The Borneo Post

‘Love, Cecil’ paints an admiring if shallow portrait of the artist Cecil Beaton

- By Michael O’Sullivan

WATCHING ‘ Love, Cecil’, an affectiona­te documentar­y portrait of the photograph­er, compulsive diarist and film and theatre designer Cecil Beaton, it’s impossible not to wonder what this visual obsessive and unabashed narcissist could have done with a smartphone. The English artist and dandy - who broke into photograph­y in the 1920s by documentin­g the theatrical antics of a group of bohemian London socialites known as the Bright Young Things - seems made for the age of the Instagram selfie.

Just as that observatio­n was occurring to me during Lisa Immordino Vreeland’s thorough and pleasurabl­e - if lightweigh­t - film, up pops Hamish Bowles to make the very same point. Bowles, the internatio­nal editorat-large for Vogue magazine, is one of several talking heads who weigh in on Beaton, a figure who looms large in the landscape of 20th- century style. ( Beaton won three Oscars: two for art design and costumes in 1964’s “My Fair Lady,” and one for costumes in 1958’s “Gigi.” He was also a regular photograph­er for Vogue and Vanity Fair, and many of his portraits of movie stars and celebritie­s - including the British royal family - are iconic.)

Vreeland’s film, for the most part, is structured around spoken passages from Beaton’s voluminous diaries, which are read, expressive­ly, by Rupert Everett. The actor ably channels the persona of the self- described “rabid aesthete.”

That, by the way, is an accurate job descriptio­n for a man whose career is hard to pigeonhole. Even Beaton’s World War II photograph­s have a certain romantic aesthetic to them, while just barely avoiding the glamorizat­ion of the battlefiel­d.

Beaton himself also appears throughout the film in archival interviews, offering his own interpreta­tion of a life guided by beauty above all. If that characteri­zation sounds superficia­l, well, it is. Of the great Katharine Hepburn, Beaton is heard assessing not her talent, but her physical appearance, comparing the actress, somewhat dismayingl­y, to “a dried-up boot.”

One wonders what Beaton would make of “Love, Cecil.” Vreeland’s film certainly attempts to touch on its subject’s inner life: the emotional impact of the suicide, in 1933, of Beaton’s younger brother Reggie, for instance, as well as his relationsh­ips with his three great loves - art collector Peter Watson, Olympic fencer Kin Hoitsma and actress Greta Garbo. At the same time, its emphasis, almost by necessity, is on the external. Of a 1971 TV documentar­y about him, Beaton complained in his diary that the film, while entertaini­ng, was “inconclusi­ve” and “superficia­l.”

You might say the same thing about “Love, Cecil.” — WPBloomber­g

* Two and one-half starts. Unrated. Contains nothing objectiona­ble. 98 minutes.

• Ratings Guide: Four stars masterpiec­e, three stars very good, two stars OK, one star poor, no stars waste of time.

 ??  ?? A young Cecil Beaton appears in a triple-self-portrait from the late 1910s. - Zeitgeist Films-Cecil Beaton Studio Archive at Sotheby’s
A young Cecil Beaton appears in a triple-self-portrait from the late 1910s. - Zeitgeist Films-Cecil Beaton Studio Archive at Sotheby’s

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia