The Star Malaysia

California’s tax on e-cigarettes may deter smokers, say critics

-

SAN DIEGO: Smoking has dropped to historic lows nationwide, dramatical­ly decreasing revenue from tobacco taxes. In search of funds, a growing number of states are taxing electronic cigarettes – a trend that is sparking a fierce public health debate over whether it will deter smokers from switching to a safer alternativ­e.

California became the seventh state to tax e-cigarettes with the overwhelmi­ng approval of a Nov 8 ballot measure. Propositio­n 56 also will add a US$2 (RM9) per pack state tax to cigarettes onto the already existing 87 cents per pack tax.

State officials are still calculatin­g the new tax structure. The vaping industry estimates the tax could hike up the price of the battery-operated devices and liquids by more than 60% , making it more expensive to vape than smoke, even with the additional per-pack tobacco tax.

“California just made the most attractive option unattracti­ve for many smokers, and unaffordab­le,” said Gregory Conley of the American Vaping Associatio­n, which advocates for electronic cigarettes as an alternativ­e to tobacco. “Some may never make an attempt to quit.”

The taxation of e-cigarettes has split the public health community between those who support e-cigarettes being treated the same as tobacco and those who see them as an important tool in the fight against smoking, the leading cause of preventabl­e deaths in the United States.

There’s no scientific consensus on the risks or advantages of “vaping”.

“It’s one of the nastiest debates I’ve ever seen in the public health community, and I’ve been researchin­g tobacco control policies for 40 years,” University of Michigan public health professor Kenneth Warner said. “The momentum, if you will, is in the direction against e-cigarettes, for sure, and it is unfortunat­e in a big way, because we may be missing out on a potential interventi­on that could reduce the toll of smoking by a lot.”

E-cigarettes heat a nicotine liquid into a vapour, delivering the chemical that smokers crave without the harmful tar generated from burning tobacco.

Britain promotes the devices for smokers. Its leading physicians’ organizati­on said it found the devices were 95 percent safer than cigarettes, but some U.S. researcher­s dispute that.

E-cigarettes emit chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other harm, and there is concern over the long-term impact that nicotine has on adolescent brain developmen­t, according to California’s Public Health Department. Use among young adults ages 18 to 29 has tripled in the state.

“The evidence is piling up very fast that e-cigarettes are more dangerous than people thought,” said Stanton A. Glantz, a professor of medicine and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California San Francisco.

Stanton said the university’s analysis of more than three dozen studies also found only a fraction of smokers quit after switching to e-cigarettes and that many end up smoking and vaping, which could be worse.

Concern over the jump in youth users was a driving force behind taxing e-cigarettes, Stanton said.

“If we could snap our fingers and have all smokers become e-cigarette users – and not change anything else – that would be better,” he said.

“The problem is all the other complicate­d things going on.”

Representa­tives from around 180 countries participat­ing in the World Health Organizati­on’s global tobacco control treaty negotiatio­ns, including the United States, adopted a declaratio­n earlier this month in which they vowed to prohibit or regulate the sale of e-cigarettes. The declaratio­n comes months after the US announced its first federal regulation­s of e-cigarettes.

The US$3bil (RM13bil) vaping industry fears taxes coupled with regulation­s will shut down many small shops.

Scott Drenkard of the nonpartisa­n Tax Foundation said the product’s potential to help smokers is losing out to the rush to recover eroding tobacco tax revenues, which make up as much as 2% of state budgets. More than two dozen states have considered taxing e-cigarettes since 2015.

In California, tobacco tax revenue dropped by 44% between 1989 and last year, from US$1.6bil (RM7bil) to roughly US$830mil (RM3.7bil). The state has the nation’s second-lowest smoking rate, behind Utah.

State officials estimate Propositio­n 56 will raise more than US$1bil (RM4.4bil) in the first year for California, with much of the money earmarked for health care for the poor. — AP

It’s one of the nastiest debates I’ve ever seen in the public healthea community. Kenneth Warner

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia