Worth the risk?
Ferguson’s final Premier League title, the prospect of the Scot being replaced by Mourinho was put to Sir Bobby Charlton, in his capacity as club director, but also as the man who embodies Old Trafford’s proud traditions.
Charlton, having been reminded of Mourinho poking the Barcelona assistant coach Tito Vilanova in the eye during a heated touchline exchange while he was Real Madrid manager, did not hide his disdain for the self-styled Special One.
“A United manager wouldn’t do that,” Charlton said.
“Mourinho is a really good coach, but that’s as far as I would go really. He pontificates too much for my liking.”
When Ferguson retired the following spring, United chose David Moyes, rather than Mourinho, to take over. Time has
altered the narrative, but back then, the message from Old Trafford was that Moyes not only possessed the credentials, but also the character, to do the job and that Mourinho was never the right fit.
If that was truly the case, Mourinho’s last two and a half seasons at Chelsea have done little to disprove Charlton’s viewpoint, although they have at least bagged a couple of trophies for the Stamford Bridge cabinet as compensation for all of the off-field issues that have accompanied Mourinho and his particular brand of management.
At times, the slightly built, stylish son of Setubal has resembled Gyp Rosetti, one of the more villainous characters of Boardwalk Empire, returning to Chelsea with his loyal henchmen – coaches Rui Faria and Silvino Louro – and raising Hell before being driven out of town and coming to a grisly end at the hands of those who had grown tired of his appetite for confrontation.
Faria and Louro both had their brushes with the authorities during Mourinho’s second spell as Chelsea manager, with Faria receiving a four-game stadium ban – reduced from six on appeal – and £30,000 fine for using abusive and/or insulting words towards fourth official Phil Dowd and refusing to leave the technical area during a game against Sunderland in April 2014.
Louro was charged with improper conduct, but escaped punishment, following an incident in the defeat at West Ham in October.
That game infamously resulted in Mourinho receiving a one-game stadium ban and £40,000 (RM256,000) fine for verbally abusing referee Jon Moss in the officials’ dressing room at half-time. But that incident was only the tip of the iceberg for Mourinho and the FA, with his charge sheet over the past two years as follows:
In March 2014, he was fined £8,000 (RM51,000) and warned as to his future conduct for entering the field of play and approaching the referee in a game against Aston Villa. A month later, Mourinho was fined £10,000 (RM64,000) for post-match media comments about the match officials.
In December 2014, there was a £25,000 (RM160,000) fine for more post-match comments, this time his suggestion of a “conspiracy” after a
game
at Southampton.
Fast forward to October this year and Mourinho was fined £50,000 (RM320,000) and given a suspended one-match stadium ban for post-match comments after the home defeat against Southampton.
Mourinho escaped sanction following his clash with Chelsea doctor Eva Carneiro in August, with the FA finding he had no case to answer, but that issue could yet be subject to legal proceedings.
During 2015, Chelsea as a club have been fined on three occasions – £30,000, £40,000 and then £50,000 – for failing to control their players against Everton, Arsenal and West Ham respectively, while Diego Costa (twice) and Ramires have served suspensions as a result of retrospective action for incidents unseen by the match officials.
For a club determined to project the image of the well-run, progressive outfit that it is, Mourinho’s Wild West style of management has been good for Chelsea only in a silverware sense, but without the success, the snarling and petulance is less easy to stomach.
It is not a new phenomenon, though. The dark arts have never been far from the surface when Mourinho has enjoyed success, with Martin O’Neill insisting only last week that he has still not forgiven the then-Porto manager for the gamesmanship and timewasting employed by the Portuguese club during their UEFA Cup final triumph against Celtic in 2003.
If they sack Van Gaal, United may be forced to confront the Mourinho question and ask whether he really is worth it.
But when Ferguson left, United were champions and they could afford to be choosy.
Two-and-a-half years on, the landscape is different and desperation is creeping in at Old Trafford, so Sir Bobby may have to accept the unacceptable and hope that Mourinho’s troublesome days are behind him. It will be a forlorn hope. – The Independent