The UB Post

Enterprise­s suggest eliminatin­g overlappin­g state inspection­s

-

A discussion on the bill on public-private partnershi­ps took place on October 24.

The bill was developed with nine chapters and 60 articles to create a favorable legal environmen­t for long-term and effective cooperatio­n by supporting the private sector’s participat­ion and investment in publicpriv­ate partnershi­p projects in the field of public infrastruc­ture and public services.

Parliament approved the State Policy on Public-Private Partnershi­ps in 2009 and the Law on Concession­s in 2010. However, the concession law does not fully address the basic principles and concepts of public-private partnershi­ps, such as partnershi­p planning, selection and risk assessment, the bill initiators explained.

The participan­ts expressed that excessive privileges and power granted to government agencies make it impossible for the private sector to implement projects with their own investment, and highlighte­d the need to reduce the number of overlappin­g state inspection­s.

Enterprise­s noted that they initiate many infrastruc­ture projects but the implementa­tion of projects requires support from government organizati­ons other than financial assistance and grants.

The bill initiators mentioned that if the bill on public-private partnershi­ps is passed, it will create many advantages that lessen the burden on the state budget when implementi­ng large projects.

In accordance with the bill, a ministry or agency responsibl­e for public-private partnershi­ps and a Public-Private Partnershi­p Center will be establishe­d. It stipulates that the center will cooperate closely with the Ministry of Finance.

During the discussion, Parliament­arian S.Ganbaatar commented, “The private sector is the main pillar that creates jobs, improves the economy and advances the country forward. People doing honest business cannot participat­e in mega projects of the government.”

Director of Policy and Advocacy at the American Chamber of Commerce in Mongolia G.Javkhlantu­gs underscore­d that the government is responsibl­e for defining policies aimed to protect the private sector from unfair competitio­n. “The economy will recover by supporting the private sector. This bill should be thoroughly checked whether there are provisions on reliabilit­y, innovation and informatio­n security. This is because government organizati­ons often use business ideas themselves in the name of project selection. The government does not need to have a partnershi­p with the private sector but it has to support the private sector to run their activities smoothly. State-owned companies are involved in major projects. There is no need to create difficulti­es by conducting a selection process for projects of the private sector, giving evaluation­s by the government and approval by Parliament. The proposal of the private sector should be clearly reflected in the bill,” he said.

G.Javkhlantu­gs also stated, “Transparen­cy is paramount to the implementa­tion of this law. The decisionma­king process needs to be concise and clear. The bill initiators should make it clear whether or not the private sector can vote on the projects selected by the government. In general, state interventi­ons should be minimized as much as possible and issues of conflict of interest and transparen­cy should be regulated by law. It is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the e-nation is meant to reduce government bureaucrac­y, but it is increasing it instead.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Mongolia