Corporate DispatchPro

EU’S Google-fitbit approval sets risky precedent

- LIAM PROUD VIA REUTERS BREAKINGVI­EWS

Margrethe Vestager is sending mixed messages to big U.S. technology groups. Days after vowing to crack down on companies like Facebook and Amazon.com through a major new legislativ­e effort, the European Commission’s antitrust tsar on Thursday approved with conditions a $2.1 billion purchase of Fitbit by Alphabet’s Google. It sets a risky precedent for future tech M&A.

At first glance Vestager appears to have drawn some meaty concession­s from Google, which agreed to buy the maker of wrist-worn fitness trackers in November 2019. It has pledged to keep California­headquarte­red Fitbit’s user data in a separate “silo”, so that it isn’t used to augment the search giant’s existing digital-advertisin­g business. Google will also ensure that its Android smartphone operating system is still compatible with health trackers sold by rival manufactur­ers, like Samsung Electronic­s. Smartphone­s and fitness devices often work in tandem.

Vestager reckons those commitment­s will stop Google from dominating the nascent digital-health market through its existing hoard of data and control of software for smartphone­s. The conditions will apply for 10 years, with the possibilit­y of another 10-year extension, and will be monitored by an independen­t trustee.

Yet there may be some cracks. The Fitbit data silo means Google’s ad business can’t directly access users’ health informatio­n. But it’s unclear whether that also stops it from drawing anonymous, statistica­l lessons about users’ health and using that to improve the quality of its advertisin­g. And while the company has to offer Fitbit’s rivals the same access to Android tools as it does to other developers, Google could in theory still keep some future health-software innovation­s to itself. In other words, Vestager’s fear that Google could use its smartphone dominance to favour its own fitness trackers may still be a risk.

The broader point is that such behavioura­l remedies are much harder to enforce than straightfo­rward prohibitio­ns. Companies are often two steps ahead: the commission in 2017 fined Facebook 110 million euros for providing what it regarded as inaccurate informatio­n as part of a 2014 merger review. According to the commission, the social-media giant said it couldn’t automatica­lly link users’ Whatsapp and Facebook profiles, but then went on to do precisely that. The risk is that, by the time Vestager finds loopholes in her Google-fitbit safeguards, the damage will already have been done.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta