Times of Malta

Judge throws out request for police to probe melvin theuma for perjury

- EDWINA BRINCAT

It would not be wise for the police to investigat­e self-confessed middleman Melvin Theuma for perjury once the evidence in the Daphne Caruana Galizia murder case is not yet conclusive, even if certain inconsiste­ncies are “rather suspicious”, a judge declared.

In a judgment handed down by the Criminal Court yesterday, Madam Justice Audrey Demicoli turned down the appeal filed by Yorgen Fenech in proceeding­s wherein he was challengin­g the police commission­er to investigat­e Theuma for perjury and taking a false oath in the murder case.

Last year, the Magistrate­s’ Court had rejected the businessma­n’s bid to force the police into investigat­ing Theuma over the allegedly false statements he gave throughout the proceeding­s where Fenech stands accused of being an accomplice.

That court had concluded that, at this stage, there was no prima facie basis for the police commission­er to order such an investigat­ion.

Theuma, who has been granted a presidenti­al pardon in exchange for his testimony about the journalist’s 2017 murder, is the prosecutio­n’s star witness in the case against Fenech.

The former taxi driver has given evidence in court against Fenech as well as others allegedly involved in the assassinat­ion plot.

However, Fenech’s lawyers say Theuma’s testimony is full of “half-truths” and “blatant lies”.

They claimed that Theuma had given false testimony both before the magistrate conducting the in genere inquiry as well as during the compilatio­n of evidence.

They called upon the court to direct the police commission­er to investigat­e and prosecute Theuma for taking a false oath and perjury.

Theuma’s lawyers had immediatel­y reacted by filing parallel challenge proceeding­s calling upon the police authoritie­s to prosecute Fenech for such calumnious accusation­s in his regard.

In their appeal, Fenech’s lawyers argued that the first court had ignored their

allegation­s regarding Theuma’s false oath, basing its decision only on the other allegation­s concerning perjury.

The police failed to investigat­e Theuma because they relied on the attorney general’s advice to wait for the murder proceeding­s to be wrapped up since Theuma could always retract his statement when testifying, even under crossexami­nation.

However, Fenech’s lawyers argued that such retraction was not possible since the offence of taking a false oath was committed the very minute Theuma said something false before the inquiring magistrate.

So the police had the duty to investigat­e.

What Theuma said in the magisteria­l inquiry contradict­ed his subsequent testimony in court.

And what he said on oath “manifestly contrasted” with his statements in his own secretly recorded conversati­ons, argued Fenech’s lawyers, highlighti­ng Theuma’s inconsiste­ncies and stressing that the prosecutio­n’s star witness was not telling the whole truth about his knowledge on the murder.

The police commission­er rebutted that Theuma could still retract whatever he said in the murder compilatio­n and/or correct himself if he previously told a lie.

When delivering judgment, Madam Justice Demicoli said that the court understood the police commission­er’s “hesitation” in prosecutin­g Theuma at a stage when the murder case was still ongoing.

Judging by the extracts of testimonie­s cited by Fenech’s lawyers in their challenge applicatio­n and other evidence put forward, “it was rather suspicious” that Theuma’s sworn testimony at the magisteria­l inquiry contrasted with evidence produced at the compilatio­n of evidence.

‘What theuma said in inquiry ContradiCt­ed his Court testimony’

Evidence produced ‘in isolation’ and outside context

And “it is true that there is a possibilit­y that Melvin Theuma took a false oath before the inquiring magistrate”, went on the judge.

However, it would not be wise for the police to prosecute Theuma based on evidence that is not yet conclusive and evidence produced “in isolation” and outside the context of all the other evidence in the murder case.

Therefore, the police commission­er was justified in not pressing criminal charges against Theuma at this stage, concluded the judge, turning down Fenech’s appeal.

Lawyers Gianluca Caruana Curran, Charles Mercieca and Marion Camilleri are assisting Fenech.

 ?? ?? Melvin Theuma, left, and Yorgen Fenech.
Melvin Theuma, left, and Yorgen Fenech.
 ?? FILE PHOTOS: TIMES OF MALTA ??
FILE PHOTOS: TIMES OF MALTA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta