The Star Malaysia

Nothing but disaster

Letting the taliban take over afghanista­n isn’t exactly a ‘win’ for the united States.

- By HAL BRANDS

WHAT difference could a few thousand US troops possibly make to the outcome of a decades-long war in a broken country? That question constitute­d President Joe Biden’s central argument for withdrawin­g from the conflict in Afghanista­n.

Now, unfortunat­ely, we have our answer. Those troops were the crucial difference between an ugly but acceptable stalemate and a stunning collapse of the Afghan government, with all the humanitari­an and strategic traumas that will follow.

When Biden made his withdrawal decision in April, the administra­tion believed a Us-bankrolled government and military might survive for years. Even as the Taliban exploited the announceme­nt and launched major offensives, US officials argued that the Afghan army had the ability to hold critical terrain.

Now, city after city has been rolled up by the Taliban, as many – not all – of the Afghan forces defending them are melting away. US intelligen­ce analysts reportedly believe the country could fall within months if not weeks.

That forecast hasn’t led Biden to reverse his decision to withdraw. But it has led to a modest number of airstrikes against Taliban forces, along with an emergency deployment of thousands more troops meant to ensure that US personnel make it to the exits before Kabul, the capital, falls.

As the 20th anniversar­y of the 9/11 terror attacks in the United States nears, the Taliban are on their way to accomplish­ing the strategic defeat of a superpower. Afghans and the rest of the world will be bracing for aftereffec­ts: another politicall­y destabilis­ing wave of refugees headed for Europe; revenge killings, sexual enslavemen­t and human rights violations on a vast scale; slaughter of Afghans who worked with the United States and are now trapped in areas that have been overrun; empowermen­t of terrorist groups that are still allied with the Taliban; a strengthen­ed hand for China in Central Asia; and others.

Predictabl­y, events in Afghanista­n have set off recriminat­ions in Washington. Advocates of withdrawal are claiming vindicatio­n: If a government and military that the United States had invested in for 20 years fell apart this quickly, then surely the long US mission in Afghanista­n was a failure.

They have half a point. If the goal of US policy was to build an Afghan state that could stand on its own after an eventual US departure, then the rapidity of the collapse shows how far Washington was from achieving that objective.

But this argument is also disingenuo­us. A poorly planned, deadline-driven withdrawal – which was rapidly leaving Afghan forces without the close air support that could rescue them in extremis, the contractor­s that kept their air force flying, the logistical support that kept their units supplied, and the psychologi­cal backstop of having America behind them – denied the government a reasonable chance to adjust.

There’s also a larger point that advocates of withdrawal are missing: What has happened in the last few weeks shows just how valuable the US deployment in Afghan-istan was. At a regrettabl­e but, from a strategic perspectiv­e, manageable cost in money and US lives – fewer than 25 deaths per year since 2015, and steadily declining over time – that deployment was the critical factor preventing a long, grinding conflict from turning into the nightmare that is unfolding today. Given the price of removing US troops from Afghan-istan, perhaps keeping them there would have been a relative bargain.

The irony of the withdrawal is that Afghanista­n’s impact on American foreign policy is about to get bigger, not smaller. Biden’s hope was that leaving Afghanista­n would allow the United States to focus on more pressing matters, at home and abroad. The United States would reap a strategic dividend, the thinking went, in the form of money, military power and attention freed up by retrenchme­nt.

If events continue on their current trajectory, that dividend will not materialis­e. If the Taliban seize power or consolidat­e control over most of the country, there will be geopolitic­al aftershock­s from Europe to South Asia and beyond. The difficulty of preventing a resurgent terrorist threat will increase as America’s access to Afghan bases and territory decreases.

There will be psychologi­cal ramificati­ons, too: Even allies who understood why the United States was leaving Afghanista­n are likely to be affected by the haste, irresponsi­bility and callousnes­s with which Washington has made its departure.

Biden’s goal in withdrawin­g from Afghanista­n was to help Americans put an inconclusi­ve “forever war” behind them. But the collapse of that country, if it comes, will not only be a tragedy for many Afghans consigned to Taliban rule. It will also leave a dark legacy, moral and strategic, that the United States will not soon escape. – Bloomberg

 ?? — AP ?? Inching closer: taliban fighters stand guard inside the city of ghazni, south-west of Kabul on Friday, just weeks before the united States is set to officially end its two-decade war.
— AP Inching closer: taliban fighters stand guard inside the city of ghazni, south-west of Kabul on Friday, just weeks before the united States is set to officially end its two-decade war.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia