The Star Malaysia

Towards just policing

The last five decades have shown overwhelmi­ng concern for order and stability at the expense of basic civil and political rights.

-

AN Internatio­nal Conference on Principled Policing was held last week to examine a whole range of issues relating to the role of the police in a rule of law society.

Speaker after speaker acknowledg­ed that the police force is an indispensa­ble, key agency in our criminal justice system.

The men and women in blue help to prevent crime, maintain law and order, conduct investigat­ion of crimes, ensure production before the courts of those on trial and oversee post-sentence surveillan­ce over criminals.

In this age of cross-border crimes, terrorist attacks and the nefarious trade in drugs, arms and human beings, the challenges of policing are indeed immense.

The overworked and underpaid members of the police force undoubtedl­y put their life and limb on the line so that the rest of us can go about the pursuits of life in peace and harmony.

The police force is, or can become, an important pillar of the rule of law because control of crime and preservati­on of public order are important aspects of human rights protection.

Police powers are necessary to preserve the social fabric of society and to create an environmen­t in which people can live without fear.

Having said that it must also be observed that the police force is subject to much social censure for the manner it performs its profession­al roles.

The gist of the problem is that there is an eternal clash between order and liberty.

The power of the police to maintain public order clashes with the citizens’ legitimate demand for human rights. A “one or the other” or an “all or nothing” approach is unwise. A balance between the might of the state and the rights of the citizens is needed.

The approach of the Federal Constituti­on and other laws like the Criminal Procedure Code, the Police Act and the Evidence Act is to provide for such a balance.

Article 5(1) of the Federal Constituti­on guarantees that no one shall be deprived of life or personal liberty save in accordance with the law. No person should be made to suffer in body or goods except for a distinct breach of law establishe­d in the ordinary legal manner before the ordinary courts.

Article 5(2) grants the remedy of habeas corpus if the detention is contrary to the law.

Article 5(3) imposes a duty on arresting authoritie­s to inform the arrestee of the grounds of arrest and to allow him to consult and be defended by a lawyer.

Article 5(4) requires that, subject to some exceptions, every arrestee must be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours.

Article 10 of the Constituti­on relating to the fundamenta­l right to speech, assembly and associatio­n, is meant to provide enough democratic space so that freedom may ring and liberty may soar.

At the same time the authoritie­s are permitted to impose restrictio­ns on specified, permissibl­e grounds in order to prevent disorder.

Parliament is not supreme and the courts have the power of judicial review of legislativ­e and executive acts if they infringe on the mandates of the Constituti­on.

In addition, there is a Human Rights Commission to blow the whistle on violations of basic liberties.

Regrettabl­y, however, the last five decades have shown overwhelmi­ng concern for order and stability at the expense of basic civil and political rights. Many powers of the police and many extra-legal police practices pose grave threats to a regime of rule of law.

Many laws institutio­nalise departures from human rights ideals. For example, the ISA and a number of other preventive detention laws permit detention without a conviction in a court of law.

Junior police personnel sometimes make insensitiv­e and racist remarks. The problem is compounded by an ethnically imbalanced police force. Citizens seeking to make police reports are given the runaround. There is absence of an independen­t Police Complaints Board.

There are no remedies available if a citizen’s report to the police or other law enforcemen­t agencies is not investigat­ed and acted upon.

Unlike in the United Kingdom, there is no record here of the judicial order of mandamus to command the police to enforce the law when there is a prima facie case of violation. There are allegation­s of selective prosecutio­n and political interferen­ce in police work.

It is alleged that police arrest first, investigat­e afterwards. Security laws are often used to rope in ordinary criminals.

Allegation­s have been made of too many shootouts with criminal suspects resulting in extra-judicial deaths. Prison deaths are not unknown.

There are no time limits to remand terms and no right to an expeditiou­s trial. Lawyers are often not allowed to see their clients. Arrestees who succeed in obtaining habeas corpus are often rearrested immediatel­y.

Violence against and torture of remand prisoners to force them to make confession­s is not unknown. Rules on interrogat­ion are often violated.

Illegally obtained evidence can be admitted provided it is not obtained oppressive­ly. Admissibil­ity and legality are not one and the same thing.

In the human rights era in which we are living and with the increasing levels of legal literacy, it is imperative that humanright­s awareness should become an important component of police training.

Human rights abuses in any land deserve wordwide condemnati­on because “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”.

Police personnel must also be aware that there are now internatio­nal remedies available to victims of human rights.

However, one must note that there are some positive signs on the policing front. Some outdated laws have been repealed. Others are being reviewed.

Internatio­nal human rights law is influencin­g our policing system. Educationa­l levels and profession­alism in the police are rising. The Human Rights Commission, against all odds, is continuing to speak up for human rights.

Much has been accomplish­ed. However, what is most imperative is that besides legal changes, new human rights attitudes need to be instilled. > Shad Saleem Faruqi is Emeritus Professor of Law at UITM and Visiting Professor at USM

 ?? SHAD SALEEM FARUQI shadsaleem@yahoo.co.uk ??
SHAD SALEEM FARUQI shadsaleem@yahoo.co.uk

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia