Rise of Markle — from most Googled actress to royalty
AFTER more than a year of social media speculation, gossipy headlines and rampant rumours, it’s finally official: Meghan Markle will marry Prince Harry in the spring.
The royal palace made the highly-anticipated announcement on Monday morning, confirming that the couple became engaged in London earlier this month, and will live together at Nottingham Cottage, Harry’s home at Kensington Palace.
Clarence House tweeted “The Prince of Wales is delighted to announce the engagement of Prince Harry to Ms Meghan Markle.”
It’s all been a bit of a whirlwind for Markle, who sent the Internet into a Google-frenzy in October 2016 when tabloids broke the news that the American-born actress appeared to be Prince Harry’s new girlfriend.
Who is Meghan Markle? asked seemingly everybody, and the answer was perfectly charming: Before she made headlines as the love interest of a royal family member, Markle had established herself as an actress and star of the USA legal drama “Suits,” as well as a vocal humanitarian who served as a UN Women’s Advocate for gender equality and a global ambassador for World Vision. She founded a lifestyle blog called The Tig in 2014, and attracted a robust following with posts about political and social issues, food, and travel. Her Instagram feed was filled with aesthetically flawless images of her home, the “Suits” set, and her two rescued dogs, Bogart and Guy.
But news of Markle’s blossoming relationship with Prince Harry drew plenty of vicious criticism nonetheless, as she didn’t quite fit the typical archetype of a would-be princess: Markle is American, born and raised in Los Angeles. She is older than Harry. She is biracial, with an African-American mother and white father. And she’s been divorced (fans of “The Crown” will recall that, where prospective royal spouses are concerned, a previous divorce has historically been frowned upon).
The onslaught of racist and sexist attacks on Markle was intense enough to prompt a rare response from Kensington Palace, which came to her defence in a prepared statement in November 2016:
“Prince Harry is worried about Ms Markle’s safety and is deeply disappointed that he has not been able to protect her. It is not right that a few months into a relationship with him that Ms Markle should be subjected to such a storm,” the statement said. “He knows commentators will say this is ‘the price she has to pay’ and that ‘this is all part of the game.’ He strongly disagrees. This is not a game - it is her life and his.”
Beyond presenting a strong rebuke of Markle’s treatment by the tabloid media, the statement also offered official confirmation of the blossoming relationship, which immediately fuelled more rumours about if and when an engagement might be expected.
And for royal watchers, there were certainly plenty of tantalising clues.
In December 2016, a “palace source” told Us Weekly that a spring 2017 engagement seemed likely (off by a few months, as it turns out). Markle bid farewell to her lifestyle blog, and reportedly planned to depart the cast of “Suits.” Rumours circulated that Markle was preparing to move from Toronto to London. Daily Mail columnist Richard Kay wrote last month that Markle and Harry had visited Buckingham Palace for a private meeting with Queen Elizabeth, Harry’s grandmother.
Amid a rush of speculative headlines last week, Palace officials remained unsurprisingly - mum. But on Friday, a major London bookmaker offered yet one more hint that an engagement was likely, if in fact it hadn’t happened already: Ladbrokes said that it would no longer accept bets on a 2018 royal wedding, adding that it seemed an engagement announcement “is to be confirmed imminently,” according to the Associated Press.
Monday’s announcement swiftly consumed social media, with Markle’s name once again trending on Twitter, alongside “Prince Harry,” “Harry and Meghan” and #Royalengagement. The couple’s names ranked among the top trending Google searches, and in response to one common question - what will Markle’s title be? - the British press reported that the actress will likely soon be officially known as the “Duchess of Sussex” (per royal tradition, the queen is anticipated to bestow the title of “Duke of Sussex” upon Harry on the couple’s wedding day).
The palace announced that the pair would pose for photos outside Kensington Palace Monday afternoon, and give a broadcast interview Monday evening. More details about the wedding venue and timing are expected to follow this week, the Guardian reported.
Fans and followers of the royal family will now have months to ponder the upcoming nuptials - What will she wear? Who will be invited? - as the bride-tobe prepares for her new role, one that will grant her an even more prominent platform for the philanthropic work that has always been a priority for her and Harry. Last year, Markle wrote an essay for Elle magazine about the challenge of balancing the glitz and glamour of Hollywood with her commitment to humanitarian work:
“Reflecting on where I came from helps me to appreciate and balance what I have now,” she wrote, adding that her hardworking parents emphasised a sense of compassion and responsibility. “With fame comes opportunity, but it also includes responsibility - to advocate and share, to focus less on glass slippers and more on pushing through glass ceilings. And, if I’m lucky enough, to inspire.”
Markle had established herself as an actress and star of the USA legal drama ‘Suits,’ as well as a vocal humanitarian who served as a UN Women’s Advocate for gender equality and a global ambassador for World Vision.