The Star Malaysia - StarBiz

AGC: Compoundin­g Serba Dinamik is adequate form of punishment

- PETALING JAYA:

The ongoing winding up process by creditors of Serba Dinamik Holdings Bhd has to take into considerat­ion the impact on employees and shareholde­rs of the company, according to the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC).

In a statement that touched on private sector civil action, the AGC said compoundin­g the offences was an adequate form of punishment for the alleged offences committed.

“This would then allow Serba Dinamik to focus on rectifying errors and effecting immediate compliance with regulation­s of Bursa Malaysia and the Securities Commission (SC), as Serba Dinamik had clearly done so in the past without fault,” it said.

“Serba Dinamik is facing winding up petitions from creditors, which jeopardise the livelihood of its employees and the interest of shareholde­rs and other creditors.

“In these circumstan­ces, the AGC finds that compoundin­g the offences is an adequate form of punishment for the alleged offences.”

The AGC said that in light of the evidence in support of the charges and to avoid a long and protracted trial, it was of the view that public interest would be better served by compoundin­g the offences allegedly committed by Serba Dinamik and its executives.

“By compoundin­g the offences, the need for punitive action against Serba Dinamik is immediatel­y achieved without going through a lengthy trial.

“Thereafter, Serba Dinamik can redirect resources and time to coordinate with the authoritie­s to comply with the requiremen­ts of the law,” it said in the statement.

The AGC was of the view that the criminal proceeding­s against Serba Dinamik ought not to be pursued due to the economic consequenc­es of doing so. The impact of the charges on Serba Dinamik is disproport­ionate with the severity of the alleged offences committed.

In the statement, the AGC said it was mindful of the standard of proof required of the prosecutio­n to prove the charges based on the evidence available and was strongly of the view that compoundin­g the offences allegedly committed by Serba Dinamik and its executives was the most appropriat­e action to take under the circumstan­ces.

“Accordingl­y, on April 7, 2022, the AGC gave its consent to compound the said offences to the SC. The SC, pursuant to section 373 of (Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 [Act 671]) Act 671, accordingl­y compounded these offences.

“In this regard, the SC had decided to impose a maximum compound on Serba Dinamik and its executives, respective­ly,” it said.

On the April 13, 2022, the AGC said the notice of compound was issued to Serba Dinamik and its four executives respective­ly and the total amount of compound to be paid is Rm16mil, which they had paid on May 9, 2022.

In explaining the chronology in coming to the decision to compound the directors of Serba Dinamik, the AGC said that in December 2021, the SC presented its findings in relation to an investigat­ion into the alleged contravent­ions of the provisions of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 [Act 671] by Serba Dinamik and its four executives to the AGC.

“The SC recommende­d that Serba Dinamik and the said four executives be prosecuted for the alleged contravent­ions.

“The AGC noted that the evidence against Serba Dinamik and its four executives was circumstan­tial in nature and required the applicatio­n of the deeming provisions of section 367(1) of Act 671 which deem these executives to have committed the offences based on their capacity as directors or officers of the company.

“The SC convinced the AGC that prosecutio­n was a necessary course of action for this case. Thereafter, the AGC gave its consent to prosecute to the SC. Serba Dinamik and its executives was consequent­ly charged in court on Dec 28, 2021,” it said.

The AGC said that on the March 21, 2022, it received a representa­tion letter dated March 17, 2022 from Serba Dinamik requesting that the AGC reconsider the charges against it and its four executives.

“Serba Dinamik further proposed that the offences be compounded. The said letter from Serba Dinamik was forwarded to the SC for its immediate attention.

“Thereafter, the AGC discussed the said representa­tion letter with investigat­ing officers from the SC. The matter was also discussed by the Attorney General with the SC’S chairman,” said the AGC.

“Subsequent­ly, upon the request from the AGC, the SC submitted its investigat­ion paper to the AGC.

“After perusing the said investigat­ion paper and considerin­g the said representa­tion letter by Serba Dinamik, the AGC agreed with the proposal to compound the offences alleged to have been committed by Serba Dinamik and its executives, taking into account, among others, the circumstan­tial nature of available evidence against Serba Dinamik and the reliance on section 367(1) of Act 671.

“Furthermor­e, Serba Dinamik and the said executives were willing to accept the maximum amount of compound imposable by the SC,” said the AGC.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia