ECB reportedly flags failings in dirty-money screening at BOV

A confidential ECB report seen and reported by Reuters said Bank of Valletta had not dealt with a litany of risk management failings despite repeated warnings from the Frankfurt-based regulator stretching back to 2015.

The report — adopted by the ECB in the summer after an inspection late last year — calls for remedial measures, including assessing if BOV’s top managers are fit for their jobs and reducing exposure to risks posed by foreign clients by the end of this year.

BOV said it was strengthening its risk controls, governance structure and anti-financial crime defenses and said customers who operated in the gaming industry, a key business in Malta, were most at risk of being hit by remedial measures,

Reuters reports.

“The Bank is today engaged in a priority process - agreed with, and monitored by, its regulators - to deal with the legacy issues highlighted by the report,” BOV said in an email on Wednesday.

BOV is the main financial pillar of the Maltese economy, whose growth has been fuelled by attracting offshore gambling, financial and ship registration industries under the centre-left government of Prime Minister Joseph Muscat.

The 47-page ECB report highlights the vulnerability to suspicious transactions of the euro zone’s financial system, which has already been rocked by widely-reported money laundering scandals at some of its top banks.

A spokeswoman for the ECB declined to comment on Tuesday.

However, the ECB lacks power over anti-money laundering lapses, apart from the extreme measure of revoking a bank’s license.

Malta’s police declined to say whether they were investigating BOV, while a spokesman for the OPM said it trusted the bank.

A senior ECB official said BOV had shown “a change of attitude” with its new “de-risking” plan launched in May, but warned that Frankfurt would consider restricting BOV’s services to foreign clients and gaming companies if it again failed to shape up. It could deploy such measures as part of its remit to protect financial stability.

Italy’s UniCredit, which owns 10% of BOV, declined to comment, adding that its stake was “nonstrategic”.

Although BOV is financially solid as most of its revenues come from local mortgages and deposits, it was exposed to disproportionate risks from its foreign clients, the ECB official said.

The EU has repeatedly warned of the risks of Malta attracting the proceeds of criminal activities. Despite these warnings, the ECB report said that when foreign nationals seeking to buy passports under the scheme opened an account at BOV, the bank registered them as Maltese citizens, which reduced their risk profile.

The report said BOV’s earlier derisking strategy in 2018 had focused mainly on maintaining accounts and more than 13,000 suspicious payments, some dating back to February 2014, were still waiting to be assessed.

Meanwhile the number of highrisk foreign customers had actually risen and in many cases BOV had no information about the origins of their wealth, Reuters reported.

The ECB said BOV had no unit to identify bribery and corruption among international clients and did not keep a record of those who had payments blocked due to money laundering risks.

BOV declined to comment on specifics of its risk management systems or any customers named in the ECB report saying its dealings with regulators and clients were confidential.

ECB investigators identified a lack of checks over accounts held by Malta’s Pilatus Bank, which was shut last year after its Iranian owner Ali Sadr Hashemi Nejad was arrested in the United States on money-laundering and sanctions violation charges.

Despite warnings, BOV kept scant details about the source of wealth of Pilatus’ directors and no documentation was provided when Ali Sadr opened an account in 2014, the report said.

Pilatus did not answer to repeated calls. A lawyer for Ali Sadr did not reply to questions.

In another case, BOV allowed CenturionBet, a gambling company which the ECB said had its license withdrawn in Britain in 2009, to continue transferring money even though its license had also been revoked by Maltese authorities in 2017.

CenturionBet did not reply to Reuters questions.

Report based on situation a year ago, BOV says

In a reaction, Bank of Valletta said that the news items refer to a confidential report which was based on the situation as it was a year ago. Since then, BOV’s de-risking exercise has taken on a much wider dimension. The Bank is today engaged in a priority process - agreed with, and monitored by, its regulators - to deal with the legacy issues highlighted by the report.

The Bank made strong progress in addressing the specific issues within the relevant timelines, and is confident that its processes will be substantially enhanced as a result.

The Bank said it is currently undertaking a Transformation Programme, aimed at strengthening its IT systems and architecture, overall risk profile, internal controls framework, anti-financial crime defences and governance structure.

The Transformation Programme includes a de-risking, or business restructuring and a remediation programme.

The de-risking, or business restructuring programme, aims at exiting or re-dimensioning business lines where the risk-return ratio is unfavourable, i.e. where the risk inherent in the business is not adequately compensated by the return. The Bank is currently exiting from a number of such businesses. Concurrently, it is scaling down its international corporate deposits business, as well as its international personal banking business. Core to this de-risking programme is the criterion that customers must have an economic nexus with Malta.

The upgrade of the Bank’s anti financial crime defences is being carried out in partnership with an international consultancy firm. In conjunction with the above, the Bank is conducting a complete review and remediation exercise on all its customer files.

Another objective of the programme is to strengthen and upgrade the internal control framework in line with best international practice.

The Bank’s dealings with regulators and customers are highly confidential, and so the Bank is unable to confirm or deny any of the specific assertions being made, the bank said.