New Straits Times

‘BAN IS UNCONSTITU­TIONAL’

Huawei argues US moratorium on its equipment denies it of a fair trial

-

HUAWEI Technologi­es Co has asked a United States judge to rule that a ban on federal agencies and contractor­s buying its gear violates the constituti­on, delivering its latest legal riposte to American accusation­s it aids Beijing in espionage.

China’s largest technology company asked for summary judgment in a filing late on Tuesday, arguing the moratorium on its equipment disrupted existing contracts, stigmatise­d Huawei and its employees as “tools” of the Chinese government, and threatened its ability to do business in the US.

Huawei, which has warned that the ban could kill the company, has repeatedly denied those allegation­s.

The Trump administra­tion has also blackliste­d the Chinese company, cutting off the supply of American components it needs to make its smartphone­s and networking gear.

In challengin­g the ban, Huawei argues it’s unconstitu­tional to single out a person or a group for penalty without a fair trial.

It’s taking aim at a provision in the 2019 National Defence Authorisat­ion Act that bars any executive agency, government contractor or company that receives a government loan or grant from using Huawei equipment, according to its complaint.

The firm argues that the provision is a bill of attainder, a legislativ­e punishment without trial that’s prohibited by the US Constituti­on.

The ban “adjudicate­s Huawei to be a tool of the Chinese government, imposes vast restrictio­ns on it, and burdens its constituti­onal rights,” said Huawei.

Huawei’s suit signals a more aggressive response from the firm towards its US accusers, who have been trying to persuade other countries to ban Huawei gear.

Banning the firm “will do nothing to make networks more secure.

“They provide a false sense of security, and distract attention from the real challenges we face”, said Song Liuping, Huawei’s chief legal officer, repeating arguments laid out in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece.

“This sets a dangerous precedent. Today it’s telecoms and Huawei. Tomorrow it could be your industry, your firm, your consumers.”

 ?? REUTERS PIC ?? Huawei argues that it is not constituti­onal to single out a person or a group for penalty without a fair trial.
REUTERS PIC Huawei argues that it is not constituti­onal to single out a person or a group for penalty without a fair trial.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia