The Star Malaysia

Trump paints a dark picture in defence of ban

While Obama insisted the Islamic State did not pose an existentia­l threat to the US, Trump says the group is ‘determined to strike our homeland’.

- By JULIE PACE

THE more Donald Trump tries to build support for his refugee and immigratio­n ban, the darker the world seems to get.

In defending his policies barring refugees and curbing immigratio­n, the president is painting an increasing­ly ominous picture of the danger posed by Islamic extremists. In his speeches, tweets and an imposing new tally of what Trump calls an unreported “genocide” by the Islamic State group, he has raised the prospect of imminent attacks on the United States and cast the debate over safety as a clash between radical Islam and the West.

Early Wednesday, Trump took to Twitter to say that if the US doesn’t win the court case over his travel ban, the country “can never have the security and safety to which we are entitled”.

To Trump’s supporters, the president’s dark warnings show that he has a clear-eyed view of the terror threat facing the US – a threat they believe Barack Obama downplayed. Trump’s critics fear he is hyping one threat at the expense of others.

Islamic extremism is “an enemy that celebrates death and totally worships destructio­n”, Trump said while visiting the headquarte­rs of the military’s Central Command.

The list his administra­tion is circulatin­g highlights the debate. The White House points to the 78 incidents as evidence that the news media are intentiona­lly downplayin­g the dangers of the Islamic State group. “Most” incidents on the list haven’t received sufficient attention, the White House says.

Trump’s terror list, however, focuses only on attacks the White House says were “executed or inspired by” the Islamic State. Terrorism carried out in the name of other causes didn’t make the list. For example, Trump’s list does not include violence by Boko Haram, an Islamist insurgent group operating in West Africa that pledged allegiance to the Islamic State in 2015. It is responsibl­e for far more deaths than IS, including suicide bombings, mass shootings and massacres of civilians in Nigeria and neighbouri­ng countries.

The White House list also leaves off last month’s attack on a mosque in Quebec, where six Muslim men were shot and killed. A French Canadian man known for far-right, nationalis­t views has been charged and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has called it an act of terrorism against Muslims.

The White House says Trump did call Trudeau to express condolence­s. But his failing to mention it now appears to reflect his narrow focus on the Islamic State.

Although he has been vague about his plans for countering the Islamic State in its stronghold­s in Iraq and Syria, he has moved swiftly to try to keep the group’s followers out of the United States, signing an executive order in his first week in office that banned all entries from seven Muslim-majority countries with terror ties. Trump’s directive also halted the entire US refugee programme for four months and banned Syrians from the US indefinite­ly.

The ban is now held up in the courts, prompting a fierce response from the president.

In a strikingly personal attack on the judiciary, Trump said the judge should bear the blame if an attack occurs while his ban is paused. He’s warned that the court order has allowed people to start “pouring in” to the United States, despite the fact that those who do not currently hold legal visas must go through lengthy vetting procedures before entering the country.

“IS said we are going to infiltrate the United States and other countries through the migration,” Trump said during a White House meeting with sheriffs earlier in the week. “And then we’re not allowed to be tough on the people coming in? Explain that one.”

Evelyn Farkas, who was deputy assistant defence secretary during the Obama adminis- tration, argues that the president’s warnings are creating “a level of concern that probably isn’t warranted by the threats assessment”.

In recent years, federal law enforcemen­t agencies have focused more on the threat posed by homegrown extremists – people, usually men, who are already in the US and who find themselves attracted to Islamic State propaganda of violence and mayhem. Still, officials concede that it’s impossible to guarantee a mistake-free screening process for people seeking to come to the US, particular­ly given the paucity of informatio­n sometimes available on people entering from Syria.

White House spokesman Sean Spicer says the president isn’t trying to scare Americans. Still, he said foreboding­ly on Tuesday, “The Earth is a very dangerous place.”

The president’s intense focus on Islamic terrorism is shared by some of his top aides, including National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and chief strategist Steve Bannon, who was one of the architects of the refugee ban. Flynn has called Islam a “political ideology” and said it “hides behind being a religion”.

Trump’s rhetoric marks a sharp shift from his most recent predecesso­rs. In the aftermath of the Sept 11, 2001, attacks, President George W. Bush emphasised that the US was not at war with Muslims. Obama refused to use the term “radical Islamic extremism”, arguing that it validated terrorists who claimed they were acting on behalf of their faith.

The contrast between Trump and Obama is particular­ly striking.

While Obama insisted the Islamic State did not pose an existentia­l threat to the US, Trump says the group is “on a campaign of genocide” and is “determined to strike our homeland”. Obama warned about overstatin­g the Islamic State’s capabiliti­es, while Trump says the group’s scope has not been reported widely enough.

Beyond the refugee ban, Trump officials are looking at whether to revamp a US programme aimed at countering violent extremism to target only Islamic-inspired terrorists, not white supremacis­ts or other groups. They’ve also discussed an executive order that would label the Muslim Brotherhoo­d, an Egyptian-based group, a terrorist organisati­on.

The White House has also discussed dropping sanctions on Russia that were levied in retaliatio­n for provocatio­ns in Ukraine if Moscow would work alongside the US in fighting the Islamic State. Vice-President Mike Pence appeared to raise that prospect over the weekend, saying the continuati­on of the sanctions depends on “the opportunit­y perhaps to work on common interests”.

“The president’s made it clear the top priority of this administra­tion is to hunt down and destroy IS at its source,” Pence said on ABC’s This Week.

 ?? — Reuters ?? Unfair decision: A protester holding a placard against Trump’s executive order outside the ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
— Reuters Unfair decision: A protester holding a placard against Trump’s executive order outside the ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia