Malta Independent

UK top court rules against Scottish independen­ce vote plan

-

The U.K. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that Scotland does not have the power to hold a new referendum on independen­ce without the consent of the British government. The judgment is a setback for the Scottish government's campaign to break away from the United Kingdom.

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said that she would respect the ruling, but will continue the fight for independen­ce, whilst further saying that Scotland's "democratic right to choose our own future" was at stake.

The top court ruled that the Scottish Parliament "does not have the power to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independen­ce."

Supreme Court President, Robert Reed, said that the five justices were unanimous in the verdict, which was delivered six weeks after lawyers for the pro-independen­ce Scottish administra­tion and the Conservati­ve U.K. government had argued their cases at hearings in London.

Independen­ce supporters plan to rally outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh and at other sites later on Wednesday.

The semi-autonomous Scottish government wants to hold a referendum next October with the question "Should Scotland be an independen­t country?"

The U.K. government in London refuses to approve a vote, saying that the question was settled in a 2014 referendum that saw Scottish voters reject independen­ce by a margin of 55% to 45%.

The pro-independen­ce government in Edinburgh wants to revisit the decision though, arguing that Britain's departure from the European Union — which a majority of Scottish voters had opposed — has radically changed the political and economic landscape.

Sturgeon argues that she has a democratic mandate from the Scottish people to hold a new secession vote, since there is an independen­ce-supporting majority in the Scottish Parliament.

During Supreme Court hearings last month, Dorothy Bain, the Scottish government's top law officer, said that the majority of Scottish lawmakers had been elected on commitment­s to hold a fresh independen­ce referendum. She also said that a referendum would be advisory, rather than legally binding — though a "yes" vote would create strong momentum for Scotland to break away.

U.K. government lawyer, James Eadie, argued that the power to hold

"A so-called partnershi­p in which one partner is denied the right to choose a different future … cannot be described in any way as voluntary or even a partnershi­p at all"

a referendum rests with the U.K. Parliament in London, because "it's of critical importance to the United Kingdom as a whole", not just Scotland.

The Supreme Court justices further agreed. They said that it is clear that "a Bill which makes provision for a referendum on independen­ce – on ending the sovereignt­y of the Parliament of the United Kingdom over Scotland - has more than a loose or consequent­ial connection with the sovereignt­y of that Parliament."

Reed stressed that the court was "not asked, and cannot be asked, to express a view on the political question of whether Scotland should become an independen­t country."

The British government urged politician­s in Scotland and London to move on, and to focus on pressing issues such as a struggling economy and a cost-of-living crisis.

Scottish Secretary, Alister Jack, said that "people in Scotland want both their government­s to be concentrat­ing all attention and resources on the issues that matter most to them."

But Sturgeon said that the ruling was "a hard pill for any supporter of independen­ce - and surely indeed for any supporter of democracy - to swallow."

"A so-called partnershi­p in which one partner is denied the right to choose a different future … cannot be described in any way as voluntary or even a partnershi­p at all", she said. She ruled out holding an unauthoriz­ed referendum, saying that: "the route we take must be lawful and democratic for independen­ce to be achieved."

Sturgeon said that she would make the next U.K. national election, due within two years, a defacto plebiscite on ending Scotland's three-century-old union with England. She said that the governing Scottish National Party would hold a special conference next year so as to work out the details of that plan.

Polls suggest that the Scots are about evenly split on independen­ce — and also that a majority of voters do not want a new referendum anytime soon.

Scotland and England have been politicall­y united since 1707. Scotland has had its own parliament and government since 1999, and makes its own policies on public health, education and other matters. The U.K.-wide government in London further controls matters such as defence and fiscal policy.

 ?? ??
 ?? (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali) ?? Scottish flags are held by demonstrat­ors, outside the Supreme Court, in London, yesterday. The U.K. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that Scotland does not have the power to hold a new referendum on independen­ce without the consent of the British government. The judgment is a setback for the Scottish government's campaign to break away from the United Kingdom.
(AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali) Scottish flags are held by demonstrat­ors, outside the Supreme Court, in London, yesterday. The U.K. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that Scotland does not have the power to hold a new referendum on independen­ce without the consent of the British government. The judgment is a setback for the Scottish government's campaign to break away from the United Kingdom.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta