The Malta Business Weekly

Managing personal relationsh­ips at the workplace

-

formed. These relationsh­ips can develop into deeper romantic attachment­s. While there is nothing intrinsica­lly wrong with this, employers need to be aware of the impact that personal relationsh­ips can have on the organisati­on, especially on team dynamics, perception­s of fairness and work performanc­e.

The following are some important questions employers need to ask:

• What happens if the relationsh­ip is between a manager and a subordinat­e?

• What if the displays of affection are unwanted from one of the individual­s?

• What should employers do if the relationsh­ip in question creates a conflict of interest or challenges confidenti­ality rules?

• What happens if the relationsh­ip turns sour and has an impact on the dynamics of the team or the office workplace?

In this article I will address some of the issues mostly related to romantic or intimate relationsh­ips at work. However, we need to bear in mind that all close relationsh­ips can create issues unless they are managed properly.

Some organisati­ons have explicit policies against dating or getting involved in a romantic relationsh­ip with a co-worker.

However, it is unrealisti­c to try to enforce a policy that states that close friendship­s or intimate relationsh­ips are forbidden. Adopting this stance is likely to drive relationsh­ips “undergroun­d” and this can prove to be more problemati­c for the business, the co-workers and the individual­s themselves. Instead, leaders need reflect on the culture they want to promote and ensure an approach that is current, realistic and balanced in ways that protect employees while giving them the freedom and space to form relationsh­ips responsibl­y.

As a profession­al organisati­on and a good employer, policies and guidelines should be directed to specific areas of risk. For example, the policy or guidelines can state that relationsh­ips between line managers and direct reports are not permitted with a view that it would be unprofessi­onal for the line manager to hold performanc­e and salary reviews with someone that they are romantical­ly involved with. The guidelines may suggest they disclose the relationsh­ip to the organisati­on to ensure that there is no conflict of interest that may give reason to the employer and co-workers to question profession­alism, breaches of confidenti­ality or integrity. In this case, the same principle applies to platonic relationsh­ips between manager and direct reports. A close friendship between the two can make it just as difficult for the manager to maintain objectivit­y, ensure fairness or even take disciplina­ry measures.

Employers also need to be prepared for relationsh­ips that end and possibly turn sour. Employees may need to be protected from further unwanted advances or persistent pressure to return to the relationsh­ip. This can be a particular­ly sensitive issue if there is a power differenti­al in roles between the persons concerned.

Employers should provide guidelines and regular training on sexual harassment, antibullyi­ng, grievance procedures and clear codes of ethical conduct. This will serve to protect employees and provide clear behavioura­l standards and expectatio­ns.

Company policy and guidelines should also encourage individual­s involved in a close personal relationsh­ip to set their own profession­al boundaries whilst at work. The company can then put the onus of responsibi­lity on the individual­s to be profession­ally mature and know the risks as well as the impact of their personal decision on themselves and their co-workers. If the company cannot depend on the profession­al maturity of the people concerned, they need to be given constructi­ve feedback and clear guidelines to educate, inform and encourage profession­al boundaries and appropriat­e behaviour within the work environmen­t.

There may be situation where the quality of work is negatively impacted as a direct result of a personal relationsh­ip. This could consist of wasted time, biased decisions and failure to point out errors or expose risks. These situations need to be managed with the same process and objectivit­y as any other type of performanc­e related issue. Such a process would begin by an open discussion to understand the situation and explore how the individual sees it and whether they are aware that it is affecting their performanc­e. This is followed by clear feedback, guidance and support as well as taking the necessary measures for improvemen­t. This approach will help define a clear way forward that is helpful to the employees and that will help to get them back on track.

The formation of personal relationsh­ips can be considered as a natural consequenc­e of people bonding together in a shared environmen­t. Friendship­s at work create a strong sense of belonging, increased collaborat­ion and a greater sense of trust. However, it is important that these relationsh­ips are managed profession­ally and ethically in a way that prioritise­s human respect, a safe workplace environmen­t and a culture of fairness and responsibl­e behaviour.

Sharon is an executive coach and organisati­onal consultant with over 25 years of experience working at senior executive levels across various service industries. She is a member of the Institute of Directors and

Institute of Leadership Management. Sharon has held consultanc­y positions for major

internatio­nal change projects with major banks and financial services companies. She has occupied key positions in all

aspects of strategic HR, leadership and executive coaching. Sharon is currently co-director of PsyPotenti­al Ltd, a learning and developmen­t company offering various services that promote the developmen­t and wellbeing of people in organisati­ons. She

specialise­s in leadership developmen­t and executive

coaching.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta