Water solution in the pipeline e
Win-win formula being thrashed out for all parties concerned
Wehave to professionally make another offer. Hopefully this time both federal and state governments arrive at some consensus.
- Suhaimi Kamaralzaman
A“COMPLICATED mess” has been used to describe the state of affairs involving Selangor’s water problems.
How that was going to be sorted out was anyone’s guess but the mood has turned for the better in recent times.
Optimism is there that a resolution will be reached by the end of the year and industry observers point to the federal government’s increasingly hands-on approach as indicated by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s letter in June to the Selangor government to sort out this matter as the key catalyst to an eventual resolution.
Kumpulan Darul Ehsan Bhd (KDEB) president Suhaimi Kamaralzaman sounds upbeat on the prospects of an eventual resolution to this matter despite a potential new offer being maintained at the same price of RM9.65bil as had been the case in February.
“We are hopeful that a resolution would be forthcoming so that we can step in and make the offer. When I say this it does not mean that it would be any different from the fourth (previous) offer but the fourth offer had a certain timeframe and many of the concessionaires replied at the last day and it is presumed lapsed now,” Suhaimi tells StarBizWeek.
“To revive this, we have to professionally make another offer. Hopefully this time both federal and state governments arrive at some general consensus on how the restructuring is going to proceed. If you recall, the fourth offer (in February) was made without any framework by the federal government,” he adds.
As the hour-long interview at KDEB’s headquarters in Shah Alam progressed, the finalisation of this figure was more flexible than before as Pengurusan Aset Air Bhd (PAAB) will acquire the state’s water assets.
PAAB is expected to pay RM7.7bil, which is equivalent to the total liabilities to be assumed from the water companies but the actual figure would be finalised after a proper due diligence process.
Thereafter, it is planned that the operations of these assets would be handled by the state’s special purpose vehicle (SPV) through a lease from PAAB.
“We would run the operations through the SPV, which would be wholly owned by the state,” Suhaimi says.
When asked if there were any variables to the calculation of the 12% return on equity figure of almost RM2bil, Suhaimi maintained it was fixed at KDEB’s end and at the same time was more open to different interpretations anchored on “reasonableness”.
“This time around, the mandate which the state has given to KDEB is to go as far as to say that we are willing to sign on the conditional agreement that they (the companies) accept our 12% first. We will pay you the 12% and then you will bring what you think is fair to the international arbitration process,” he says.
In case of a dispute, the parties will seek a resolution from a neutral arbitrator so that parties without vested interests would be able to decide on this matter, he adds.
International arbitrators
“If the international arbitrators think it is say 15% for argument’s sake, then we would pay the 3% (remainder) upon completion of the arbitration process. The good thing about this is that we believe our offer is transparent as everyone will know how this 12% is calculated,” he says.
The complicated and fragmented nature of the water industry in Selangor is the main reason why this matter needs to be resolved as soon as possible.
It is this fragmented nature that led to the eventual water stalemate and it indirectly is also reflected on the quality of water the people of Selangor have been receiving and consuming all this while due to the entire cumbersome management structure of the Selangor water supply chain.
The Selangor water industry is presently being handled by four different operators namely Syabas, Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd, Syarikat Pengeluar Air Selangor Sdn Bhd and Konsortium Abass Sdn Bhd.
“This stalemate has been prevalent for sometime. Having multiple operators perpetuates inefficiency as each one would have its own staff, and there would be transfer pricing from one company to another. Companies also have totally different shareholders,” Suhaimi says.
“Once we remove these inefficiencies, we would know the true cost of providing water services to the consumer. Thereafter we can set tariffs in a fair manner. Should they need to be adjusted upwards or downwards, then we can also justify it to the consumer,” he adds.
The absence of an efficient structure would hinder simple matters such as determining a fair tariff pricing.
“It would not be one company selling water to another company with profits at many levels of the supply chain. A restructuring under the SPV would remove the multiple margins, then we can move forward,” he says.
“As a new company under the new water regime with the Water Services Industry Act, we have to be licensed under Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Air Negara (Span). We need to submit a business plan and the regulator would study it and challenge our numbers (for tariffs) for justification. Then only the begA the min bec ting cos
“tha mo loo mit how the
“yea pla imp any be r ere pla
W stru reso not and sup
La
T pla to b puz agr
W the the ide as i era
“bod don and wit as t the peo day PAA
“per vin bes req from
T rest ally wo the
“on you leas figu imp me (co fea
T pra oug pro ass wo wo and
e process of setting the tariffs can gin,” he adds. At the end of the day, returns to e operators through a fair deternation of tariffs must be worked cause it would go towards offsetg operational and investment sts. “The second benefit is... projects at have been held back can now ove. The government is now oking at ad-hoc measures such as tigation projects – which is not w we plan the water supply for e state,” Suhaimi says. “We should look at a 20- or 30ar plan based on a solid business an and on efficient costs for the provement of water supply and y ad-hoc agreement would not removed but rather be consided as part of this bigger picture an,” he adds. With a clearer and more efficient ucture, the eventual benefits of a solution to the stalemate would t only be felt by the operators d consumers but along the entire pply chain as well.
angat 2
The Langat 2 water treatment ant would seem on the surface be the final piece of the jigsaw zzle as the prelude to the total reement to this takeover deal. While it seems to be that way on e surface, it is understood that ere needs to be a buy-in to this ea from the Selangor government it had been proposed by the fedal government in the first place. “My personal view is that somedy should explain and say it is ne on a transparent tender basis d design is the most cost efficient th no unnecessary things inside the cost would not be borne by e federal government but by the ople of Selangor at the end of the y,” Suhaimi, who was a former AB CEO, says. “I believe that from the state’s rspective, they need to be connced that they are getting the st value for their money. If it is quired then the state can tackle it m there,” he adds. The bigger aim for a water structuring is that PAAB eventuy owns any water assets while it ould be leased and operated by e SPV. “This lease price would be based market prices. If for instance u build the asset for RM2bil, the ase price would be based on this ure. And that is why it is very portant for the federal governent to share with the state these osting) numbers to allay these ars,” he says. Thus, it is not only logical but actical for both parties to be thorghly involved in the construction ocess of any additional water sets as ultimately the ones who ould pay to use these these assets ould be the state and its residents d businesses.