Malta Independent

Stronger freedom of expression

The new Media and Defamation Bill is now at its final stages as it has reached unanimous approval at committee stage.

- Owen Bonnici is the Minister for Justice, Culture and Local Government

This Bill is historic. It provides an unpreceden­ted freedom to our country’s journalist­s, media practition­ers and citizen-journalist­s and guarantees the safeguardi­ng of freedom of speech.

It builds upon crucial reforms done during the last legislatur­e through which freedom of artistic expression was strengthen­ed considerab­ly. At the time the Opposition had branded the anti-censorship bill as an exercise of ‘ ksuħat’ (stupidity). A couple of years afterwards, we were proven right.

The new media bill is the second step in the two-pronged vision for increased freedom of expression.

Reforms for a stronger democracy

Through the new media reforms, Malta has truly opened its doors to freedom of expression, thus further strengthen­ing our democracy.

During the past two years, Government has been in constant consultati­on with stakeholde­rs (including OSCE) and every stage of the discussion has contribute­d to the advancemen­t of this Bill.

We are constantly striving to further democracy in Malta, and Government is always open to engage in fruitful discussion that contribute­s to the betterment of our society.

The coming into fruition of this particular Bill can easily serve as a blueprint (a point of reference); that law should be written through wide consultati­on, and in respect of fundamenta­l rights which a modern, democratic country should safeguard.

18 principal changes

The introducti­on of this law will bring with it 18 principal changes.

Defences on libel actions are being strengthen­ed to be in line with the latest jurisprude­nce of the European Court of Human Rights. At the same time, this will continue to protect the privacy of private individual­s however this protection does not extend to public figures where what is being said has a significan­t bearing on the performanc­e of public functions of the individual.

A major advancemen­t is that criminal libel cases which are pending at the time this new law is entered into force will be dropped. Also all criminal offences will be removed from the media law and the few retained will be transporte­d to the Criminal Code. In fact, a whole list of offences in the Criminal Code which affect freedom of expression will be removed.

This Bill’s introducti­on sees that for words to be considered of a libellous nature, they must be words that cause, or are likely to cause serious harm to a person’s reputation. This aids the discourage­ment of cases concerning libel or defamation on statements which do not cause serious consequenc­es to one’s reputation. Defamation done by the spoken word and not through publicatio­n will not be a criminal offense anymore but will give space to civil action where the maximum amount for damages which can be awarded is €5,000.

There has been no increase in the amount for damages which can be awarded for a libel case, and these will remain the same as establishe­d in the current Press Act (€11,640). The media’s proportion­ality is better safeguarde­d when it comes to the awarding of damages. In this case, the Court will also be obliged to consider the effect that the payment of damages will have on the person which is ordered to pay.

This law is also encouragin­g alternativ­e dispute resolution measures when it comes to the hearings of libel and defamation cases for the terminatio­n and settlement of litigation­s such as mediation. Due to the sensitive nature of media laws, regulation­s which are done under this law will require to be approved by a Parliament resolution before they are entered into force.

A crucial aspect of this Bill is that the protection of informants will apply to each editor, publisher, author or website or broadcast operator and it is also looking to safeguard website editors, who will have additional defences over those of print and broadcasti­ng editors’ due to the specific nature of websites that receive public comments. On another note, the right of reply will remain, however non-observance of this right by the editor will give rise to civil remedies and not criminal ones.

The Code of Organisati­on and Civil Procedure will be amended so as any kind of precaution­ary measures in cases of libel cannot be issued, also the Act to regulate Electronic Communicat­ions will be amended so that words of defamation which were shown or spoken on a website and that action was taken against under the Media and Defamation Act won’t constitute as an offence against that act.

This Bill also sees to the list of publicatio­ns reporting on events which are of public interest which the public is informed about - therefore these will benefit from more liberties - will be extended. In a case when a statement has already been published or when the same statement is published multiple times, particular rules concern- ing prescripti­on and cumulative action will apply. A new article on protection against defamation of deceased people which has an effect on the living will enter into force.

Journalist­s will have the possibilit­y to form part of the Media Register, which is to be run by the media itself. The registrati­on of editors and publishers will be on a voluntary basis and will not apply for editors and publishers of websites.

The Consultati­on Process

These 18 principal changes, as mentioned earlier, were obtained through wide consultati­on with various stakeholde­rs including internatio­nal agencies, the Institute of Maltese Journalist­s and Front Kontra ċ-Ċensura and their support and constructi­ve feedback was essential in the advancemen­t of this law.

All throughout the consultati­on period, every contributi­on was considered and analysed thoroughly.

One of the proposals about which Government sought advice, was the anti-SLAPP proposal made by the Opposition. Four legal opinions by key experts in the field on the matter were published earlier this week all came to the conclusion that the Opposition’s proposal is in part legally unsustaina­ble and in the rest does not add anything to the protection which our laws already afford to journalist­s against SLAPP lawsuits in non-EU jurisdicti­ons.

Modern democracy

These reforms have soundly improved our country’s freedom of expression and are paving our way towards a more modern democratic country which sets the foundation towards a brighter future.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta