The Sunday Times of Malta

Labour’s newest apologist

- KEVIN CASSAR

The new standards commission­er reached his conclusion. Transport Minister Aaron Farrugia is careless, a bad planner and indecisive – but he didn’t breach the code of ethics. The newly appointed commission­er, former Labour Party candidate Joseph Azzopardi, confirmed what everybody else thinks about Farrugia.

In his mad rush to please Robert Abela, Azzopardi decided he shouldn’t investigat­e Farrugia. Farrugia was due to appear in parliament to answer questions. He didn’t turn up. The country had just seen a horrific video in which Transport Malta employees ruthlessly beat a motorist lying helpless on the ground. Farrugia was the minister. He knew he’d face burning questions about the case. Farrugia was in parliament but decided not to enter the chamber, evading questions.

Those questions were our questions. When parliament­ary representa­tives ask ministers questions, they pose them on our behalf. We have a right to answers. Ministers have a duty to answer expeditiou­sly, truthfully and completely. That’s the basis of democracy ‒ transparen­cy and accountabi­lity.

Farrugia’s contemptib­le willful absence from the chamber was a slap in the face of democracy. He not only failed to answer questions, he didn’t even have the courage to turn up. To rub salt into the wound, Farrugia was in parliament minutes earlier. Yet, he simply didn’t bother entering the chamber.

The ministeria­l code is absolutely clear. Ministers must attend parliament and answer questions. They’re only excused in specific situations ‒ if they’re abroad or if they’re ill. Farrugia was neither.

Parliament­ary Standing Order 158 also excuses ministers if they are on government business and their absence has the speaker’s explicit approval. In Farrugia’s case, the speaker wasn’t even aware Farrugia would be absent.

Farrugia broke both the ministeria­l code and Parliament­ary Standing Order 158. He showed contempt and disdain towards the public he is meant to serve. He was reported to the new standards commission­er.

The commission­er was given an easy case. Clear-cut. It should have been an elementary straightfo­rward investigat­ion. And an even more straightfo­rward ruling.

But that’s assuming the commission­er is there to uphold the highest standards in public life. That’s not what Azzopardi was appointed for. The prime minister walked through fire to appoint Azzopardi as standards commission­er with the explicit task of covering up Labour MPs’ wrongdoing.

That is exactly what Azzopardi did. And what’s the best way of covering up for Farrugia? No investigat­ion. Faced with incontrove­rtible evidence of Farrugia’s ethics breaches, Azzopardi decided not to investigat­e him at all.

The big advantage of not investigat­ing is that everything gets buried. And the biggest advantage of all is that not even the commission­er’s letter replying to the complainan­t gets published. Everything is secret.

The commission­er, who is meant to uphold the highest ethical standards of transparen­cy, honesty and integrity, conspired with Labour to hide everything from the public. The only reason we know anything about Farrugia’s case is because Repubblika published that document. If it weren’t for Repubblika nobody would have known. “This document will not be published by my office,” the commission­er triumphant­ly concluded.

Azzopardi is truly living up to the role Abela assigned him ‒ gravedigge­r-in-chief. His principal role is to bury Labour’s guilt.

Azzopardi’s letter to Repubblika is shocking. Azzopardi tied himself in knots trying to find excuses for Farrugia. He presented completely flawed reasons why he shouldn’t investigat­e.

First, he claimed his predecesso­r had concluded that ministers who fail to answer parliament­ary questions shouldn’t be investigat­ed. But Farrugia was reported not because he failed to answer questions but because he just didn’t turn up without the speaker’s approval.

Then, he referred to another George Hyzler decision not to investigat­e an MP who didn’t attend parliament but who had the speaker’s approval for his absence. That didn’t apply to Farrugia either.

Azzopardi found other for not investigat­ing.

In an e-mail to the speaker, Farrugia claimed he failed to attend “because of other commitment­s”.

“At 4.20pm I was due to take part in an important meeting,” he stated. What was that important meeting that was more important than answering the people’s questions in parliament? We don’t know. Neither does the commission­er.

It might have been a meeting for his canvassers ‒ that would surely be considered important by Farrugia. The least the commission­er could have done was enquire as to what sort of meeting it was. He didn’t bother, for one simple reason. He’s not interested in maintainin­g standards. His role is covering up for Labour.

Farrugia was all over the place. He desperatel­y tried to justify how he could possibly have been in parliament but not walk into the chamber. “I managed to arrive at Valletta before the time of the meeting and for me it was natural to attend parliament, where I arrived soon after 4pm. Outside parliament … . I felt I had to stop and answer a journalist. I even stopped to speak to colleagues. Then I realised excuses time was pressing to attend to my commitment due at 4.20pm. It was precisely because of this that I failed to enter the chamber.

“I informed the whip that it was going to be difficult for me to arrive on time,” Farrugia claimed. But the whip didn’t inform the speaker. The speaker didn’t give his approval for Farrugia’s absence. But that didn’t matter for Azzopardi. Sweating profusely, he finally had his excuse to exculpate Farrugia.

Farrugia didn’t break any ethics, Azzopardi announced, because he informed the whip. So, no investigat­ion required. And my office won’t publish this. Thankfully Repubblika did.

In his panic to exonerate Farrugia, Azzopardi destroyed Farrugia. This was “bad planning by the minister”, “he should have scheduled his commitment­s with more care”, “the indecision of the minister”. This wasn’t bad planning. It was sheer disrespect and disdain for the public. It is the arrogance of one who feels above scrutiny and accountabi­lity.

Abela has demolished one of the last remaining safeguards against his anti-democratic authoritar­ianism.

Azzopardi’s carte blanche incentivis­es Labour’s bad behaviour and contempt for the public. He is Labour’s newest apologist.

“Standards Commission­er Joseph Azzopardi’s carte blanche incentivis­es Labour’s bad behaviour and contempt for the public

Kevin Cassar surgery.

is a professor

of

 ?? ?? Standards Commission­er Joseph Azzopardi, left, decided not to investigat­e Transport Minister Aaron Farrugia for not turning up in parliament to answer questions. PHOTOS: MATTHEW MIRABELLI
Standards Commission­er Joseph Azzopardi, left, decided not to investigat­e Transport Minister Aaron Farrugia for not turning up in parliament to answer questions. PHOTOS: MATTHEW MIRABELLI
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta