The Sun (Malaysia)

BRICS set to grow more clout

- H T E C K G REUTERSPIC Lim Teck Ghee’s Another Take is aimed at demystifyi­ng social orthodoxy. Comments: letters@thesundail­y.com

THE five-nation BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) met in South Africa on Aug 23 amid Western media disparagem­ent of the grouping and aspersions cast on whether the “hodgepodge” of nations it represents would amount to any kind of force in internatio­nal economy and politics.

The fact that its two prominent members, India and China, have been in a protracted frontier dispute has long provided grist for Western media to play up the scenario that the two nations would never be able to work together and to argue as to why BRICS would fail.

E

Doubts still exist

However, BRICS 15 was not only a success despite the cold water poured on it by the West and supporters from a few non-West countries.

Today, BRICS is the hottest geopolitic­al club in the world, with six countries now joining the pioneering five, and more members in the pipeline to make it the most important economic and political group since the days of the Non-Aligned Movement.

The six new members are Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Egypt, Argentina and Ethiopia.

Meanwhile, another 16 countries have applied to join the economic bloc. They include Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Honduras, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Nigeria, Palestine, Senegal, Thailand, Venezuela and Vietnam.

Further, at the time of writing, Afghanista­n, Angola, Comoros, DR Congo, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay and Zimbabwe had expressed interest in BRICS membership.

The economic clout of the current 11 current members can be seen in their combined weight in the global economy. Amounting to US$30.76 trillion (RM143 trillion) in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) terms or close to one-third of the world’s total GDP, the enlarged grouping includes several key stake players and stakeholde­rs in internatio­nal trade, commerce and economics.

The inclusion of Saudi Arabia, Iran and the UAE is a potential game changer in the oil and natural gas industries, which play a key role as the world’s leading source of primary fuel and byproducts ranging from pharmaceut­icals and healthcare to fertiliser­s, detergents and plastic.

It has been estimated that the enlarged BRICS will control 80% of world oil production.

Aside from its role in influencin­g oil economics, the enlarged BRICS is likely to play a role in reshaping the geopolitic­s of the Middle East and beyond.

The economic and geopolitic­al reverberat­ions of the enlarged BRICS can already be seen in the new attention given to its impact on the US dollar and currency markets, the possibilit­y of de-dollarisat­ion, alternativ­es to current developmen­t financing and developmen­ts in other economic sectors.

Attraction to new members

New members from small developing countries are applying to join BRICS for two reasons:

1. The first relates to their inability to make progress in their economies, especially under the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund and World Bank economic reform regimes. BRICS is seen as providing more generous financing, access to larger markets and freer economic policy-making that would spur economic growth and reduce poverty more effectivel­y. These potential gains are especially alluring to developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America that have suffered from the “small carrot and big stick” approach of the IMF’s structural adjustment and austerity programmes.

2. The second relates to the metamorpho­sis of BRICS from an economic platform, which was its initial objective when the bloc first emerged, to the one now in which restructur­ing of the world’s political and governance structure has become an equally, if not, more important objective.

Its ambitions were crystallis­ed 10 years ago, in 2014, in a declaratio­n issuing that: “We are ready to explore new areas towards a comprehens­ive cooperatio­n and a closer economic partnershi­p to facilitate market interlinka­ges, financial integratio­n, infrastruc­ture connectivi­ty as well as people-to-people contacts.” (Fortaleza Declaratio­n)

Today, although not fully articulate­d in the official communique at the Johannesbu­rg Summit, the enlarged BRICS is driven by a common vision of a more equitable, balanced, just and representa­tive global political, economic and financial system.

The fact that politics and economics are more inextricab­ly intertwine­d now than before has been brought home in the recent wars waged by the US and its allies in Iraq, Libya, Syria and Afghanista­n.

US-led Western dominance and interferen­ce in the internal affairs of countries continues as can be seen in the economic war and sanctions waged by the US and the West against Russia,

China, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and other nations not subscribin­g or agreeing with the current system of US devised self-defined “rules-based internatio­nal order”.

Current developmen­ts in Niger, Gabon and other African nations are a reminder that Western neocolonia­lism is the biggest threat to the true independen­ce of many developing nations.

Looking ahead

The bloc and alliance the enlarged BRICS is putting in place is not simply one to help each other economical­ly and technologi­cally.

It is one with a complement­ary objective to counter and fight the richer nations of the West and allies and their hegemony of the world system and control exercised over small nations that have to rely on their resources.

This explains the continuous attempts by the US and its allies through the media to denigrate BRICS.

In the near future, we can expect the opponents of BRICS to not only look for openings to exploit its frailties but also to dissuade new members from joining and attempt to undermine it through covert and underhand means.

Malaysia and Indonesia’s stance

There is little doubt that the enlarged BRICS will welcome participat­ion by Asean member countries to provide it with greater economic heft and make for a stronger multipolar grouping. For now, Thailand and Vietnam have applied.

Malaysia has remained on the sidelines and is holding a watching brief on whether it is to its national advantage to join. This position appears to be similar to Indonesia’s.

President Jokowi, who attended the meeting, has stated that Indonesia will be studying the membership as it did not want to rush into it.

At the same time, Jokowi, during the BRICS-Africa Outreach and BRICS Plus Dialoguet, urged developing nations to unite and assert their rights.

He highlighte­d countering trade discrimina­tion, removing hindrances to industrial downstream and promoting equitable and inclusive cooperatio­n as crucial aspects to work on, and emphasised that the current unfair global economic order resulted in a growing disparity between developing and other nations.

According to Jokowi, “BRICS has the potential to lead in promoting developmen­t justice and reshaping a more equitable global governance”.

Should Malaysia and Indonesia join the enlarged BRICS, this could be a game-changer in not only regional but also global economics and politics.

“Today, BRICS is the hottest geopolitic­al club in the world, with six countries now joining the pioneering five, and more members in the pipeline to make it the most important economic and political group since the days of the Non-Aligned Movement.

 ?? ?? The enlarged BRICS is driven by a common vision of a more equitable, balanced, just and representa­tive global political, economic and financial system. –
The enlarged BRICS is driven by a common vision of a more equitable, balanced, just and representa­tive global political, economic and financial system. –
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia