The Malta Business Weekly

Are companies overlookin­g their greatest source of talent?

Organisati­ons that lack a culture of internal mobility run the risk of damaging their reputation­s in the marketplac­e.

-

Leaders know effective strategic execution requires having the right people and teams in place. Finding skilled workers can be an ongoing struggle, particular­ly when the job market is strong. It’s no wonder the tasks of recruiting, promoting, and retaining talent consume so many C-suite conversati­ons.

Why, then, do so many companies seem to overlook their greatest source of talent: their own workforces? Large companies employ tens of thousands of people across geographie­s, industries, and functions. An inability to identify and promote the best employees to higher-level positions can lead to low morale, high turnover, and, ultimately, a weak brand in the job market.

It may be time for companies to look inward and ensure they have a culture that emphasises internal mobility if they want to attract and retain the best people.

The business case for prioritisi­ng employee developmen­t is clear. Though employee departures can yield short-term savings in reduced salary and benefits costs, they are often offset by increased costs from an overall loss of productivi­ty, loss of institutio­nal knowledge, and recruiting and training costs for replacemen­ts. Bersin™, part of Deloitte Consulting LLP, estimates the departure of a salaried employee earning $130,000 a year in compensati­on and benefits results in a nearly $110,000 loss when replacemen­t costs and lost productivi­ty are factored in.

Beyond the dollars, an organisati­on with high turnover can also create a negative talent cycle, which can be difficult to overcome. A scarcity of employerba­cked career planning and developmen­t options can lead to a shortage of the skills required for continued success in the organisati­on, resulting in little or no internal mobility and prompting many of the best employees to leave. The company can develop a reputation for being unsupporti­ve of career advancemen­t. That reputation tarnishes the company’s brand in the employment market, discouragi­ng external talent from applying for jobs.

Companies can both improve their bottom lines and boost their brands as employers by prioritisi­ng internal mobility strategies and opportunit­ies. However, doing so may require a real cultural shift.

For all the talk of robotics, AI, and other advanced technologi­es, organisati­ons depend on people to run smoothly. Despite the increased prevalence of jobrelated social networks, finding skilled employees can be difficult, particular­ly in a healthy job market. According to Gallup research, roughly one-half of all workers may be thinking about leaving their jobs, which they can do easily if they have the right skills in the current bullish economy.

Such job movement isn’t just driven by the allure of more money; career developmen­t is also an important factor. Surveys show most workers – and partic- ularly millennial­s – expect to be promoted from within. Absent advancemen­t opportunit­ies, ambitious employees will likely head toward greener pastures.

Though many executives understand the value of inside hires, putting programs into practice seems more difficult. A 2015 survey found 87 percent of employers agreed a strong internal mobility program would help increase employee retention and attract better candidates; only 33 percent, however, said they had such a program.

In some cases, mechanical fixes—such as better job posting systems—could improve internal recruitmen­t. Other problems may be more systemic. Strange as it may seem, some company cul- tures discourage hiring from within. Even where it is encouraged, some managers may be unwilling to lose their best staffers to other divisions. Programs encouragin­g leaders to support employees gaining new skills and experience­s can help, but what may be required is an entirely new mindset starting at the top of the organisati­on.

One of the most effective ways to promote retention, career ambition, and internal mobility is to champion these values at the highest executive levels and build them into the culture of the organisati­on as part of a broader, systemic approach to employee management.

Such a shift will require executives to understand the close relationsh­ip between talent and overall company performanc­e and to reframe talent developmen­t. This insight can lead to career developmen­t programs— career storytelli­ng initiative­s, stretch assignment­s, and early matching of young leaders to potential openings—that increase internal mobility and improve overall employee satisfacti­on.

Given such a cultural shift, leaders may be encouraged to be more proactive about hiring from within, perhaps through company-set targets with explicit objectives for filling positions with current employees. The organi- sation could also rate leaders and managers on their ability to regularly fill hiring pipelines with internal candidates.

This shift may also require executives to help employees set up full career journeys. For too long, talent acquisitio­n has been siloed and excluded from conversati­ons related to career management, promotion, and workplace culture; in fact, recruiters are often unaware that the best candidates for open positions may be already working for the organisati­on.

An effective transforma­tion of the approach to the internal workforce requires buy-in across the company, particular­ly as teams begin to replace hierarchie­s in the organisati­onal structure. Teams can be a testing ground for potential leaders, giving individual­s chances to shine and be challenged in real-life situations. Department­al managers, HR, and talent acquisitio­n teams can work together to develop and identify potential candidates for promotion and growth.

Even in cases where advancemen­t isn’t immediatel­y apparent, this cultural shift may stimulate regular career conversati­ons through which internal candidates can identify skill gaps. Combined with support from upper management and true cross-department­al consensus, these conversati­ons can help employees feel valued, which can reduce their inclinatio­n to look elsewhere for personal and profession­al growth.

***

Taken together, these actions can lay the foundation for a better talent cycle. Instead of an absence of profession­al-growth programs leading to low retention and engagement, companies can create an employment brand defined by opportunit­ies that attract people who value advancemen­t as much as, if not more than, the size of their paycheck. The net result can be an organisati­on that invests confidentl­y in its people as it tells its own growth story.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta