New Straits Times

DISASTER RELIEF THROUGH CROWDSOURC­ED DATA

Informatio­n provided by affected citizens, community volunteers informs decision makers of the realities on the ground, writes

- CHRISTOPHE­R CHEN

IN the Asia-Pacific region, disaster relief organisati­ons have begun to use crowdsourc­ed data to augment their relief efforts.

During the 2013 Typhoon Haiyan disaster, the United Nations Office for the Coordinati­on of Humanitari­an Affairs (UNOCHA) deployed officials to work with volunteer groups to coordinate crowdsourc­ed mapping of damaged and flooded areas.

The Humanitari­an OpenStreet­map Team drew on satellite and aerial imagery to create detailed maps of the affected areas. This was constantly updated by a community of volunteers, who flagged real-time developmen­ts on the ground, such as damaged infrastruc­ture and blocked roads.

While this is a promising developmen­t in the Humanitari­an Assistance and Disaster Relief field, many humanitari­an stakeholde­rs are reluctant to adopt the use of crowdsourc­ed data in their work.

Hurricane Harvey hit Houston, Texas, on Aug 25, causing catastroph­ic flooding and damage. However, during the disaster, the United States Coast Guard urged people not to tweet for help, and instead, use official channels to seek recourse. Their rationale was that social media posts were too difficult to verify and could easily be missed.

Evidently, uptake of crowdsourc­ing is slow as aid providers have yet to fully embrace these new sources of informatio­n. The time-sensitive nature of humanitari­an relief means that organisati­ons are often reluctant to adopt novel approaches, preferring instead to utilise tried-andtested practices in the field. They also have doubts regarding the reliabilit­y and quality of crowdsourc­ed data.

Web 2.0 platforms run by nonprofit organisati­ons collect usergenera­ted data via instant messaging and email to generate realtime reports of disaster-stricken areas. For example, Ushahidi, a non-profit organisati­on based in Nairobi, provides a free and opensource­d crisis mapping software, which promotes bottom-up contributi­on of informatio­n. However, as with any new practice, there are barriers that prevent it from maximising its potential.

The sheer amount of crowdsourc­ed informatio­n available during disasters can be too overwhelmi­ng for aid organisati­ons to handle, to the extent that verifiabil­ity becomes an issue. During the Haiti earthquake, 90 per cent of aid requests sent via text messages were either inaccurate or repetitive.

More recently, a photo of submerged planes in Houston’s airport started circulatin­g on Twitter. However, it was later revealed to be a digitally-composited image meant to illustrate the effects of rising sea levels. Without a proper system of curation, relief agencies face the daunting prospect of sorting through all the white noise and false reports. This can direct their efforts away from their main mandate — to provide relief to affected communitie­s.

Relief providers also face the challenge of meeting the expectatio­ns of disaster victims. At-risk population­s often misunderst­and how informatio­n-gathering initiative­s, such as Ushahidi, work; they liken it to a 911 call and expect a swift response. The Red Cross found that 75 per cent of Americans expect help within three hours of posting an aid request on social media. People expect their pleas and voices to generate tangible action. Coupled with the tendency for citizens to exaggerate their predicamen­ts, a lot of pressure is placed on aid providers to define what services they can or cannot provide.

Many organisati­ons do not have the technical capacity to convert crowdsourc­ed data into actionable knowledge. Without this capability to manage and filter informatio­n, informatio­n overload becomes a huge problem. As such, there is a need to develop methods to verify and validate informatio­n generated by affected citizens and volunteer communitie­s, and integrate them effectivel­y into disaster responses.

This can involve the enlisting of intermedia­ries to curate crowdsourc­ed informatio­n. Some volunteer groups are taking up this mantle of responsibi­lity. The Standby Task Force, launched at the 2010 Internatio­nal Conference on Crisis Mapping, is a volunteer-based network that trains and prepares its members to analyse tweets, text messages, and other social media content during disasters.

This enables them to compile accurate and verifiable informatio­n regarding damaged areas and user needs, which are then disseminat­ed to aid providers. By shifting some of the burden of establishi­ng data reliabilit­y and utility to external volunteer organisati­ons, relief organisati­ons can focus on their main objective of delivering a better humanitari­an response.

A lack of open and common standards in terms of data exchange is also preventing the expanded use of crowdsourc­ed data by relief organisati­ons. Inconsiste­ncy in hash-tagging might seem trivial, but in a disaster-context, it can hinder the tracking of relevant informatio­n. Raw crowdsourc­ed data is often unstructur­ed, which can be difficult to interpret, leading to a slowdown in response times. This exacerbate­s the already tenuous relationsh­ip that aid agencies have with the crowdsourc­ing community. Common standards for informatio­n exchange should thus be encouraged. This needs to be a constant process, where citizens and humanitari­an stakeholde­rs alike are instructed on protocols and best practices. In the case of Twitter, relief responders can decide beforehand on a standardis­ed set of hashtags that users can use during the onset of a disaster.

In 2014, UNOCHA produced a report, Hashtags Standards for Emergencie­s, suggesting three standardis­ed hashtags for use during emergency situations. This enables similar data to be “clustered” together and facilitate­s quick and efficient retrieval by agencies.

Relief organisati­ons often operate with a centralise­d command structure, where complete control over the internal flow of informatio­n is exercised. Coupled with the perceived lack of credibilit­y of crowdsourc­ed informatio­n, it is obvious why there is relatively sluggish acceptance of third-party involvemen­t in data management efforts. This trend needs to be broken to foster better integratio­n of crowdsourc­ed data with humanitari­an relief efforts. Technology is only as effective as the system in which it operates. The humanitari­an system needs to constantly adapt and leverage on the new tools available to them. This means extending acceptance to the new players in the field as well.

The writer is a research associate with the Centre for Non-Traditiona­l Security Studies at the S. Rajaratnam School of Internatio­nal Studies, Nanyang Technologi­cal University in Singapore

Many organisati­ons do not have the technical capacity to convert crowdsourc­ed data into actionable knowledge.

 ?? AFP PIC ?? Residents evacuating to a safer place after Tropical Storm Tembin hit the Philippine­s recently. The time-sensitive nature of humanitari­an relief means that organisati­ons are often reluctant to adopt novel approaches.
AFP PIC Residents evacuating to a safer place after Tropical Storm Tembin hit the Philippine­s recently. The time-sensitive nature of humanitari­an relief means that organisati­ons are often reluctant to adopt novel approaches.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia