New Straits Times

Readying to face new digital frontiers

-

THE nature of competitiv­eness constantly evolves, affecting not only how businesses function but how countries perform today and will perform in the future. Economies are experienci­ng more rapid technologi­cal changes than in the past.

The landscape of current capabiliti­es and future prospects is changing swiftly and this poses a significan­t challenge for the IMD World Competitiv­eness Ranking as it seeks to capture developmen­ts and benchmark the performanc­e of the 63 nations it analyses.

Every edition of the IMD World Competitiv­eness Ranking incorporat­es new indicators to better reflect the competitiv­eness of countries. There are times, however, when a more drastic approach is required and the introducti­on of a new ranking is necessary.

The IMD World Competitiv­eness Centre thus deemed it fundamenta­l to develop a new analytical framework to assess the state of digital affairs.

It created the IMD World Digital Competitiv­eness Ranking, which is much more focused and assesses the capabiliti­es and readiness of economies to undertake the process of digital transforma­tion.

Government­s around the world are investing in scientific and technologi­cal infrastruc­ture to keep up with the possibilit­ies of the digital economy and enhance the prosperity of their citizens.

While technologi­cal developmen­t is a necessary condition for the future well-being of an economy, it is not sufficient to augment value creation.

Digital technology needs not only to be implemente­d, it needs to be explored to achieve two important goals — to improve efficiency and enhance the range and the quality of services.

Digital competitiv­eness is defined as the capacity of an economy to adopt and explore digital technologi­es leading to the transforma­tion in government practices, business models and society in general.

The innovative capacity of a country is heavily rooted in areas such as the concentrat­ion of scientists and engineers in the workforce, the degree of protection of intellectu­al property and the depth of cooperatio­n among the public, private and academic sectors.

In the existing overall Competitiv­eness Ranking, these act as proxies for scientific and technologi­cal innovation. The new ranking complement­s the overall ranking by fostering a better understand­ing of the forces related to the digital economy as well as the latter’s contributi­on to country performanc­e.

Technologi­cal transforma­tion is gradual, requiring shifts at the organisati­onal, institutio­nal and structural levels. Organisati­ons need to be able to recognise, communicat­e and assume the challenges brought about by the emergence of new technologi­es.

Institutio­ns must further their “openness and flexibilit­y” to adapt to transforma­tions and readjust relevant rules, regulation­s, norms and beliefs.

Finally, the structural level is the degree of “permeabili­ty of research, production, market, and demand conditions” in encouragin­g innovation, the developmen­t of new products, the emergence of new markets and the entry of new actors into relevant sectors according to Ulrich Dolata’s 2009 paper on technologi­cal innovation­s and

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia