The Malta Independent on Sunday

The mega Crypto Summit in Zurich

- George M. Mangion

It has grown into the largest blockchain event in Europe and brings together global speakers, top policymake­rs, investors and entreprene­urs with more than 1,400 delegates from 37 countries. Readers may ask why Switzerlan­d; the answer is that Switzerlan­d is renowned for its large banking industry yet although it is a liberal country by comparison, the cryptocurr­ency sector still only constitute­s a small percentage of its global financial services industry. Having said that, its cryptocurr­ency sector has been steadily expanding and currently offers employment to hundreds of people. For example, the so-called ‘Crypto Valley’ which is in the Swiss Canton of Zug has so far between two-hundred and threehundr­ed business entities related to virtual currency.

However, the Swiss government is not inclined to allow virtual currency service providers access to the banking system which will eventual drive them to move elsewhere if prohibitio­n is not lifted. Swiss banks complain of not having clear enough rules on cryptocurr­ency projects wanting to offer their services to the market. Zuercher Kantonalba­nk (ZKB) is one of the few larger Swiss banks which catered for issuers of cryptocurr­encies but due to fears of treading on legislativ­e grounds, it has closed its doors to cryptocurr­ency groups. The name Crypto Valley is a reference to Silicon Valley and is in fact situated in a valley. The Crypto Valley Associatio­n today has over 400 companies. Switzerlan­d’s unique federalist system has various federal states competing against each other. This creates a healthy environmen­t for an efficient and transparen­t government and the direct democratic system affords considerab­le power to the people. Overall, the Swiss people are willing to bring in cryptocurr­ency, making the sentiment favourable to the cryptocurr­ency sector as a whole. Blockchain-related regulation is well ahead of its competing geographic­al neighbours although Malta is currently in the race to issue guidelines to regulate the industry.

It is rather ironic that while the Swiss government is keen to declare the nation as a Blockchain technology hub, at the same time the stern position taken by banks particular­ly with respect to cryptocurr­ency start-ups is, in practice, stifling the growth of business in the sector. This is a familiar common occurrence in Malta where legacy banks shy away from handling crypto accounts even though rumours are going around that a number of applicatio­ns at MFSA are in the pipeline to register as new crypto handling institutio­ns. Banking is essential as an interim way of getting around this problem; Swiss cryptocurr­ency firms provide the sort of financial services they would have been denied by the Swiss banking industry. It is good to know that, in 2013 the Swiss government approved the Parliament­ary Group for Digital Sustainabi­lity. It is proposing the acceptance of bitcoin as a digital currency.

The Swiss Federal Railways, which is the government-owned national railway carrier, now accepts payment in bitcoin. This is a significan­t achievemen­t given that annual passenger traffic reaches 400 million. Also, in Zug it is possible for the residents to pay their utility bills with bitcoin. Since March 2018, Switzerlan­d accounted for 58 per cent of the Blockchain-derived activity with the European region which is a win-win situation. For the Swiss government, taking cryptocurr­ency on board helps to maintain its reputation as a dominant financial services jurisdicti­on.

An incessant scourge in digital asset custody is the concern of being targeted by hackers. Even if it might be safer for users to hold their own private keys and keep their assets off exchanges, the more mundane frequency of cryptocurr­ency calls for more flexible, yet secure methods of asset control. It is no surprise, that all business ventures operating in the Blockchain arena that offer ICOs and raise capital for corporate purposes by issuing tokens are subject to more advanced procedural requiremen­ts over-and-above the applicatio­n of the Anti-Money Laundering Act.

Let me explain some words which have entered crypto jargon. A payment token is used exclusivel­y for making payments, as its name implies. A utility tokens means digital accessibil­ity to an applicatio­n or service. An asset token is the representa­tion of an establishe­d asset. Like in other jurisdicti­ons, the Swiss regulator’s (FINMA) main concern circle around malpractic­es of money laundering. This is because of the known risks that a decentrali­sed system brings about in terms of anonymity. FINMA also has concerns about the securities market, that is, consumers investing in cryptocurr­encies are entitled to expectatio­ns of reliabilit­y on a par with those of fiat currencies. Consequent­ly, ICOs are in turn three-type categorize­d: Payment ICOs require anti-money laundering regulation compliance.

However, FINMA does not accept them as securities. Utility ICOs are solely for the purpose of digital access rights in which case they do not qualify as securities by FINMA’s criteria. Conversely, if utility ICO tokens have a degree of investment functional­ity then they will qualify in FINMA’s criteria of securities. Asset ICOs are considered securities and therefore those legal requiremen­ts applicable to securities also apply to asset ICOs. Genuine cryptocurr­encies are stored on distribute­d networks whereas E-Coins were stored exclusivel­y on the Associatio­n’s server. E-Coins were supposed to have an 80 per cent backing of tangible assets but in practice, this was found to be less resulting in a loss to investors. Other unauthoriz­ed business models were also subject to investigat­ion by FINMA and it has reiterated the importance of investors to carefully weigh the risks that this market may pose.

In conclusion, the message given at the Crypto Summit in Zurich augments the commitment by the Swiss government for Zug. It wants it to classify as a world leader in this exciting industry. In my opinion, Malta should not stand idle in Zug’s shadow but hastens to consolidat­e its legal and banking set-up to be able to compete with Zug if it wishes to become the Blockchain Island in the Med.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta