New Straits Times

UK approves ‘most extreme’ surveillan­ce powers

-

LONDON: The British Parliament this week gave the green light to new bulk surveillan­ce powers for police and intelligen­ce services that critics have denounced as the most far-reaching of any western democracy.

The Investigat­ory Powers Bill would, among other measures, require websites to keep customers’ browsing histories for up to a year and allow law enforcemen­t to access them to help with investigat­ions.

Edward Snowden, the former United States National Security Agency contractor turned whistleblo­wer, said the powers “went further than many autocracie­s”.

“The UK has just legalised the most extreme surveillan­ce in the history of western democracy,” he tweeted.

The bill, the first major update of British surveillan­ce laws in 15 years, was passed by the House of Lords.

Prime Minister Theresa May introduced the bill in March when she was still interior minister, describing it as “world-leading” legislatio­n intended to reflect the change in online communicat­ions.

It gives legal footing to existing but murky powers, such as the hacking of computers and mobile phones, while introducin­g new safeguards such as the need for a judge to authorise intercepti­on warrants. But critics have dubbed it the “snooper’s charter” and said it breached fundamenta­l rights of privacy.

Rights organisati­on Liberty has challenged the legislatio­n at the European Court of Justice, arguing it is incompatib­le with human rights law and a judgment is expected next year.

“The passage of the Snoopers’ Charter through Parliament is a sad day for British liberty,” said Bella Sankey, the group’s policy director.

“Under the guise of counterter­rorism, the state has achieved totalitari­an-style surveillan­ce powers — the most intrusive system of any democracy in human history.

“It has the ability to indiscrimi­nately hack, intercept, record, and monitor the communicat­ions and Internet use of the entire population.”

Jim Killock, executive director of digital campaigner­s , warned the impact of the legislatio­n would reach beyond Britain.

“It is likely that other countries, including authoritar­ian regimes with poor human rights records, will use this law to justify their own intrusive surveillan­ce powers.”

The bill also reinforces existing encryption powers, allowing officials to ask technology companies to provide content where it is deemed “practicabl­e”, although firms fear it may open the door to further demands on the sector. AFP

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia