CAMERON HAD STAKE IN OFFSHORE FUND

British PM had £30,000 share in offshore fund set up by father

LONDON: British Prime Minister David Cameron has admitted that

£ he had held a 30,000 (RM165,430) stake in an offshore fund set up by his father, after days of pressure following the publication of the so-called Panama Papers.

Cameron sold the stake in the Bahamas-based trust in 2010, four months before he became prime minister, he said in an interview with TV channel ITV on Thursday.

Downing Street has issued four statements on the affair following Sunday’s publication of the leaked Panama Papers, which showed how law firm Mossack Fonseca helped firms and wealthy individuals set up offshore companies.

“We owned 5,000 units in Blairmore Investment Trust, which we sold in January 2010. That was worth

£ something like 30,000.

“I sold them all in 2010 because if I was going to become prime minister I didn’t want anyone to say you have other agendas, vested interests,” Cameron said.

He said he had paid income tax on the dividends from the sale of the units, which he bought in 1997.

Downing Street first dismissed the story as a private matter on Monday before saying Cameron had no offshore funds, then saying he and his wife and children did not benefit from any offshore funds.

It later said Cameron would not benefit from such funds in the future.

The row is the latest headache for Cameron, who faces a tight race to ensure Britain stays in the European Union in a referendum due to be held on June 23.

The prime minister has been under intense pressure from the main opposition Labour party and media to come clean over his financial arrangements past and present.

Labour’s deputy leader Tom Watson told Sky News that, while it was too early to say whether Cameron should quit, “he may have to resign over this but we need to know a lot more about what his financial arrangements have been”. Cameron indicated in the ITV interview that he would be prepared to publish his tax returns, although a previous offer to do so in 2012 did not materialise.

The story could be damaging partly since it taps into a perception of the Conservatives as the party of the rich, and its leadership as products of affluent backgrounds educated at some of Britain’s most costly schools.

“The prime minister has always been aware that if voters knew the scale of his wealth, they would consider him incapable of relating to their daily struggles,” wrote Isabel Oakeshott, author of a biography of Cameron, in the Daily Mail this week.