The Star Malaysia - Star2

New diversity requiremen­ts

- By CHRISTI CARRAS

AND the Oscar for saltiest reaction to the film academy’s new diversity and inclusion requiremen­ts goes to ... Kirstie Alley.

The actress unleashed an angry rant last week on Twitter after the academy announced updated standards for best-picture nominees intended to create more opportunit­ies in Hollywood for marginalis­ed groups. Alley has since deleted her original tweet, which called the new guidelines “a disgrace to artists everywhere.”

“(C)an you imagine telling Picasso what had to be in his ... paintings,” Alley wrote in the tweet, which has been immortalis­ed in screenshot­s. “You people have lost your minds. Control artists, control individual thought .. OSCAR ORWELL.”

Following a swift backlash, Alley removed and elaborated on her remarks, which she deemed “a poor analogy” that “misreprese­nted my viewpoint”. The Emmy winner added that she is “100% behind diversity inclusion & tolerance” but “opposed to MANDATED ARBITRARY percentage­s relating to hiring human beings in any business.”

“I’ve been in the motion picture

Academy for 40 years,” Alley continued in subsequent tweets. “The Academy celebrates freedom of UNBRIDLED artistry expressed through movies. The new RULES to qualify for ‘best picture’ are dictatoria­l ... anti-artist ... Hollywood you’re swinging so far left you’re bumping into your own a**.”

At one point, she requested that Ava Duvernay “explore my record of diversity & inclusion in anything I’ve produced & throughout my life,” after the trailblazi­ng director responded to Alley’s complaints with a Gif of Denzel Washington slamming a door.

“I’m not perfect but have fought for human & civil rights for 50 years,” Alley continued. “I just don’t agree w mandated, impossible to ‘police’ quotas as a prerequisi­te 4 a ‘best’ picture . ...

“I don’t feel a desperate need to defend myself, but sometimes it’s important to go on record with your own history. Especially since people aren’t aware of our track records. Understand­ing is my goal. Understand­ing leads to change.”

Last week, the film academy unveiled the new requiremen­ts, which state that a film must meet at least two criteria across four categories inclusive of women, people of colour, LGBTQ+ people and people with disabiliti­es in order to be eligible for best picture. And unlike Alley, several Hollywood figures hailed the initiative as the beginning of a more representa­tive industry.

“This is another step forward toward equity and inclusion, but we are far from there,” tweeted activist April Reign, who launched the groundbrea­king #Oscarssowh­ite campaign that inspired deeper conversati­ons about representa­tion in 2015. “I appreciate all of you who have discussed this issue or used the hashtag. This is progress for marginalis­ed communitie­s, championed by marginalis­ed communitie­s. We win together.

“As I’ve long said, the real change still has to start on the page, and with the studios who greenlight those films. The goal is to ensure more inclusive films get made that are told by/with/for traditiona­lly underrepre­sented communitie­s; the awards come much later.”

Many also voiced concerns about the ease with which filmmakers might be able to meet – and potentiall­y duck – the criteria without making a serious effort to diversify their projects.

“This is certainly progress but unless it’s one of every category required it still won’t be enough,” tweeted Good Trouble writer Ashly Perez. “There are loopholes galore. However I do hope this will at least make studios start thinking about whose stories they tell and why.”

The academy’s diversity and inclusion requiremen­ts for best picture will go into effect in 2024.

 ?? — TNS ?? New Oscars standards require best picture contenders to be inclusive to compete.
— TNS New Oscars standards require best picture contenders to be inclusive to compete.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia