Malta Independent

Government ads should be relevant enough to justify public funds spent on them – Hyzler

-

The message communicat­ed by government advertisem­ents should be of sufficient relevance to justify the public funds spent on it, according to draft guidelines issued by the Office of the Commission­er for Standards in Public Life.

The guidelines, which are open for consultati­on, are intended to ensure that ministers do not spend public funds on personal or political publicity. The principles of transparen­cy and proportion­ality are used as guiding factors.

The draft guidelines come a few weeks after Hyzler found that a newspaper advert by OPM Minister Carmelo Abela was “intended only to boost the minister’s image.” Abela has refused to pay the money back – some €7,000 – arguing that no guidelines for government advertisin­g exist. Speaker Anglu Farrugia had abstained his vote regarding that report, which meant that the report on the minister was not adopted by the committee reviewing it.

The new guidelines do not set out new rules, but rather indicate how Standards Commission­er George Hyzler will interpret the Code of Ethics for Cabinet members in connection with government advertisin­g and promotiona­l material.

These include the parts of the Code of Ethics that states that ministers shall keep their roles as Cabinet members and MPs separate, as well as their roles as members of government and members of political parties. Other values taken from the Code of Ethics that are transposed into the guidelines on advertisin­g include those of diligence, transparen­cy, honesty and respect towards the impartiali­ty of the public service.

The guidelines acknowledg­e that the government has a wide discretion in the use of public funds to fulfil its duty to communicat­e with the public. This is done to provide informatio­n about matters of public interest, to contribute to public safety and to promote the awareness of rights, among others.

Government advertisin­g and promotiona­l material should legitimate­ly only be used to serve public purposes such as these.

In addition, government advertisin­g may be used to indirectly support the media in a fair and transparen­t manner, in recognitio­n of its vital role in a democratic society.

While ministers may sometimes indirectly benefit from such government advertisin­g, there is a fine line that should not be crossed. “These guidelines seek to define that line, that is to say, the principle that government advertisem­ents and promotiona­l material should not be produced to serve private or partisan political purposes.”

What is covered by the guidelines

Government advertisin­g may include: inserts and supplement­s in publicatio­ns in print and online; billboards; boosted or sponsored posts on social media; articles or opinion pieces that are placed against payment, and sponsored interviews and features on all mediums.

Communicat­ions that are normally published against payment, but which are not on any particular occasion, are still covered by these guidelines.

Government promotiona­l material may include: leaflets, brochures and flyers; calendars, diaries, and stationery; items intended to be given as gifts, such as food hampers, and accompanyi­ng material such as cards or compliment slips; greeting cards, bulk emails and bulk text messaging; videos, graphics, documents and audio clips that are produced for circulatio­n to the public by electronic means; and videos, graphics, posters and other material that is produced for presentati­on or display in particular venues.

The rules

Content should be respectful and factual. It should not include any content that is of a partisan nature.

It should not refer to a political party or include images or slogans used by a political party or individual politician­s. It should also not refer to the websites of politician­s or political parties, or to partisan social media pages.

The content should not include the names or photograph­s of ministers.

In the case of leaflets, brochures, flyers as well as videos and audio clips, these may include content referring to ministers if it is relevant to the publicatio­n and contribute­s to the achievemen­t of its legitimate objectives, and that such content is limited in relation to the rest of the content in the same publicatio­n, so as to avoid giving reasonable grounds for belief that the true aim of the publicatio­n is to promote the minister. This can only be done if the publicatio­n is not circulated or broadcast against payment.

The use of government advertisem­ents and promotiona­l material should not be excessive or extravagan­t in relation to the intended objective, while the message communicat­ed should be of sufficient relevance to justify the public funds spent on it.

Government advertisem­ents and promotiona­l material should carry official logos or otherwise make it clear that they have been produced by or for the government.

This applies in particular to advertoria­ls and sponsored interviews or programmes and any paid content. The public should be made aware that such articles have been paid for with public funds. Government-sponsored publicatio­ns should carry a declaratio­n to that effect.

Ministers should direct public funding to the media for advertisin­g purposes on the basis of fair and objective criteria.

Consultati­on

The Commission­er has issued the guidelines in draft form for consultati­on purposes before they are put into effect. Anyone who wishes to present reactions to the guidelines, including political parties, the government and the general public, is invited to do so. The consultati­on period closes on Friday 23 July 2021. After this date, the Commission­er will revise the guidelines as he considers necessary in light of the submission­s received by him, and he will publish the revised guidelines on the website of his office at https://standardsc­ommissione­r.com/

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta