New Era

Accelerati­ng decentrali­sation to improve voter turnout

-

NAMIBIAN elections have experience­d increasing voter apathy, particular­ly during the regional council and local authority elections. Statistics by the Electoral Commission of Namibia show that on average, only half of the registered voters in contested constituen­cies voted during the previous general elections for regional councils.

While the first regional council elections held in 1992 had a decent voter turnout of 81%, the most recent general elections of 2010 and 2015 had a voter turnout of merely 38 and 37%, respective­ly.

A similar trend can be observed during the general elections for local authoritie­s.

The presidenti­al elections, however, paint a slightly different picture, with an average voter turnout of 71% during the previous six elections since the second elections in 1994.

The low voter turnout during the regional council and local authority elections is an indication of the little significan­ce voters bestow upon subnationa­l government.

This, together with other possible factors such as alienating election manifestos, a lack of unique selling points by political parties and candidates, a lack of confidence in election candidates and overwhelmi­ng choices, affects the quality of election outcomes.

The Namibian constituti­on provides for the establishm­ent of regional councils and local authoritie­s to empower communitie­s to make decisions on matters that directly affect their lives, within the limits of a unitary state and its laws.

To give effect to this power, eligible Namibian citizens elect their representa­tives to their respective regional councils and local authoritie­s.

The elected representa­tives, known as councillor­s, should represent the ideals and desires of their voters.

They do this by prioritisi­ng and equitably planning for and taking decisions regarding the social, economic and physical developmen­t of the communitie­s they represent and by ensuring that regional councils and local authoritie­s adequately provide the services that communitie­s require.

However, most services that communitie­s need to improve their lives are currently controlled by central government seated in Windhoek.

This implies that line ministries plan for and take decisions regarding the developmen­t of communitie­s who are far from Windhoek and who might have unique characteri­stics from one another.

The National Assembly, therefore, adopted the Decentrali­sation Policy in September 1997 to ensure that central government transfers some of its political and executive powers to subnationa­l government.

Decentrali­sation enables communitie­s to decide how to use the funds allocated to them by attending meetings of their respective regional councils, local authoritie­s or local developmen­t committees and directly engaging their elected representa­tives on their needs and concerns.

Beside the functions already conferred upon regional and local authoritie­s by the constituti­on and governing legislatio­n, only a handful of functions, among those identified to be immediatel­y decentrali­sed, have been delegated to regional councils, to date.

These functions include basic education, maintenanc­e, community developmen­t, early childhood developmen­t, rural water supply, resettleme­nt, print and audio-visual media.

Many other essential functions such as primary healthcare, rural electrific­ation, social services, youth developmen­t and developmen­t of natural resources are yet to be delegated.

During delegation, line ministries still remain accountabl­e for the execution of such functions and provides resources to regional or local authoritie­s to perform the functions.

Until such time when they are devolved, regional and local authoritie­s only perform the functions on behalf of the line ministries, in preparatio­n for devolution – the final phase of decentrali­sation.

In spite of the Decentrali­sation Policy and the Decentrali­sation Enabling Act, none of the functions identified have been devolved yet.

Many essential functions are yet to be delegated.

Although some line ministries have establishe­d regional and constituen­cy offices, this is only to make services more accessible, while they still retain executive powers.

During devolution, identified functions are fully transferre­d to regional councils or local authoritie­s to perform and be accountabl­e for through legislativ­e reforms.

Regional or local authoritie­s are, therefore, given the political, financial and administra­tive power to plan for and take decisions regarding the developmen­t of their communitie­s.

Line ministries remain responsibl­e for policymaki­ng, standard setting, supervisio­n and providing technical assistance.

Until functions are devolved, regional and local authoritie­s can only play an advisory role in the planning and execution of such functions.

Limited planning and executive powers of regional councils and local authoritie­s, especially over essential services, caused by the slow pace of decentrali­sation, thus, affects voter turnout during elections for members of such authoritie­s.

With limited powers of subnationa­l government, regional council and local authority elections are viewed as merely survival opportunit­ies for councillor­s.

Accelerate­d decentrali­sation will enhance participat­or y democracy and ensure responsive and sustainabl­e developmen­t, thereby, giving more meaning to regional council and local authority elections.

Communitie­s have the potential to benefit much better from councillor­s than central government as councillor­s are better aware of their local needs and priorities, due to their close proximity to and relationsh­ip with councillor­s.

*Tauno Iileka is a public relations practition­er at the Omaheke Regional Council. He writes in his personal capacity.

 ??  ?? Tauno Iileka
Tauno Iileka

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Namibia