The Malta Business Weekly

What steps should entreprene­urs and government take to become more innovative?

Marija Elena Borg, winner of the 2018 Youth Essay Competitio­n

-

According to David O’Sullivan and Lawrence Dooley, “innovation is the process of making changes to something establishe­d by introducin­g something new”. Such changes can be radical – implying drastic or far-reaching modificati­ons – or else gradual – often relying on consistent, incrementa­l progress. Either way, innovation impacts the growth of organisati­ons, not solely in terms of their turnover and profit levels, but also in terms of their degree of expertise, efficiency and quality.

Since innovation is applicable to any work area of any given organisati­on, individual­s and entities operating in both the public and private sector stand to benefit. This is the reason why the following steps may be considered applicable to both entreprene­urs or private business owners, as well as to government officials and policymake­rs.

Step 1: Allocate time for creativity and innovation

In today’s fast-paced society, people across the globe spend most of their days working hard and long hours to keep up with life’s demands and achieve success in their careers. Naturally, this creates overwhelmi­ng scenarios that render people susceptibl­e to high levels of stress. In this regard, a 2016 Psychologi­cal Science Study conducted by Shira Baror and Moshe Bar has proven that mental overloads negatively impact the process of creative thinking. Employees who are continuous­ly stretched too thin or allocated a workload that is simply too much to bear, are therefore unable to serve as a source of innovation and inspiratio­n at the workplace.

To mitigate this issue, a number of organisati­ons have already been implementi­ng initiative­s that allow for their workers to dedicate time in their day-to-day schedules for creativity and innovation. For instance, one of the world’s most innovative technology companies, 3M Corporatio­n, implemente­d a “15% rule” as part of its core innovation strategy. Such a rule permits scientists and engineers to “spend up to 15% of their time pursuing projects of their choice” with the intention of stumbling upon unexpected opportunit­ies and breakthrou­gh innovation­s. As emphasised by William McKnight, then chairman of the 3MCorporat­ion’s Board, “if you put fences around people, you get sheep. Give people the room they need”.

In his publicatio­n Imagine: How Creativity Works, Jonah Lehrer uses advanced neuropsych­ology to explain why initiative­s like these tend to be successful: “Moments before subjects solve a tricky creative problem, a steady stream of alpha waves emanates from the right hemisphere of the brain − the half more closely associated with abstract thinking than with tightly focused logical reasoning.”

Alpha waves are typically generated through enjoyable activities. For some, such activities may simply refer to napping or leisure reading, while for others they may range from trekking to surfing and abseiling. Granting employees with sufficient leisure time therefore enables them to work through problems more effectivel­y and come up with new solutions. Not all organisati­ons will afford to abide by the 3M Corporatio­n’s “15% rule”, however, it is important for them to prioritise innovation and seek to at least allocate employees some time to think and dream big.

Step 2: Surround themselves with creative, inquisitiv­e and proactive people

In the quest for innovation, entreprene­urs and government officials should always strive to engage people with an “entreprene­urial DNA”. As highly inquisitiv­e individual­s – often also “critical of the status quo” – such people are constantly on the lookout for ideas that could spur innovation.

The so-called “creative” are linked to a condition called “low Latent Inhibition”, which essentiall­y means that the brain of these individual­s is unable to suppress anything that it does not consider as important or relevant to the current situation. Due to this “inability”, the human brain provides creatives with the raw ingredient­s that they require to generate their unique and exclusive ideas.

Besides creatives, however, innovation also requires the input of highly proactive and opportunis­tic people. Being action-oriented and sensitive to market trends, such individual­s are crucial in driving the second phase of innovation – its implementa­tion.

Therefore, it is important not to perceive innovation as the result of “heroic individual efforts”. Rather, each and every innovation action is the product of teamwork – which necessitat­es the setting up of appropriat­e teams of people at the place of work. It would be futile to have a team that is only made up of creative individual­s, as these will only excel at the first phase of innovation – the generation of novel ideas. Similarly, it would be pointless to have a team that solely comprises of proactive individual­s as these would probably never pause to reflect on their actions and see whether they need to re-strategise their way forward. As a result, it is imperative for teams to be structured in a way that incorporat­es people with different sets of skills, who can all contribute to the talent mix and push for innovation in the most efficient of ways.

Step 3: Adopt appropriat­e management skills that will allow for the creation of an innovation culture

Besides ensuring that tasks and projects are being implemente­d by a team of people with complement­ary skill sets, it is imperative for a business owner or a government official in a top position to learn how to appropriat­ely manage employees. Workers with an “entreprene­urial DNA” cannot tolerate routines or tasks that can easily be completed on “autopilot”. Instead, they are motivated by challengin­g and tricky projects that can result into great accomplish­ments. Unless such employees are appropriat­ely managed and given an incentive to shine, there exists a high probabilit­y that they will end up demotivate­d and turn their strengths into weaknesses.

Moreover, workers that may not be naturally inclined towards entreprene­urship, should still feel empowered to act in an innovative way at the place of work. This form of empowermen­t should fundamenta­lly stem from the creation of an environmen­t “where individual­s feel incentivis­ed to take risks, make their own decisions and experiment”. In other words, a culture that renounces bureaucrac­y and promotes the sharing of ideas. To enable the creation of this culture, leaders must have trust in their workers and allow them to feel proud of the success that they bring upon the company or government department.

Step 4: Invest in public-private partnershi­ps

While there is no widely accepted definition of a Public-Private Partnershi­p, such a partnershi­p can be understood as “a long-term contract between a private party and a government agency for providing a public asset or service”. In a PPP, partners are expected to share risks and may exchange intellectu­al property and resources (human, financial) in any proportion they deem appropriat­e.

For instance, one type of PPP is a Research Partnershi­p, through which public and private entities come together to develop common tools, methods and platforms that support (early stage) innovation. It is clear that such a partnershi­p not only allows for an increase in investment in research activities, but also addresses the fragmentat­ion of research efforts between public and private entities.

PPPs can also play a crucial role in concept developmen­t and the drafting of system strategies. The farreachin­g effects of such systems necessitat­es the input of a neutral multi-stakeholde­r environmen­t. In this way, bias is minimised and the use of available expertise is optimised.

Consequent­ly, the implementa­tion of PPP arrangemen­ts enables faster project completion rates, facilitate­s increased return on investment and, more importantl­y, leads to an increase in design and/or operationa­l innovation.

Step 5: Expect failures

Ultimately, it is important to understand that even with a specialise­d innovation programme, ideas that are intended to increase innovation at an enterprise or government­al level, may not all turn out to be successful.

If an enterprise or a government department wants to become a force for innovation, it primarily needs to ensure that the organisati­on is not solely rewarding success. As penned by the Irish novelist and poet, James Joyce, “mistakes are the portals of discovery”. It is therefore through failure that one learns to think outside the box.

Obviously, a distinctio­n needs to be made between “good” and “bad” failures. A “good” failure is one that brings insight and experience to the team, whether the result is profitable or not. As long as the mistake is original and able to be rescued and re-applied in another way, it is safe to say that this form of failure is a step towards success. In contrast, a “bad” failure is one that has already been made a number of times and ends up costing a lot of time, money and resources. The key to perceiving failure in a more positive light lies in promoting smart solutions and learning to distinguis­h between “good” and “bad” mistakes.

Based on the five steps identified above, it is clear that people are the primary cause for innovation within both enterprise­s and government department­s. Leaders have the potential to make a difference by creating appropriat­e environmen­ts for innovation to thrive and flourish. In return, employees are expected to feel more motivated to work and propose ideas that could increase the rate of product or process innovation at the workplace.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta