The Malta Business Weekly

A+ for Malta from German ratings agency

-

Creditrefo­rm Rating has affirmed the unsolicite­d long-term sovereign rating of “A+” for Malta and gave the country a stable outlook.

It also affirmed Malta’s unsolicite­d ratings for foreign and local currency senior unsecured longterm debt of “A+”.

Rating Action

Neuss, 23 November

Creditrefo­rm Rating has affirmed the unsolicite­d long-term sovereign rating of “A+” for the Republic of Malta. Creditrefo­rm Rating has also affirmed Malta’s unsolicite­d ratings for foreign and local currency senior unsecured long-term debt of “A+”. The outlook is stable.

Key Rating Drivers

1. Very strong economic expansion boosting per-capita income and employment; favorable macroecono­mic performanc­e set to continue in 2018/19 but small size, high degree of openness and high exposure to cyclical industries continue to weigh on the economy’s shock-absorbing capacities

2. Although sovereign continues to be characteri­zed by a generally high quality of its institutio­nal setup, room to improve judicial system and step up anti-corruption measures; European institutio­ns have raised concerns regarding effective implementa­tion of AML/CFT rules

3. Fiscal risks stemming from compositio­n of state revenues set against prudent budget execution, underpinne­d by a steadily improving headline balance and the government’s commitment to run surpluses; debt-to-GDP ratio set to remain on a steep downward trajectory 4. Risks associated with elevated current account volatility and high external liabilitie­s are mitigated by limited external funding needs of the private sector and a positive net internatio­nal investment position

Reasons for the Rating Decision

Our assessment of Malta’s macroecono­mic performanc­e balances risks stemming from the small size of the Maltese economy coupled with a high exposure to tourism and gaming against a track record of extraordin­arily strong GDP growth, which has helped to significan­tly lift percapita income.

We thus continue to view Malta’s relatively high income levels as a credit positive. Percapita income, which posted at $41,839 (in PPP terms, IMF data) in 2017, stands well above the median of our Arated sovereigns ($33,775). We also note that GDP per capita has expanded dynamicall­y in the recent past (2013-17: +29.5%). As a result, personal wealth surpassed EU-28 levels for the first time since EU accession in 2004.

An exceptiona­lly strong growth momentum in the Maltese economy supported rapid growth in per capita income. Over the past five years, real GDP has grown by 6.8% on average, outpacing growth levels seen in the EU as a whole (average 2013-17: 1.8%) by a wide margin. In 2017, Malta’s thriving economy gained further traction, with real GDP growth edging up from 5.2 to 6.7%, marking the second highest growth rate in the euro area. Last year’s economic expansion was largely driven by net exports. In real terms, exports of goods and services increased by a robust 3.8% in 2017 (2016: +4.2%). In particular, tourism, gaming, and profession­al services continued to boost Malta’s service exports.

Drawing on BoP data, export receipts from travel were up 16.7% y-o-y, while profession­al and other business services recorded a growth rate of 9.0%. At the same time, import growth turned negative (-1.9%), responding to sharply contractin­g investment activity. After having risen by 1.7% in 2016, gross fixed capital formation dropped by 7.3% due to base effects.

Expenditur­e on transport equipment, which had been inflated by extraordin­arily high aviation investment linked to aircraft leasing corporatio­ns in the previous year, fell by 73.1% in 2017. Constructi­on investment returned to growth, expanding by 22.6% (2016: -13.7%) on the back of brisk demand for housing. Investment in dwellings continued to perform strongly, posting double-digit growth for the third consecutiv­e year. After having expanded by 26.4 and 33.9% in 2015 and 2016, dwellings investment leapt by 44.0% last year.

Furthermor­e, 2017 witnessed sustained growth in private consumptio­n. Underpinne­d by the favorable labor market developmen­t and positive wealth effects stemming from the ongoing recovery of the housing market (see below), private consumptio­n growth accelerate­d from 2.6 (2016) to 3.7% in 2017 – thereby contributi­ng 1.8 p.p. to last year’s output expansion (2016: 1.3 p.p.).

Growth prospects for 2018 and 2019 remain positive. Although we expect the Maltese economy to lose some steam, real GDP should expand by a still high 5.5% in 2018, before moderating to 5.0% in 2019.

The first half of the year has seen very robust quarterly growth rates. After recording a yearly rate of 4.7% in Q1-18, real GDP rose by 5.7% in the second quarter. Latest national accounts data supports our view that domestic demand is set to take over from net exports as the main driver of economic growth this year.

Imports and investment, which had contracted in the first quarter, saw a turnaround in Q2-18, growing by 4.6 and 12.2% (y-o-y) respective­ly. At the same time, private consumptio­n moved on a higher growth trajectory, increasing by 6.5% (Q4-17: 3.2%; Q1-18: 4.5%). Alongside upbeat consumer confidence, sustained growth in disposable incomes is set to foster private consumptio­n in 2018.

Real disposable household income should be buttressed by enduring employment and wage growth, which should more than offset the drag from gradually rising inflationa­ry pressures (2018e: 1.6%). According to Central Bank of Malta estimates, real disposable household income should go up by 4.2 and 3.8% in 2018 and 2019.

Robust consumer spending should coincide with a moderate recovery in gross fixed capital formation. As evidenced by a rapidly rising number of building permits, constructi­on investment should remain on its growth trajectory. Up from 3,947 in 2015 and 7,508 in 2016, the number of permitted dwellings (units) jumped to 9,822 last year (+30.8%). Moreover, a stronger absorption of ESI funds should bode well for investment. As illustrate­d by EU commission data, financial resources allocated to specific projects are reported to have more than doubled from 22% of planned investment (€227.4m) at the end of 2016 to 52% (€530m) by 31-Dec-17. Moreover, against the backdrop of limited spare capacity in the manufactur­ing sector, investment in equipment should bottom out this year. In Q4- 18 capacity utilizatio­n stood at 79.1%, still above historical norms (avg. 2003-17: 76.0%).

Meanwhile, we anticipate export growth to remain solid but to moderate somewhat in light of easing economic activity in Malta’s key trading partners. To be sure, tourism is set to expand further, thereby facilitati­ng exports of services. After the first nine months of the year, tourism appears to be heading towards another record year. Up to September 2018, Malta registered 2.04m foreign visitors, surpassing the previous year’s level by 15.6%.

Medium-term growth prospects remain favorable. Although potential growth may be subject to some procyclica­lity, it is estimated to be among the highest in the euro area (EU Commission 2018e: 6.1%), thanks to robust TFP growth and a well-performing labor market.

Last year, the unemployme­nt rate marked a new all-time low, falling from 4.7 (2016) to 4.0%. Concurrent­ly, employment growth, which had averaged at an already high 4.4% over 2014-16, came in at 5.2% in 2017, making the Maltese labor market the most dynamic in the euro area. Job creation was particular­ly strong in profession­al services and in the ICT sector, where employment edged up by 11.7 and 7.1% respective­ly.

Going into 2018, the labor market situation continued to improve. At the latest count, the unemployme­nt rate stood at 3.8% (Q2-18), while employment growth came in at 5.6%. Strong employment gains were facilitate­d by positive net migration of foreign workers and a steadily rising participat­ion rate (15-64y).

Since Q2-15, Malta’s participat­ion rate has increased by 4.4 p.p. (EA-19: +1.0 p.p.), recently reaching a historic high. Standing at 73.4% in Q2-18, the Maltese participat­ion rate was on par with the euro area (73.5%). Thus, structural reforms with regard to childcare and pensions appear to have paid off. To lift participat­ion rates of women and the elderly population, the Maltese government has extended the provision of free childcare and adopted various measures to encourage later retirement (i.e. gradual rise in retirement age, benefits to extend working careers).

Although job creation should continue over the next two years, we expect employment growth to shift into a lower gear in light of increasing­ly tight labor markets. EU Commission survey data already points to pronounced labor shortages. As of Q4-18, the share of respondent NFCs from the industry (40.9%) and service sectors (37.8%), citing staffing issues to be a restrictin­g factor to the production process, was significan­tly higher than in the euro area as a whole (16.6%; 17.8%).

Partly due to the influx of foreign labor, we have not observed excessivel­y rising wages so far. According to AMECO data, real compensati­on per employee has been more or less flat over recent years (2015-17: +0.4%). Coupled with gains in labor productivi­ty, wage developmen­ts contribute­d to improving cost competitiv­eness as mirrored by real unit labor costs, which have fallen by 2.0% in 201517, comparing well to key trading partners Germany (+0.2%), France (+0.2%) and Italy (-1.6%).

While macroecono­mic risks associated with deteriorat­ing costcompet­itiveness appear limited at the moment, a disorderly Brexit, as well as changes to the internatio­nal tax environmen­t, represent downside risks to the economy’s medium-term outlook. Having said this, the probabilit­y of a hard Brexit has subsided more recently, as the EU and UK have reached a technical agreement on the terms and conditions. Yet, risks remain elevated as we view it to be highly uncertain whether parliament will endorse the arrangemen­t.

A hard Brexit may have adverse effects on external demand, in particular on tourism as citizens from the UK remained the single largest group of visitors last year. We acknowledg­e that the Maltese tourism sector has reduced its reliance on visitors from the UK over the last decade, as the share of British tourists fell from 35.2 to 24.7% between 2008 and 2017. Also, we concur with CBM that Malta may succeed in attracting companies that seek to relocate outside the UK (e.g. in the financial sector).

Likewise, a comparativ­ely high exposure to sectors we consider as cyclical, or sensitive to a changing regulatory environmen­t, increases the vulnerabil­ity of the Maltese economy. While the industrial share in GDP is one of the lowest in the EU-28, the tourism sector plays a pivotal role in the Maltese economy. The World Travel and Tourism Council estimates that travel and tourism directly contribute­d 12.4% to GDP in 2017 (in nominal terms) – one the highest shares in Europe.

Furthermor­e, we note that Malta has become a favorite jurisdicti­on for e-gaming providers in recent years. As highlighte­d by Malta’s gaming authority, gross value added in the gaming industry grew by roughly 40% between 2014 and 2017, accounting for 10.0% of GDP last year. Thus, tighter regulation of gaming activities on the European level could dampen growth going forward.

The sovereign’s creditwort­hiness continues to reflect the generally high quality of institutio­nal conditions. Assessing the World Bank’s latest edition of the Worldwide Governance Indicators, Malta’s performanc­e compares relatively well with similarly rated peers.

Regarding the WGI government effectiven­ess, which captures the quality of policy formulatio­n and implementa­tion, Malta was placed at rank 41 out of 209 economies – standing on par with the median of our A-rated sovereigns. What is more, Malta outperform­ed most A-rated peers when it comes to the perception of the extent to which public power is exercised for private gain, and the quality of contract enforcemen­t, property rights, and courts.

Taking a longer-term perspectiv­e, the sovereign’s performanc­e on the indicators rule of law and control of corruption appears to have weakened somewhat over the last decade. Since 2008, Malta has slipped from rank 18 (rule of law) and 39 (control of corruption), to rank 32 and 49 respective­ly (Amedian: rank 41; 57). The first pillar ‘institutio­ns’ of the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiv­eness Index underscore­s some deteriorat­ion in the institutio­nal framework, as Malta fell from rank 29 to 33 in 2017-18, while slipping from rank 50 to 56 and 15 to 22 as regards judicial independen­ce and strength of auditing and reporting standards respective­ly.

Further corroborat­ing our view of a relative deteriorat­ion of institutio­nal quality, the European Parliament published a report in Jan-18, underscori­ng that Malta has scope to improve the implementa­tion of anti-money laundering and anti-corruption rules.

Following the murder of investigat­ive journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia, a delegation of the EP visited Malta in Dec-17 to assess the state of rule of law, as well as the implementa­tion of European AML provisions. After having met with local authoritie­s, journalist­s and NGOs, the mission report calls, among others, for increased transparen­cy on the government’s “citizenshi­p for investment program”, revisions to the Whistleblo­wer Protection Act, and the initiation of formal investigat­ions against officials accused in the Panama Papers.

In July 2018, the European Banking Authority raised concerns on supervisor­y practices of the Financial Services Authority and the Financial Intelligen­ce Analysis Unit in relation to Pilatus Bank, which lost its bank license in Nov18. EBA identified weaknesses pertaining to the authorizat­ion process of credit institutio­ns and the effectiven­ess of AML/CFT systems. The Commission has thus requested the FIAU to enhance banking supervisio­n (8-Nov-18).

Maltese authoritie­s have pushed ahead with reforms aiming to strengthen the enforcemen­t of AML provisions. To make MFSA a more efficient, proactive, and dynamic regulator, an amendment to the MFSA act (Bill No. 49) is currently in the parliament­ary process. At the same time, FIAU continues to implement its action plan. We note that efforts to improve internal governance procedures and risk assessment methodolog­ies, as well as to increase human resources are ongoing, while it remains to be seen whether the measures will prove effective in mitigating the identified deficienci­es in a sustainabl­e manner. EBA envisaged carrying out an on-site visit in 2019.

In general, Malta benefits from EU/EMU membership, involving the adoption of common standards and rules, access to European cohesion funds, and significan­t trade integratio­n. However, being the smallest member of the currency union, we believe that economic developmen­ts in Malta only have a limited impact on the ECB’s monetary policy stance. We also continue to observe a sizeable interest rate differenti­al with the euro area, pointing to persisting inefficien­cies in monetary policy transmissi­on.

Meanwhile, the business environmen­t continues to be impeded by cumbersome administra­tive procedures. The World Bank affirms the bureaucrat­ic business environmen­t in its Doing Business report 2019. Businesses are confronted with a comparativ­ely heavy administra­tive burden, as Malta remains at rank 84 out of 190 economies, with the most pressing challenges being the procedures for starting businesses (rank 103), insolvency resolution (rank 121), and property registrati­on (rank 151).

Moreover, infrastruc­ture bottleneck­s continue to be an obstacle to doing business, as highlighte­d by the World Economic Forum’s most recent global competitiv­eness report. Malta’s performanc­e on the sub-index ‘infrastruc­ture’ fell significan­tly short of most European peers. Being placed at rank 52, only Romania (55) and Bulgaria (58) scored lower on that count.

To be sure, simplifyin­g administra­tive procedures and improving the transport infrastruc­ture remain high on the government agenda. We notice that remarkable progress has been achieved in accelerati­ng court procedures. As shown by the 2018 EU Justice Scoreboard, the time needed to resolve cases has almost halved from 866 to 446 days between 2010 and 2016. The planned judicial reform could further accelerate court procedures.

What is more, in order to tackle infrastruc­ture gaps, the Maltese parliament approved the government’s plan to upgrade the country’s road network. The €700m seven-year road works project will commence in 2019 and the envisaged investment­s will be planned, overseen, and implemente­d by a newly-establishe­d government agency (Infrastruc­ture Malta).

We regard Malta’s healthy and improving public finances as a key credit strength. After the budget balance had turned positive in 2016 for the first time in 35 years, the headline surplus rose from 0.9 to 3.5% of GDP last year. Thus, Malta recorded the highest fiscal surplus in the euro area in 2017. In addition, the final budgetary outcome was significan­tly higher than envisaged in draft budget 2018, which had targeted a surplus of 0.8% of GDP on the general government level.

Last year’s budgetary outperform­ance was mainly a result of higher-than-anticipate­d-revenues from Malta’s IIP (2.2% of GDP) and strong nominal GDP growth, which translated into briskly growing government revenues. As a result, the revenue side contribute­d the bulk (1.7 p.p. GDP) to last year’s improvemen­t in the fiscal balance.

Total government receipts expanded by 14.3% on the year, driven by double-digit increases in both tax and non-tax revenues. Taxes on income and wealth benefited from record-high tourism earnings and robust private consumptio­n, increasing at a rate of 13.4% y-o-y (2016: +11.8%).

Net social security contributi­ons were up 9.9% (2016: 7.2%), mirroring buoyant labor market performanc­e. Meanwhile, government expenditur­e lagged revenue growth, expanding by 6.8%. While stagnating public investment (-0.9%) and falling interest expenses (-5.3%) curbed spending growth, intermedia­te consumptio­n rose by 14.6%, reflecting costs associated with Malta’s EU presidency, as well as higher outlays on health and longterm care.

The steadily improving budget balance coupled with strong GDP growth has contribute­d to a significan­t reduction in government debt in recent years. Falling from 56.3 (2016) to 50.9%, the government’s debt-to-GDP ratio declined for the fourth consecutiv­e year in 2017. Thus, public debt stood almost 20 p.p. below its peak in 2011 (70.1% of GDP).

Given the favorable fiscal outlook and robust growth prospects, government debt should remain on a steep downward trajectory over the coming years, with the debt-toGDP ratio presumably approachin­g the 40%-mark by 2020. In the same vein, contingent liability risks should continue to recede. Down from a comparativ­ely high 13.7% of GDP, contingent liabilitie­s fell to 9.6% of GDP last year, mainly reflecting the expiration of a state guarantee to ElectroGas, and are expected to fall further (SP 18, 2018e: 8.9% of GDP).

In our opinion, Malta will sustain a positive headline balance in 2018, although we expect the surplus to decrease mainly due to the projected decline in IIP receipts, squeezing the revenue side of the budget. According to DBP 19 projection­s, IIP receipts can be expected to fall to 1.5% of GDP in 2018 and below 1.0% of GDP in 2019.

We also assume that tax receipts will evolve less dynamicall­y than in 2017, mirroring tax reliefs for SMEs and individual­s with earnings of less than €60,000. At the same time, a one-off capital transfer is set to put some pressure on government expenditur­es.

State-owned Malta Air Travel services will receive funds in the amount of €63.5m (0.5% of GDP) to acquire landing slots from Air Malta. Budgetary developmen­ts in the first half of the year support our view that the government may well achieve its fiscal target of 1.1% of GDP this year. After six months, the budget balance posted a surplus of €105.9m equivalent to 1.8% of GDP.

Looking ahead, the Maltese government should remain committed to sound public finances, with the budget surplus remaining broadly stable at 1.2% of GDP in 2019. As laid out in its draft budget 2019, the government intends to implement some measures to address housing affordabil­ity and pension adequacy.

Most importantl­y, authoritie­s have allocated higher funds to investment. Public investment is set to increase gradually from 2.3 (2017) to 3.6% of GDP next year, driven by higher spending on healthcare, transport, and education projects. However, additional spending should be offset by declining interest expenses, as well as savings stemming from the ongoing spending review and the 2016 pension reform.

In the absence of a major policy shift, fiscal sustainabi­lity risks appear moderate at present. Neverthele­ss, Malta faces some challenges regarding the stability of public finances. Corporate income tax, which tends to fluctuate with the economic cycle, makes up for a high proportion of tax revenues.

In 2017, taxes on corporate income and profits accounted for 14.8% of total government revenue, which compares relatively high by European standards. Apart from slowing growth, a changing internatio­nal tax environmen­t could negatively impact CIT revenues.

On 15 March 2018, the European parliament voted in favor of an EC proposal to re-launch the Common Consolidat­ed Corporate Tax Base. Should a CCCTB eventually be implemente­d, this would probably hamper profit shifting of MNEs to Malta and thereby narrow the country’s tax base. The past two years have also shown that forecasts on future IIP proceeds are subject to significan­t uncertaint­y. In the event IIP revenues fall more sharply than currently expected, this could presumably have an adverse impact on the budget balance. That said, the budget balance net of IIP receipts should remain in surplus.

Malta’s large banking system harbors limited contingent liability risks, in our view. Internatio­nal banks, predominan­tly engaged in interbank and non-resident lending, account for 205.4% of GDP in 2017 (CBM data, almost half of bank total assets).

By contrast, core domestic banks with assets amounting to 206.6% of GDP stand for the bulk of lending to Maltese households and NFCs. Given the high degree of interconne­ctedness with Malta’s real economy, the financial constituti­on of CDBs is, in our opinion, of greater importance with regard to Malta’s fiscal sustainabi­lity.

As highlighte­d by CBM, CDBs display strong liquidity metrics and capital buffers. While the LCR increased from 164.4 to 183.8%, the CET1 ratio improved from 13.6 (2016) to 14.7% in 2017. What is more, CDBs continue to exhibit a stable funding base (79.4% customer deposits) and enjoy relatively high profitabil­ity. Standing at 0.7%, CDBs’ return on assets remained above the euro area average of 0.5% last year.

At the same time, asset quality continued to improve on the back of favorable macroecono­mic conditions, with the NPL ratio decreasing from 5.3 to 4.1%. Neverthele­ss, asset quality remains a challenge in some segments. Impaired assets are in particular concentrat­ed in the real estate and constructi­on sector, which accounted for only 6.4% of loans outstandin­g in 2017, but represente­d more than one third (36.5%) of the total NPL stock.

Although we consider Maltese banks to be generally sound, their growing exposure to the domestic housing market warrants close monitoring. Strong economic activity, positive net migration, and fiscal incentives such as the government scheme for first-time buyers continue to boost house prices and mortgage lending.

Since the beginning of 2015, the volume of outstandin­g mortgages has been growing at yearly rates between 6 and 11%, fueled by rising house prices (2014-17: +17.5%). In Q1 and Q2-18, house prices continued on their upward trajectory, increasing by 5.6 and 5.7% y-o-y respective­ly. While mortgage lending is growing briskly, lending to companies is recovering only slowly.

After having contracted for three years, the outstandin­g credit volume to the NFC sector turned the corner in Mar18 and continued to post positive y-o-y growth in Sep-18 (+5.6%).

In general, Malta’s corporate sector has shifted away from bank lending to alternativ­e funding sources in recent years. In particular, the role of intrasecto­ral lending has substantia­lly increased in light of relatively high NFC interest rates.

According to CBM data, intrasecto­ral loans were the most important funding source of debt funding in Q2-18, accounting for 46.1% of total corporate debt (banks loans: 22.5%). SMEs’ access to finance could benefit from the newly establishe­d Maltese Developmen­t Bank going forward.

Risks related to Malta’s external position are broadly balanced. Potential vulnerabil­ities associated with the large stock of external liabilitie­s are tempered by the relatively low external debt of the domestic private sector, and sustained current account surpluses.

It should be pointed out that Malta’s external balance continues to be characteri­zed by frequent data revisions and a high degree of volatility. Last year, the current account surplus almost doubled from 7.0 (2016) to 13.8% of GDP. Last year’s improvemen­t was mostly explained by a strengthen­ing in the trade in goods balance. Owing to weak import demand in the context of last year’s slump in investment, the deficit of trade in goods narrowed from 18.8 to 12.2% of GDP.

Looking ahead, the current account surplus should moderate somewhat due to the weaker external demand and strengthen­ing imports. Still, we expect Malta to run current account surpluses well above 10% of GDP over the next two years.

Malta’s external balance should continue to benefit from earlier measures, which have significan­tly reduced the economy’s reliance on fuel imports. Increasing energy efficiency and Malta’s integratio­n into the European electricit­y grid via the Malta-Sicily interconne­ctor in 2015 helped to bring down mineral fuel imports, which dropped sharply from 30.3 to 15.9% of GDP between 2014 and 2017.

Meanwhile, the economy’s net internatio­nal investment position remains highly positive and further increased in 2017. Amounting to 62.6% of GDP, Malta’s NIIP was the highest in the EU28 last year. Underlying gross positions were significan­tly larger. In 2017, external assets and liabilitie­s totaled at 2145.4 and 2082.9% of GDP respective­ly, mainly reflecting the large size of the domestic financial sector.

However, we note that the external funding needs of the private sector are not excessivel­y high. Gross external debt excluding debt liabilitie­s of financial institutio­ns and deposit takers made up for 75.7% of GDP last year.

Rating Outlook and Sensitivit­y Our Rating outlook on the longterm sovereign rating is stable, as we assume that the risk situation underlying the key factors affecting sovereign credit risk – including macroecono­mic performanc­e, institutio­nal structure, fiscal sustainabi­lity, and foreign exposure – is likely to remain fundamenta­lly unchanged over the next twelve months.

We could lower the rating if medium-term GDP growth falls significan­tly short of our current expectatio­ns. Its very high degree of trade openness (2017 trade-toGDP ratio: 251.2%) leaves the economy susceptibl­e to slowing growth in the global economy and in particular in the EU.

Given the economy’s strong linkages to the British economy, a hard Brexit remains a downside risk to our growth projection­s. In our view, a disorderly exit of the UK from the EU could have serious adverse effects on service exports and in turn on GDP growth.

Likewise, changes in global tax standards or rising protection­ism could endanger Malta’s attractive­ness for FDI and also have negative repercussi­ons on the state’s revenue base.

That said, downward pressure on the rating could also arise if we observe significan­t fiscal slippages coupled with a reversal in the debt trend.

Conversely, we could raise our sovereign rating if medium-term growth turns out to be substantia­lly higher than in our baseline scenario, or if public finances improve on a sustainabl­e basis, thus resulting in a steeper-thanantici­pated downward trend of general government debt.

Moreover, we could upgrade our rating if structural reforms lead to a significan­t improvemen­t in institutio­nal quality and in the business environmen­t

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta