizati­ons and auditors to make sure their shrimp imports are raised and processed in a safe, legal and environmen­tally responsibl­e way.

The National Fisheries Institute, America’s largest seafood trade associatio­n, works with seafood importers to improve working and environmen­tal conditions in shrimp farming.

“Any labor abuses in the value chain are abhorrent and they need to be addressed immediatel­y,” said NFI chief strategy officer Gavin Gibbons.

The Global Seafood Alliance’s Best Aquacultur­e Practice stamp of approval is on almost all Indian imports, certifying the supply chain meets their high standards.

“We take these matters very seriously,” the organizati­on said in an emailed statement.

CAL said the Best Aquacultur­e Practice certificat­ions are often performati­ve.

“Despite strong standards on paper, implementa­tion is often weak,” said the report.

SHRIMP WILL GROW IN A LAB, SAYS FISHERMAN

Fisherman and author Paul Greenberg said he sees a future where the shrimp Americans eat is neither wild caught nor farmed: it will grow in a lab. He said the science is underway to develop those products, and because shrimp isn’t flaky like fish, it should be an easier seafood to produce with living cells.

In the meantime, he’s been trying out vegan shrimp, “the shrimp that never died.” The texture is good, he said, and the sweetness impressive.

Human rights advocates say cost-cutting from U.S. supermarke­ts, restaurant­s and wholesaler­s squeeze producers to provide cheaper shrimp without addressing labor and environmen­tal conditions.

CAL says Indian companies need to pay living wages and abide by labor, health, safety and environmen­tal laws. In addition, the organizati­on says U.S. companies need to ensure that the price they pay for shrimp is enough for Indian exporters to treat workers equitably. And, they say, both the Indian and U.S. government­s need to enforce existing laws.

“The presence of widespread labor abuses and environmen­tal destructio­n in the Indian shrimp sector is undeniable,” said Allie Brudney, a CAL senior staff attorney. “U.S. restaurant­s and grocery stores need to purge these unethical practices from their supply chains.”

Ecologist Marla Valentine, who heads non-profit Oceana’s illegal fishing and transparen­cy campaign, said consumers can help.

“You can use your dollar to make a difference,” she said. “When this isn’t a lucrative business anymore, it will stop.”

It has worked in the past, she said.

“Thailand has been called out for labor abuses many times, particular­ly regarding shrimp, and we are seeing the seafood industry and the Thai government really try to make some of those changes,” she said. “They are answering the market power, so it shows that change can happen.”

 ?? ?? A worker peels shrimp in a tin-roofed processing shed in the hamlet of Tallarevu, in Kakinada district, in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, last February
A worker peels shrimp in a tin-roofed processing shed in the hamlet of Tallarevu, in Kakinada district, in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, last February
 ?? ?? Erugala Baby, 51, widowed and destitute, wipes tears from her eyes during an interview at her residence in Bhogapuram, Kakinada district, Andhra Pradesh
Erugala Baby, 51, widowed and destitute, wipes tears from her eyes during an interview at her residence in Bhogapuram, Kakinada district, Andhra Pradesh

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Macau