The UB Post

The threat of capital flight

- By B.CHINTUSHIG

Centerra Gold’s recent sale of its Mongolian business unit for 35 million USD has brought forward concerns that foreign investors and companies are losing confidence in the country’s stability and economy. The worry is that eroding trust in Mongolia’s political and judicial system in addition to increasing resource nationalis­m will cause capital flight on a scale that has not been seen since 2016. But the question is, is this concern warranted?

Capital flight is a large-scale exit of financial assets and capital from a nation due to events such as political or economic instabilit­y, currency devaluatio­n or the imposition of capital controls. In the case of capital flight of 2016, plummeting commodity prices and depreciati­on of the tugrug was one of the biggest culprits. Unstable political and judicial system definitely did not help matters but it is not seen as the biggest factor.

Even in the most unstable countries, multinatio­nal mining corporatio­ns continue to operate as the reward outweighs the risks. Past experience shows us that some multinatio­nal mining companies thrive in unstable regions through using kickbacks and briberies to leverage their way into disadvanta­geous agreements.

In Centerra Gold’s case, the company was ostracized by the public and the local media. Popular movements aimed at preserving Mount Noyon situated nearby the Gatsuurt gold project essentiall­y made it impossible for the company to begin production. At the recommenda­tion of the Canadian government, the Toronto-based miner tried to engage more with the local communitie­s, rather unsuccessf­ully. What followed was years of legal proceeding­s and countless attempts to negotiate with the government. All of this culminated in the company selling its entire Mongolian business unit in what it described as an effort to improve the quality of its asset portfolio.

This essentiall­y signified that the company admitted that the risks and burden of the project outweighed the reward. The Gatsuurt project was a specific case that eventually ended in the company exiting Mongolia. Now that Centerra Gold has officially left Mongolia, our efforts are better served to not overanalyz­e this one case but to look at the bigger picture. The bigger picture question is, can this happen again? The Centerra Gold controvers­y will be consequent­ial for years to come. It has set both a bad and partially good precedent, depending on your views on the merits of the arguments that both sides made.

The partially good precedent is that if the mine was indeed causing harm to the environmen­t and local population, it is good that NGOs and local communitie­s can mobilize to prevent such damaging practices.

However, on the other hand, it creates a dangerous precedent that interest groups could use to sabotage legitimate mining projects. If the allegation­s against the mine’s effects on the local population and environmen­t have been exaggerate­d or fabricated in order to advance an agenda, it can prove to be quite harmful. This type of resource nationalis­m is a major factor in actively discouragi­ng future investment and encouragin­g capital flight.

In the case of Gatsuurt, the protest of NGOs and the local community has only resulted in one foreign company being swapped with another foreign company. The movement against the Gatsuurt project would have been better suited to demand better safety standards and environmen­tal protection rather than demanding the revocation of the Gatsuurt mining license. Mongolia is a commodity dependent country and gold is especially a valuable resource that the central bank has been actively seeking to increase production of. It was never realistic to permanentl­y shut down any mining operation efforts at the project.

In all honesty, in the short to mid-term Mongolia will likely not experience large capital flight due to the certain security and stability that comes with an IMF program and the fact that commodity prices are relatively high. But as we have seen, all of that is temporary. The IMF program will end in 2020 and commodity prices will drop. This is inevitable. What is not inevitable is the flight of capital. Even in times when commodity prices are low, good transparen­t governance, stable macroecono­my, and fair judicial system can nudge a foreign company to ride out the bust cycle. The fact that Mongolia has a fairly unstable political environmen­t and notoriousl­y unstable judicial system essentiall­y acts as an incentive for foreign companies to cut their losses and leave in times when commodity prices are not so favorable.

Mining giants like Rio Tinto are here to stay because they have invested too much time, effort, and money into Mongolia to exit at the first sight of trouble. But we cannot bank on that fact alone in encouragin­g foreign invested mining companies to stay. The reality is there is not enough capital in Mongolia to sustainabl­y finance any large-scale mining project. There is a reason why the government is about to offer around 30 percent of Erdenes Tavan Tolgoi on the internatio­nal stock market. Seeing as we can’t finance any major projects on our own, kicking out mining companies or making it so hard that they have no choice but to leave is basically shooting ourselves in the foot.

But this does not mean we should or can tolerate everything a mining company does. As with any business, a mining company is a for-profit entity. As such, they will look to cut costs wherever possible to maximize its profit. Unfortunat­ely, in the case of mining, this usually means less money expended for rehabilita­tion and promoting developmen­t of the local communitie­s. Therefore, ensuring responsibl­e and sustainabl­e mining that is not harmful to the local population or the environmen­t through laws and regulation is the critical balance we must find on this issue.

...As with any business, a mining company is a for-profit entity. As such, they will look to cut costs wherever possible to maximize its profit. Unfortunat­ely, in the case of mining, this usually means less money expended for rehabilita­tion and promoting developmen­t of the local communitie­s...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Mongolia