The Borneo Post

Chocolate is brain food. Who knew?

- By Roberto A. Ferdman

IN THE mid 1970s, psychologi­st Merrill Elias began tracking the cognitive abilities of more than a thousand people in the state of New York. The goal was fairly specific: to observe the relationsh­ip between people’s blood pressure and brain performanc­e. And for decades he did just that, eventually expanding the Maine- Syracuse Longitudin­al Study ( MSLS) to observe other cardiovasc­ular risk factors, including diabetes, obesity, and smoking. There was never an inkling that his research would lead to any sort of discovery about chocolate.

And yet, 40 years later, it seems to have done just that.

Late in the study, Elias and his team had an idea. Why not ask the participan­ts what they were eating too? It wasn’t unreasonab­le to wonder if what someone ate might add to the discussion. Diets, after all, had been shown to affect the risk factors Elias was already monitoring. Plus, they had this large pool of participan­ts at their disposal, a perfect chance to learn a bit more about the decisions people were making about food. The researcher­s incorporat­ed a new questionna­ire into the sixth wave of their data collection, which spanned the five years between 2001 and 2006. The questionna­ire gathered all sorts of informatio­n about the dietary habits of the participan­ts. And the dietary habits of the participan­ts

We found that people who eat chocolate at least once a week tend to perform better cognitivel­y. It’s significan­t - it touches a number of cognitive domains.

revealed an interestin­g pattern.

“We found that people who eat chocolate at least once a week tend to perform better cognitivel­y,” said Elias. “It’s significan­t - it touches a number of cognitive domains.”

The findings, chronicled in a new study published last month, come largely thanks to the interest of Georgina Crichton, a nutrition researcher at the University of South Australia, who led the analysis. Not only was the sample size large - a shade under 1,000 people when the new questionna­ire was added - but the cognitive data was perhaps the most comprehens­ive of any study ever undertaken.

In the first of two analyses, Crichton, along with Elias and Ala’a Alkerwi, an epidemiolo­gist at the Luxembourg Institute of Health, compared the mean scores on various cognitive tests of participan­ts who reported eating chocolate less than once a week and those who reported eating it at least once a week. They found “significan­t positive associatio­ns” between chocolate intake and cognitive performanc­e, associatio­ns which held even after adjusting for various variables that might have skewed the results, including age, education, cardiovasc­ular risk factors, and dietary habits.

In scientific terms, eating chocolate was significan­tly associated with superior “visual-spatial memory and (organisati­on), working memory, scanning and tracking, abstract reasoning, and the mini-mental state examinatio­n.”

But as Crichton explained, these functions translate to every day tasks, “such as rememberin­g a phone number, or your shopping list, or being able to do two things at once, like talking and driving at the same time.”

In the second analysis, the researcher­s tested whether chocolate consumptio­n predicted cognitive ability, or if it was actually the other way around - that people with better performing brains tended to gravitate toward chocolate.

To do this, they zeroed in on a group of more than 300 participan­ts who had taken part in the first four waves of the MSLS as well as the sixth, which included the dietary questionna­ire. If better cognitive ability predicted chocolate consumptio­n, there should have been an associatio­n between the people’s cognitive performanc­e prior to answering the questionna­ire and their reported chocolate intake. But there wasn’t.

“It’s not possible to talk about causality, because that’s nearly impossible to prove with our design,” said Elias. “But we can talk about direction. Our study definitely indicates that the direction is not that cognitive ability affects chocolate consumptio­n, but that chocolate consumptio­n affects cognitive ability.” Why exactly eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function Crichton can’t say with absolute certainty. Nor can Elias, who says he expected to observe the opposite effect - that chocolate, given its sugar content, would be correlated with stunted rather than enhanced cognitive abilities. But they have a few ideas.

They know, for instance, that nutrients called cocoa flavanols, which are found naturally in cocoa, and thus chocolate, seem to have a positive effect on people’s brains. In 2014, one concluded that eating the nutrient can “reduce some measures of agerelated cognitive dysfunctio­n.” A 2011 study, meanwhile found that cocoa flavanols “positively influence psychologi­cal processes.” Chocolate, like both coffee and tea, also has methylxant­hines, plant-produced compounds that enhance various bodily functions. Among them: concentrat­ion levels. A number of studies have shown this, including one in 2004, and another in 2005. — WP-Bloomberg

Merrill Elias, psychologi­st

 ??  ?? Feeding infants small amounts of mashed-up peanuts early in life may help them avoid developing allergies, even if they stop eating peanuts for a year in early childhood. — Relaxnews photo
Feeding infants small amounts of mashed-up peanuts early in life may help them avoid developing allergies, even if they stop eating peanuts for a year in early childhood. — Relaxnews photo

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia