Haul Jho Low to court, urges Shafee
Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s defence team yesterday called for 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB)-linked fugitive businessman Low Taek Jho, or Jho Low, to be produced as soon as possible.
Counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah said Low should be brought to court immediately to help determine the truth in the former prime minister’s case.
“The inspector-general of police (IGP) said, not more than a month ago, that they (the police) know exactly where Jho Low is.
“The prime minister and deputy prime minister said they must get Jho Low.
“I would like to invite Jho Low to be produced as soon as possible so we can determine the truth,” he said.
Shafee, who is the lead counsel for Najib, said this when submitting on “hearsay” evidence in the testimony of former 1MDB chief executive officer (CEO) Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi.
Shahrol, 49, who took the stand on Monday as the ninth prosecution witness in Najib’s trial involving the misappropriation of RM2.3 billion in 1MDB funds, had described the close relationship between the former prime minister and Low.
To this, Shafee said it was all “hearsay” since nobody could prove what the witness said since Low was not around.
He submitted that hearsay evidence in general could not be admissible unless Low was called to court.
“Natural justice is totally removed because I have no chance of cross-examining Jho Low,” Shafee said.
He said whatever Shahrol heard from Low may not be the truth as the eighth witness, Datuk Amhari Efendi Nazaruddin, who was Najib’s former special officer, in his testimony had labelled Low as a “master manipulator”.
“Why must we accept his (Low) words when he manipulated the entire event: Terengganu Investment Authority, 1MDB, and in fact, the (former) prime minister himself ?”
To rebut the defence, lead prosecutor Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram said the prosecution was entitled to show that Najib was not and could not have been misled by Low.
He recalled Amhari’s testimony that Najib did not make any adverse response or appeared surprised at all when informed of Low’s instructions through a draft of a letter.
“This is conduct accompanying the words spoken by Jho Low.”
Sri Ram said the cases the defence relied on in their submissions were inapplicable to the fact pattern of the current case, which he described as unique.
He said this was because the accused was not an ordinary person but the prime minister and the most powerful person in the country (when the alleged offences were committed).
“For those reasons, we respectfully submit that what Shahrol and Amhari said, how they acted upon Jho Low’s statements, how they verified with the accused and the accused’s state of mind and Jho Low’s are all relevant,” he said, adding that it was circumstantial evidence.
High Court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah reserved his judgment. Trial continues with Shahrol taking the stand.