New Straits Times

‘Inaccurate to raise case as Islamic finance issue’

-

DUBAI: Nothing in Islamic finance or the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) laws regarding syariahcom­pliant debt has changed since Dana Gas PJSC restructur­ed its sukuk four years ago.

“What makes the sukuk illegal now?” asked Rizwan Kanji, a partner at law firm King & Spalding LLP.

When the gas producer started negotiatio­ns with creditors in 2012, the issue relating to mudarabah structures was “clear and settled”, said Kanji.

Since then, there had been no changes in Islamic finance or related UAE laws, so if the company’s claims that its US$700 million (RM3 billion) bonds were illegal now, then they were illegal when they were issued, he said.

Dana Gas said last week it no longer considered its two securities syariah-compliant under the UAE law. A court in Sharjah has since barred bondholder­s from taking any action against Dana Gas until it reviews the company’s applicatio­n to declare its debt “unlawful and unenforcea­ble”.

Dana Gas was also granted an additional injunction from High Court of Justice in the British Virgin Islands on June 13, according to another statement.

The company has filed a preemptive suit in the High Court of Justice in London “to protect its interests against any hostile action” by sukuk holders.

The following are highlights from an interview with Kanji:

What’s the controvers­y?

“It was in 2007 that Sheikh Muhammad Taqi Usmani, an Islamic scholar who was chairman of AAOIFI (a Bahrain-based institutio­n that issues syariahcom­pliant accounting and auditing rules), indicated that Islamic equity structures, such as mudarabah, can’t be used to build fixed-income instrument­s where the profit payments and principal were guaranteed.

“It’s fair to say that mudarabah structures for fixed-income deals stopped after 2007, except that they were and continue to be used in equity-like sukuk, such as Tier I offerings by financial institutio­ns and similar hybrid securities by companies.”

Can you explain the

difference?

“Sukuk can be either debt-like or equity-like. Historical­ly and particular­ly pre-2007, the mudarabah Islamic structure was utilised in structurin­g fixedincom­e like issuances, where the profit component and principal amount to an extent was guaranteed, irrespecti­ve of the performanc­e of the underlying mudarabah

assets.”

Is Dana Gas’s sukuk illegal

according to UAE law?

“It is well-establishe­d that where UAE law contains specific provisions and codes, local courts will give effect to that provision. In the absence of any UAE law, would provision then turn to a syariah court? The point by the company suggests that all convention­al banking and interestbe­aring financing in the UAE would be illegal if the nation’s laws don’t address them specifical­ly, because they don’t comply with syariah principles.

“Dana Gas is understand­ably trying to restructur­e the commercial terms, but it’s extremely unfortunat­e and inaccurate that a credit and restructur­ing issue is being wrapped and presented as an Islamic finance issue.” Bloomberg

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia