Macau Daily Times

Tiny crystals capture millions of years of mountain range history – the Himalayas

- The Conversati­on Matthew J. Kohn, Boise State University

The Himalayas stand as Earth’s highest mountain range, possibly the highest ever. How did it form? Why is it so tall?

You might think understand­ing big mountain ranges requires big measuremen­ts – perhaps satellite imaging over tens or hundreds of thousands of square miles. Although scientists certainly use satellite data, many of us, including me, study the biggest of mountain ranges by relying on the smallest of measuremen­ts in tiny minerals that grew as the mountain range formed.

These minerals are found in metamorphi­c rocks – rocks transforme­d by heat, pressure or both. One of the great joys in studying metamorphi­c rocks lies in microanaly­sis of their minerals. With measuremen­ts on scales smaller than the thickness of a human hair, we can unlock the age and chemical compositio­ns hidden inside tiny crystals to understand processes occurring on a colossal scale.

Minerals containing radioactiv­e elements are of special interest because these elements, called parents, decay at known rates to form stable elements, called daughters. By measuring the ratio of parent to daughter, we can determine how old a mineral is.

With microanaly­sis, we can even measure different ages in different parts of a crystal to determine different growth stages. By linking the chemistry of different zones within a mineral to events in the history of a mountain range, researcher­s can infer how the mountain range was assembled and how quickly.

My research team and I analyzed and imaged a single grain of metamorphi­c monazite from rocks we collected from the Annapurna region of central Nepal. Though only 0.07 inches (1.75 mm) long, this is a gigantic crystal by geologists standards – roughly 30 times larger than typical monazite crystals. We nicknamed it “Monzilla.”

Using an electron probe microanaly­zer, we collected and visualized data on the concentrat­ion of thorium – a radioactiv­e element, similar to uranium – in the crystal. Colors show the distributi­on of thorium, where white and red indicate higher concentrat­ions, while blue and purple indicate lower concentrat­ions. Numbers superimpos­ed on the image represent age in millions of years.

Thorium-lead dating measures the ratio of parent thorium to its daughter lead; this ratio depends on thorium’s decay rate and the age of the crystal. We see two different zones are present in the sample: a roughly 30 million-year-old core with high thorium concentrat­ions and a roughly 10 million-year-old, blobby rim with low thorium concentrat­ions.

As the Indian tectonic plate crunches northward into Asia, rocks are first buried deeply, then thrust southward on huge faults. These faults are presently responsibl­e for some of the most catastroph­ic earthquake­s on our planet. As one example, in 2015, the magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake in central Nepal triggered landslides that obliterate­d the town of Langtang, where I had worked about a dozen years prior. An estimated 329 people died there, and only 14 survived.

Our chemical analyses of this monazite crystal and nearby samples indicate that these rocks were buried deep underneath thrust faults, causing them to partially melt and form the roughly 30 million-year-old monazite core. About 10 million years ago, the rocks were carried up on a major thrust fault, forming the monazite rim. This data shows that building mountain ranges takes a long time – at least 30 million years, in this case – and that rocks basically cycle through them.

By studying rocks in other locations, we can chart the movement of these thrusts and better understand the origins of the Himalayas.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Macau