The Borneo Post

How much is an Afghan life worth? That depends

-

WASHINGTON: In March 2014, the US military paid an Afghan man just over US$ 1,000 to compensate for killing his civilian son in an operation near the border with Iran, according to US military records released to Reuters.

Six months later, another Afghan father was given US$10,000 by the US military after his child, also a civilian, was killed in an American-led military operation in the same province.

And 68-year- old Haji Allah Dad lost 20 relatives, including his brother and sister-in-law, in a US and Afghan special forces operation near the northern city of Kunduz last November.

Allah Dad said he received no money from the US military, though he did get compensati­on from the Afghan government.

Nearly 16 years since invading Afghanista­n, the United States has no standardis­ed process for making compensati­on payments to the families of thousands of Afghan civilians killed or injured in US-led military operations. It first started paying the families of Afghan victims as a way to counter Taliban militants who were doing the same.

America’s approach to compensati­on is arbitrary by design as it tries to negotiate Afghanista­n’s cultural and regional sensitivit­ies as a foreign military force. But civil activists say the system is unfair and confusing for often poor and uneducated Afghans.

A Pentagon spokesman said the military leaves the decision on how much to pay to commanders on the ground because they are best positioned to judge the incidents.

“Condolence payments in Afghanista­n are based on cultural norms of the local area, advice from Afghan partners, and the circumstan­ces of the event,” said spokesman Adam Stump.

“US commanders in theater are therefore empowered to make decisions regarding payments as they have the greatest understand­ing of these factors,” Stump said.

It is unclear how the US military puts these factors in monetary terms. Washington started making condolence payments in Afghanista­n in 2005 after realising that the Taliban was gaining influence and goodwill by giving civilians money after fatal US strikes, according to the Center for Civilians in Conflict, a US-based advocacy and research group.

The United States does not have to pay compensati­on to civilians killed in its military actions under internatio­nal and national law. However, it has made such payments going back to the Korean War in the 1950s. In some cases, it paid compensati­on to the relatives of civilians it killed in the Iraq conflict.

Critics warn the lack of standardis­ation in compensati­on payments means Afghan civilian victims are not treated equally as the conflict there grinds on.

The top US commander in Afghanista­n has said several thousand more troops would be needed to break a stalemate with the Taliban.

“It’s of great concern that we’re talking about stepping up the way that we carry operations without a standard operating procedure for making condolence payments,” said Marla Keenan, senior director of programs at the Center for Civilians in Conflict.

“A man in Kandahar may get US$ 4,000 for his damaged car while a woman in Gardez gets US$ 1,000 for her dead child. Civilians deserve better,” Keenan said.

According to US military documents obtained by Reuters under a Freedom of Informatio­n Act request, American forces have paid Afghan families about US$1.2 million for the deaths of at least 101 Afghans and injuries to 270 others from the end of 2013 to 2016.

Almost all of the victims were civilians. Five of the payments were to members of the Afghan government, the documents, which have previously not been published, show. The amount of payments, even in apparently similar cases, varies.

“This shows that each unit was setting its own policy and that there’s no standard operating procedure (or even financial guidance) across the military for how to make these payments and how much they should be,” said Keenan.

In Allah Dad’s case, the money came not from the United States but from the Afghan government. The attack that killed his relatives in Boz, near Kunduz, was the subject of a US military probe, which found in January that 33 civilians were killed and 27 wounded when US and Afghan special forces returned fire against Taliban fighters using civilian houses and called in US air support.

The United States did not make any condolence payments and left it to the Afghan government to decide what it wanted to do, Captain Bill Salvin, a spokesman for US forces in Afghanista­n, said. It is unclear why.

Mahmoud Danish, a spokesman for governor of Kunduz province, said the Afghan government paid 100,000 Afghanis ( US$ 1,500) for each death and 50,000 Afghanis ( US$ 750) for each of those wounded. Allah Dad said the United States should have also taken responsibi­lity for the civilian victims. — AFP

Condolence payments in Afghanista­n are based on cultural norms of the local area, advice from Afghan partners, and the circumstan­ces of the event. Adam Stump, Pentagon spokesman

 ??  ?? People and civil defence personnel remove rubble as they look for survivors at a damaged site after an air strike on rebel-held Idlib city, Syria. — Reuters photo
People and civil defence personnel remove rubble as they look for survivors at a damaged site after an air strike on rebel-held Idlib city, Syria. — Reuters photo

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia