The Malta Independent on Sunday

When the Maltese were tu Australia: the children of B

-

Albert Galea With 175,000 people of Maltese descent living in Australia as of 2016, the Antipodes today remain one of the largest centres of Maltese expatriate­s on the planet. Indeed the large scale movement of Maltese immigrants into Australia can be traced back to 1949, when the Maltese people were granted the possibilit­y of travelling to Australia as part of the ‘assisted passage’ scheme. This is not to say, however, that before 1949 there had been no efforts to get from Malta to Australia. On the contrary, in fact, the early history of Maltese migration to Australia has produced some of the most intriguing and fascinatin­g tales of Malta’s immigratio­n history as a whole.

Possibly the most legendary event of all occurred in 1916, when 214 Maltese unknowingl­y and unwittingl­y sailed into Australian waters and became the central target of a country-wide political campaign. In order to truly understand the dynamics behind this event, however, a certain element of context must first be provided.

Whilst the Australia of the 1940s, 50s and 60s may have been very receptive to the concept of immigratio­n, this was certainly not the case at the turn of the 20th century. There was a far-reaching debate on the subject, with working class unions facing off against the country’s elite on the subject.

However, even the staunchest of pro-immigratio­nists believed that these new settlers had to be ‘racially adequate’. Australian immigratio­n policy throughout the early 20th century – and, in fact, up to the aftermath of the Second World War – was based on the principle of race and came from one document: the Immigrant Restrictio­n Act, which is better known as the ‘White Australia Policy’.

Implemente­d in 1901, the Act is widely reputed to have been passed with the intention of upholding a ‘whites only’ immigratio­n policy. It would do so in the years to come through the administra­tion of a dictation test, for which all new arrivals had to sit and which consisted of 50 words from any European language. Whether or not the test was applied was at the discretion of the Immigratio­n Official; as was the language in which it was administer­ed. Those who failed the test automatica­lly became ‘prohibited immigrants’ and were thus barred from entering the country.

Maltese immigratio­n to Australia in this context had been sporadic and minimal at best. The first organised effort to take a group of Maltese to the Antipodes onboard the SS Nuddea in 1883 had ended in utter and complete disaster and by 1911, only 248 out of Australia’s population of 4.5 million were Maltese-born.

Despite their minimal presence, however, archival documents show that there was a certain level of animosity against the Maltese within the working class. Letters exchanged between trade union leaders and state representa­tives show that the working class considered the Maltese as an inferior people who, due to their readiness to work long hours for a low wage, would only serve to reduce the standard of living.

One union official, for instance, described the Maltese as “the cheapest semi-white labour known”. One Walter Geard, the secretary of the Zeehan Branch of the Amalgamate­d Miner’s Associatio­n, was particular­ly vociferous in his protests against the Maltese, saying that the Maltese were “very undesirabl­e immigrants” and that it was a travesty that they were allowed to compete with “white Australian­s” in the workplace. Incidental­ly, Geard underlined the word ‘white’ in his letter, probably in an effort to add further emphasis on who he considered as ‘white’ and who he didn’t. Geard was adamant: he and his union were determined to keep men such as the Maltese away from Zeehan, despite the Maltese efforts to pass of as “white or something near it” by entering into “a couple of mixed marriages with whites”.

Such was the hostility against working class Maltese immigrants, that by 1914 even Gerald Strickland was dissuading Maltese from emigrating to Australia.

World War One made for an even more polarising immigratio­n debate in the Antipodes. Australia, despite being on the other side of the planet, provided soldiers for the Western Front in France, but as the enormity of Australian casualties on the Western Front became known in Australia, and no quick end to the war in sight, it seemed likely that the number of men volunteeri­ng would steadily fall.

Universal military training for Australian men aged between 18 and 60 had been compulsory since 1911, but enlistment to serve overseas was voluntary. Amidst pressure from the British government to ensure that Australia’s overseas divisions were not depleted, Prime Minister William Hughes, better known as Billy Hughes, decided to call a non-binding referendum on whether or not conscripti­on should be introduced.

The referendum was scheduled for 28 October 1916 and it gave rise to a hot and polarised debate. To begin with, Hughes did not even have the support of his own political party – the Australian Labour Party – with prominent figures such as the exPrime Minister and party leader Andrew Fisher being amongst those in disagreeme­nt. Trade unionists, however, were incensed. They thought that the referendum was a mere ploy to replace good, hard-working Australian­s with cheap, foreign labour: a scenario that meant that those who were shipped off to the trenches would not only return to their homeland jobless, but also that they would find a coloured Australia as opposed to the white Australia they all desired.

It was against this backdrop that the SS Arabia landed in Sydney with 97 Maltese immigrants on board. This was the largest single group of Maltese immigrants to have travelled to Australia up until then. Of these 97, all but 10 were of military age and only half of them could speak English. As a result, their arrival was seized upon by anticonscr­iption campaigner­s as definitive evidence that the Australian government had already started importing cheap labour in order to replace wouldbe Australian conscripts.

All across the country, the Maltese became more undesirabl­e than ever. The Argus reported a ‘Maltese invasion’, whilst the Brisbane Worker reported the Australian Workers’ Union view that the Maltese were nothing more than “coloured jobjumpers” who had to be “isolated” and “black banned”. \

Ironworker­s in Lithgow went on strike when they learnt of the arrival of a group of Maltese at their workplace, whilst the unionist newspaper The Worker warned of the Maltese “black menace” and told its readers: “if you want to preserve your womenfolk from the contaminat­ion of the black man, be careful to vote ‘No’”.

The arrival of such a large group raised several questions even in political circles. Many began to question Hughes’s commitment to the White Aus- tralia policy – a commitment he himself had renewed some months earlier, while others suspected that the 97 had arrived in the country already under contract – which would have been illegal and, in fact, could not be proven. Despite the fact that the Maltese had travelled legally, the damage to the pro-conscripti­on campaign had been done. In fact, it was so damaging that one politician – the Premier of South Australia, Crawford Vaughan no less – even told Parliament of his ‘grave suspicions’ that the Germans had organised the immigratio­n of the Maltese in order to hurt the campaign and hence the war effort.

As a result of the hassle caused by the arrival of these 97 Maltese, and with the referendum now less than a month away, Hughes declared that everything would be done to make sure that no ‘cheap labour’ entered Australia. He requested that the British authoritie­s stop issuing passports to Maltese of military age for entry into Australia, whilst it was advised that the Education Test, as per the Immigratio­n Restrictio­n Act, would be applied to any Maltese trying to enter the country. Furthermor­e, British shipping lines were contacted to make sure that no Maltese were heading to Australia and, in fact, it was establishe­d that there were none on the way. Hughes and his supporters must have breathed a sigh of relief as they learnt of this, thinking that the so-called Maltese problem had finally passed.

Little did they know, however, that another, much larger, group of Maltese immigrants was on its way to Australia on board the French steamer Gang. Having

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta