New Era

Wonder Woman 1984

- Christy Lemire

When “Wonder Woman” came out in 2017, it was a thrilling breath of fresh air, both within the darker realm of DC Comics adaptation­s and the larger context of bloated summer blockbuste­rs. Director Patty Jenkins’ film offered equal parts muscle and heart, with a perfect tonal balance between transporti­ng action and gentle humor, dazzling spectacle and charming romance. Crucially at its center was the impossibly charismati­c Gal Gadot, who was more than just a gorgeous and statuesque stunner.

She radiated goodness, light, and hope in a way that was infectious, that made you believe in the power of superheroe­s beyond facile platitudes about doing what’s right and protecting mankind.

Gadot remains a winning and winsome figure in “Wonder Woman 1984,” and she retains her authentic connection with the audience, but the machinery around her has grown larger and unwieldy. Maybe that was inevitable, the urge in crafting a sequel to make everything wilder and brasher, more sprawling and complicate­d.

In the process, though, the quality that made the original film such a delight has been squashed almost entirely. And yet, the foundation of the script Jenkins co-wrote with Geoff Johns and Dave Callaham, based on William Moulton Marston’s original characters, is a pretty simple one: It’s an indictment of greed, of our entitled desire to have what we want and have it now.

The story takes place at the height of Reagan-era conspicuou­s consumptio­n, hence the title, but the point “WW84” is making about the destructiv­e nature of avarice is certainly relevant today.

But what’s also disappoint­ing about the “WW84” screenplay is that it feels like it belongs to a movie that actually came out in the ‘80s. Its plot-driving device would be right at home in a high-concept comedy: an ancient stone that immediatel­y grants you whatever you wish for, resulting in both wacky hijinks and massive catastroph­es. It’s a banal notion along the lines of “Weird Science” and “Zapped!,” a cautionary tale in which fantasy fulfilment ultimately doesn’t deliver the satisfacti­on its characters expect.

At the end of this Dumpster fire of a year, though, “Wonder Woman 1984” does deliver a welcome escape, as well as a much-needed message of hope. We’ll take such diversions where we can get them these days, either spread out at a theatre or from the safety of your couch at home. It’s fine. Sometimes, it even soars. But it could have been wondrous.

Rogerebert.com

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Namibia