The Star Malaysia

Opening up a can of worms:

From undersea tunnel project to Ayer Hitam – questions and doubts emerge.

- TAY TIAN YAN The writer is Sin Chew Daily deputy editor-in- chief.

THE trend for P148 looks promising and it will definitely be very hot.

No, I am not giving you any lucky numbers. P148 refers to Ayer Hitam parliament­ary constituen­cy in central Johor.

Ayer Hitam did not draw much attention before this. It is seen as a “safe seat” for Barisan Nasional, and has been held by MCA’s Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong for several terms.

Pakatan Harapan has allocated P148 to DAP. DAP, which was at first reluctant to contest there, told Amanah: “You can contest here under the DAP logo.”

It goes to show that DAP initially did not want to commit to a war it has no full confidence of winning.

But things have changed. Recently, DAP’s top leaders have upgraded the status of P148. Its adviser Lim Kit Siang said if (Pakatan) wants to take over Putrajaya, it has to wrestle Ayer Hitam.

People cannot really comprehend what the direct link is between Ayer Hitam and taking control of Putrajaya.

It would be easier to understand that the Opposition coalition is one step closer to Putrajaya if former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad wins Pulau Langkawi or Kubang Pasu.

But P148 Ayer Hitam? It is not the seat of (Prime Minister) Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, (Deputy Prime Minister) Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi or (Defence Minister ) Datuk Se r i Hishammudd­in Hussein. It is not special at all.

As for Dr Wee, it is still fresh on people’s minds that he has been aggressive in questionin­g the Penang undersea tunnel project.

Is DAP listing Ayer Hitam as their primary battlegrou­nd because they want to topple Dr Wee? Does it want to take the MCA deputy president down because he has been critical of the project?

Is this a strategy to attack Dr Wee in order to save Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and force Dr Wee to stop harping on the tunnel project?

Or perhaps, it is an “act of revenge” to show Dr Wee some colours?

Frankly speaking, I don’t think Dr Wee will back off as he is known for his tough personalit­y.

Quite the contrary, this will further boost his fighting will, prompting him to investigat­e the undersea tunnel issue further by diving 3km into the deep blue sea to seek answers.

From the people’s point of view, I think the focus should not be on the two personalit­ies.

This does not have to be a battle between Guan Eng and Dr Wee. This should go beyond a spat between them.

It should be an issue of public interest. The public can analyse the case and be the judge.

DAP’s intention to conquer Ayer Hitam will bring the tunnel project issue to a bigger platform for it to be scrutinise­d and debated. This will be a positive developmen­t.

People are interested to know why the feasibilit­y study and detailed designs for the undersea tunnel and three main roads would cost RM305mil.

A point to note is the feasibilit­y study and detailed designs for the three main roads cost more than RM200mil.

A back-of-the-envelope calculatio­n showed that the cost for every kilometre is about RM10mil, based on the total length of 20.3km.

The engineerin­g industry said the cost was “extraordin­arily high”. Is the feasibilit­y study so detailed that it will find out how many worms there are in every inch of the land?

The constructi­on cost of the undersea tunnel is RM3.6bil, with the feasibilit­y study and detailed design priced at RM96mil.

Why is the feasibilit­y study for the three roads higher than that of the tunnel when the roads are supposedly easier and cheaper to build?

Guan Eng insisted that not a single sen has been paid. But then, why has the state government transferre­d parcels of land to the investors involved?

With the exit of the builder from China and the entrance of a local fashion company (in the project’s special purpose vehicle), there is a change in the paid-up capital. This does not match the requiremen­t set earlier. How will the state government handle this?

The reports have yet to be completed and the project has not yet started. Will the tunnel still be built? Penang state executive councillor Chow Kon Yeow said the three main roads would be built first but will this go against the overall concept of the project?

In the very first place, does Penang really need an undersea tunnel and three main highways? Are the new infrastruc­tures going to solve the congestion in Penang or bring in more vehicles? Why doesn’t the state government build a metro rail? Wouldn’t it better suit the needs of Penangites?

From undersea tunnel to Ayer Hitam, a series of questions and doubts has emerged.

This should not be a dispute between Guan Eng and Dr Wee but an issue of public interest that ought to be explained and clarified.

In the very first place, does Penang really need an undersea tunnel and three main highways?

Are the new infrastruc­tures going to solve the congestion in Penang or bring in more vehicles?

 ?? newsdesk@thestar.com.my ??
newsdesk@thestar.com.my

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia