Malta Independent

Proposed redevelopm­ent of Grand Hotel Verdala recommende­d for approval

- KEVIN SCHEMBRI ORLAND

The demolition of the existing Grand Hotel Verdala in Rabat and its proposed redevelopm­ent is one of the applicatio­ns that will make its way before the Planning Authority Board on Thursday. The case officer has recommende­d that the applicatio­n be approved.

The Case Officer’s report highlights that this “is an outline developmen­t applicatio­n,” and that it includes the constructi­on of a hotel and apart-hotel with guestrooms and serviced apartments, spa, gym and facilities as well as the constructi­on of two new residentia­l blocks with private apartments. Site access would be both from Triq Inguanez and also a drop-off lay by along the hotel frontage at Triq ir-Rgħajja. The applicatio­n was originally filed back in 2017.

An Outline Developmen­t Applicatio­n is a type of planning permission which seeks to establish whether the scale and nature of a proposed developmen­t is acceptable in principle to the Authority. Subsequent to receiving this planning permission an applicant will require a full developmen­t permit to actually carry out the project. With an Outline Developmen­t Applicatio­n fewer details are required, which details will be spelt out in the full developmen­t applicatio­n.

The Superinten­dent of Cultural Heritage (SCH) has been consulted on the project.

“At the initial stage of processing of this applicatio­n, the SCH referred that the property proposed for developmen­t is located within an Area of Archaeolog­ical Importance of Mdina and Rabat. Several archaeolog­ical remains have been documented in the area and the survival of further archaeolog­ical remains cannot be excluded. There is a risk that ground disturbanc­e in this area may uncover cultural heritage features that may necessitat­e the amendment of approved plans.”

Given the high archaeolog­ical sensitivit­y of the area, while vertical extension within the previously excavated area may be considered, the extension of the basement level over unexcavate­d areas should be removed from the proposal, the SCH said. “Neverthele­ss, any approved developmen­t will require that works are archaeolog­ically monitored.”

The SCH said that any clearing or excavation are to be monitored by an archaeolog­ist who has to be approved and directed by the Superinten­dence of Cultural Heritage. It also said that any features and remains of cultural heritage value discovered or noted during all stages of the developmen­t are not to be disturbed and are to be protected in site.

The Environmen­t and Resources Authority was also consulted, and noted that the site sits on the edge of the Rabat escarpment, and falls partly outside the developmen­t zone boundary and partly within scheme. However, the whole site is committed to developmen­t and no remnant of agricultur­al land exists on site.

The latest plans as provided in the Environmen­t Impact Assessment Addendum indicate that the complex will be distribute­d in three buildings that are stepped up from three floors to seven in height along Triq ir-Rgħajja and 7 floors along Triq Santa Katerina, the ERA said.

“At the rear of the site, overlookin­g the ridge, the hotel will rise to eight floors. The entire site except for the Virtu’ Heights has been committed since the early 1970s when the hotel started its operations. The ERA notes that part of the site which falls outside the official building zone alignment, approximat­ely 1,000sqm will be developed to link the new hotel with the ‘Virtu’ Heights block. This area was previously committed by swimming pools and paving as part of the existing derelict hotel and is presently scarified following removal of these interventi­ons. A previous planning applicatio­n in 1994 granted permission for the redevelopm­ent of this area. In this respect, noting that the entire site has been compromise­d through the hotel developmen­t, no new take up of undevelope­d land is envisaged,” the ERA said.

With regards to the visual impact of the proposal, “the massing of the building due to a larger volume and bigger site coverage contrastin­g with existing buildings, will exert visual impact from most of the mid-range and panoramic views. However, when comparing the proposed replacemen­t building against the existing baseline that consists of one massive building, the ERA notes that the impact of the proposal on the prevailing landscape character would be marginally reduced,” the case officer’s report read.

“The urban design treatment of the transition point between the Rabat urban developmen­t zone and the open countrysid­e immediatel­y beyond is still evident and to an extent affects the rural landscape character and the townscape. In view that this applicatio­n is still at outline stage, it should be ensured that the final design provides a smooth transition between the two zones. This aspect shall be considered by the Planning Authority in the developmen­t consent process.”

The Environmen­t Resources Authority “acknowledg­es the fact that the location of the site is very prominent and any interventi­on will be very visually sensitive on the landscape and the skyline. The conclusion­s of the review of the EIA shows that the overall site context, previous developmen­t commitment­s on site and the limited range of expected additional impacts are such that there are no overriding reservatio­ns from an environmen­tal point of view.”

The case officer, when debating the proposal in principle, highlighte­d that the main issues revolve around the mix of uses within/outside developmen­t zone and the building height/massing. “Although the proposal involves the redevelopm­ent of a site and thus, the proposal is to be considered with respect the scheme, the Planning Directorat­e considered previous commitment­s on site. Whilst the validity of a previous 1994 applicatio­n may be argued, it is noted that the land, including areas outside developmen­t zone, has long been considered and committed for hotel developmen­t.”

As regards configurat­ion, the proposed developmen­t involves the developmen­t of residentia­l within scheme and the consolidat­ion of a hotel partly within scheme and partly outside developmen­t zone over the approved building footprint ODZ and onto an area committed for ancillary pools and hard landscapin­g ODZ. “Configurat­ion issues relate to outside the developmen­t zone. Whilst concerns were raised such that the proposed floorspace and volumes ODZ are compared to the approved profile, floorspace and volume, it is noted that as reasoned by the Environmen­t and Resources Authority no new take up of undevelope­d land is envisaged.”

As regards massing, “it is noted that internal discussion­s originally noted that a 1994 permit had already approved a building higher than the height limitation for the residentia­l block. Drawings approved in the 1994 applicatio­n indicate a height of 26m along Triq ir-Rgħajja with overlying circulatio­n cores/amenities which reach 29m. The proposed developmen­t involves a building height of 21m that is c. 5m above statutory height limitation set as 16.3m (3 floors with basement).”

The case officer has recommende­d granting the proposed applicatio­n, with a number of conditions. The main parameters being considered at this outline developmen­t stage relate to: The need for a comprehens­ive full developmen­t applicatio­n to cover the whole ex- Verdala Hotel Site including the developmen­t subject to PA141/03 wherein a visually permeable connection is to be detailed at full developmen­t stage to ensure that the developmen­t operates as one hotel; Establish developmen­t parameters in outline form including land-use, developmen­t footprint, maximum allowable floorspace and maximum allowable building height above highest street level.”

The conditions attached for the full developmen­t applicatio­n to go forward, include that the maximum allowable floorspace within scheme shall not exceed 20,856sqm above the highest street level within the developabl­e footprint, and that certain building heights will not exceed 219.8m above highest street level, among other things.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta