The Borneo Post (Sabah)

A mostly CGI ‘Jungle Book’ leaps off screen — to dazzling effect

- By Ann Hornaday

PANTHERS and bears. Oh, my.

The beloved 1967 Disney cartoon classic “The Jungle Book” takes on a dazzling liveaction-ish life in Jon Favreau’s adaptation, a visual wonderment of colour, texture, movement and spectacula­r animal life. Brought to the screen with computerge­nerated animation, the Indian jungle of Rudyard Kipling’s original stories glimmers and shines here, with each fern frond and dappled glade enticing the viewer further into its primal depths. (Think “Babe” meets “The Life of Pi” meets “Avatar.”)

The ethic of exacting detail extends especially to the charismati­c mammals who populate the river banks, mangroves and monkey kingdoms of a land that looks enchanted and startlingl­y real. Whether it’s the sleek, glistening coat of the panther Bagheera (voiced by Ben Kingsley) or each individual hair painstakin­gly undulating on a she-wolf and her pups, every inch of “The Jungle Book” pulses with life, grace and authentici­ty. Even when this idyllic world turns ugly, it’s a thing of rare beauty.

That even goes for Shere Khan (Idris Elba), the wounded, perpetuall­y enraged tiger and arch villain of the film, who makes it his life work to hunt down a little boy named Mowgli, who has been raised by wolves since he was abandoned in the tigers and jungle as a baby. Played by Neel Sethi, the only human being seen in “The Jungle Book,” Mowgli is an ecstatical­ly dirty, feral child, given to howling with his canine brothers and competing with his protector, Bagheera, on swooping foot-races through the tree-tops.

When Shere Khan sets his threatenin­g sights on Mowgli — convinced that the child will grow into a destructiv­e, marauding adult — it’s decided that Mowgli should return to his “own kind,” a journey fraught with untold physical and psychic dangers. (Like “Zooptopia,” “The Jungle Book” posits the animal kingdom as a peaceable metaphor for pluralism and tolerance from which homo sapiens know-it-alls have much to learn.)

Filmed with dynamism and propulsive, energetic flair, “The Jungle Book” allows viewers the vicarious pleasure of sidling up to magnificen­t (sometimes mangy) beasts as if they were household pets. Even when the movie takes on the episodic, repetitive contours of a typical chase film — including some genuinely terrifying fight sequences and a couple of potentiall­y upsetting deaths — the visual environmen­t is so marvellous­ly transporti­ng that plot barely matters.

Fans of the 1967 cartoon will be waiting for their favourite characters to show up, which they do, complete with musical numbers. In the midst of an otherwise traumatisi­ng story, Bill Murray provides his signature, slightly snide comic relief as the honey-loving bear Baloo (so realistic here he looks freshly imported from the “Revenant” set), while Christophe­r Walken seems to channel both Marlon Brando and Louis Prima as King Louie, a regal, copper-colored gigantopit­hecus.

Of course, in the earlier film, Louie was just an orangutan. But everything’s bigger and brighter and more believable in this iteration of “The Jungle Book,” which derives much of its pleasure from the silky vocal performanc­es of Kingsley, Elba, Lupita Nyong’o, Scarlett Johansson and a heartrendi­ng posthumous turn by Garry Shandling.

Like all classic Disney production­s, “The Jungle Book” possesses its share of fear, suffering and loss. But somehow the audience comes out whistling — in this case, with joy and quite a bit of awe.

Three and a half stars. Rated PG. Contains sequences of scary action and peril. 106 minutes. — WP-Bloomberg

 ??  ?? Mowgli (left) and Bagheera in ‘The Jungle Book’. — Photo courtesy of Walt Disney Pictures
Mowgli (left) and Bagheera in ‘The Jungle Book’. — Photo courtesy of Walt Disney Pictures

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia