Indian hatred deepening in South Asia

Kathmandu: Bijaya Chouthaiwala, BJP leader, came, saw, and accomplished his "mission" of twisting the arms of India elevated present-day Nepali leaders who have made the country India's pet colony. Or else why he should have been deployed by Narendra Modi -- you understand him better.

The Indian pimp in

Nepal:

The noted Indian who claims himself to be a "scientist" returned home only when he assured himself or was consoled that those Nepali "servants" whom he met during his four/five days' sojourn in Kathmandu will unhesitatingly "serve" the Indian Union and its prime security interests.

However, the Nepali servants were perhaps assured that they will pocket financial gains for assisting India with an open heart. Anti-nationals are paid thus.

Hopefully, the Indian could collect some more "paid recruits" in Nepal who may have told him that they were "made for India".

It was a matter of absolute shame that none of the Nepali political animals questioned the visiting Indian leader to what of Nepali territories that have been encroached upon by his Indian union and also what of the crime that the armed Indian police who caused the tragic death of a Nepali national Jay Singh Dhami who while crossing the Mahakali River was swept by the mighty and the swelling river. Curse be upon the Indian policeman who killed the innocent Nepali national.

The Nepali political animals or say State parasites, looters albeit, are afraid of the Indian muggers in pushing their issues as and when these brutes land in Kathmandu and that too uninvited more often than not.

The Indian leader instead of listening to Nepali grievances, impose their own "concerns" and press the Nepali submissive RAW's posted agents to work day in day out for the betterment of the former Slave Regime -- India. This is presumed in Kathmandu. Chouthaiwala who freshly came to Kathmandu to discipline the already Indiansed Nepali leaders met the entire set of those who prefer to ditch their own motherland in lieu of the good of the former slave Regime - India.

Highly placed sources say that the Indiansed Nepali leaders for getting elevated in political ranks in Nepali politics prefer to serve the Indian regime - India unmistakably and the practice goes on and on. The most glaring example of this is Madhav Kumar Nepal. Nepal who got defeated in two different constituencies in the parliamentary elections was made the country's prime minister which was only possible through the naked political manoeuvring of the Indian establishment. Understandably, the one who got elevated to the rank of prime minister in Nepal felt obliged to serve the "Mera Bharat Mahan" as a matter of "devotion, dedication and obligation". Upon the return of Chouthaiwala from Kathmandu, Nepal's new political party got certification from Nepal's Election Commission. The timing is loaded with meaning underneath.

Nepal now has the distinction of "breaking" the United Marxists-Leninists party (UML) which India had wished for.

To put it straight, the adversary regime wants each and every political party in Nepal to remain in a politically rickety state so that "political benefits" could be extracted in India's favour.

The idea is to bring about a rupture first in a particular party and then jump into the "internal politics" of the same in the name of "arbitration" and then settle the differences in such a way that the party-men remains subservient to the Indian union. The Delhi designed 12-point agreement is a classic example.

Questions Dr Bhim Rawal, a UML (United Marxists Leninists) functionary as to which of the Nepali politicians from which political party that had gone to wash the ugly and dirty feet of Chouthaiwala, asked about how the Indian government will compensate the life of Dhami who was swept by the River in the Western region because of the unpardonable follies of the Indian border security force. Perhaps none asked this question to the Indian leader visiting Nepal. In effect, the Indians treat Nepali leaders as their pet servants since the beginning of 2006, after the ouster of the Nepali monarchy which was ousted by a great grand design and funding of the Indian spy agency RAW.

It is believed, RAW machinery's Nepali agents are nearing eighty thousand in numbers. Most of the so-called "big media houses" and the vibrant media men unfailingly draw their monthly perks from Lainchour. It is these corrupt anti-nationals who sell their "mother Nepal" in lieu of a few financial gains. It is this set of "sold" media men who will expectedly not hesitate to send their own mothers to be "raped" in RAW brothels by the Indian criminals as against some financial gains.

In fact, the way Nepal has been submitted to the Indian whims after 2006, speaks of the great grand design of the Nepali leaders with excessive India bend in making Nepal another Sikkim, an independent and sovereign nation close to Nepal, which was under coercion and excessive military force gulped by the Indian Union in the mid-seventies. The Sikkim population today stand bereft of independence and sovereignty.

So wrote Dr Peshal Pokhrel, a Professor of History, that half of the Nepali parliamentarians possess dual citizenship certificates and possess the right to vote at the time of the election both in India and Nepal. According to him, a born

Indian national like Sarita Giri, for example, shall ever remain committed and honest to the birth country, India, which is only but natural.

Similarly, Rajendra Mahato, a leader of the Tarai based political party, is an Indian national who has been in the Nepali cabinet for three decades and yet the Nepal government finds it unable to dismiss his Nepali citizenship certificate with the fear of being penalized by the Indian ruling elites who have given a shape to the government in Nepal. Mahato thus controls the entire Nepal.

At least this has been the practice, since India designed political stir in 2006 stabilized in India's favour. In a way, it was this India instigated and funded upheaval that "institutionalized" the Indian supremacy in Nepal for perhaps all time to come. Deposed King Gyanendra and his "India controlled" supporters are just making fun of the King assuring him that India's Modi will restore the monarchy in Nepal.

However, what is sure is that India shall never ever restore the Nepali monarchy and if perchance the monarchy is restored by the Indian regime then on what conditions the monarchy shall be restored? What price the Nepali nation will have to pay for the contribution rendered by India for the monarchy restoration? Bluntly speaking, any price-tagged restoration is just unacceptable for Nepal and its India controlled population. Sure, the Nepali population would love to hate the restoration of the Nepali monarchy with the help of India. India, we the people know, is the nearest enemy of Nepal.

It is not only Nepal that has been robbed and coerced by the former British slave, India, but the country, Bangladesh which was created to penalize Pakistan too has similar stories about the Indian highhandedness in its political affairs and economic plunder.

Zainal Abedin, a Bangladeshi scholar of international repute was heard telling his participants in an Islamabad sponsored Webinar, 2020, that the Indian spy agency RAW was creating terror in his country, Bangladesh. As per scholar Abedin, the entire politics of Bangladesh is being controlled by the Indian RAW agency and thus he urged the attending participants to form a coalition of some Muslim countries in South Asia, excluding India, to fight the RAW hazard.

If Zainal was to be believed, then the Modi variant of the RAW has completely taken up the charge of Bangladesh which needs to be arrested by the denizens of the country itself or else the country's situation will be much similar to how Nepal is at the moment. If Chouthaiwala, the Modi variant of the Bharatiya Janata Party, comes to Kathmandu, then some of Modi's Delta and Lambada variants may have been visiting the country which had the distinction of being created by India in the early seventies.

The Indian High Commissioner in Dhaka houses the hordes of the

RAW men who have spread their tentacles in the entire country, supposedly the satellite of India to which the Dhakaites have strong distaste.

The Bangladesh distaste for India:

Look how the Bangladeshi citizens with academic backgrounds take the neighbouring Indian regime.

"It is India who should forever be grateful to Bangladesh. India often claims and wishes that Bangladesh should be grateful to India mentioning its role during 1971 as if a favour was done to Bangladeshis. But, the fact is India supported the independence war of B'desh only because it wanted to break Pakistan, to weaken Pakistan. India never considers B'desh as a friend. India still believes the people of B'desh find themselves in natural proximity with Pakistan as the majority of both countries follows the same religion", twitted a Bangladeshi academician. She adds further saying how India robs the country in billions and billions in dollars.

She says, "As of November 2019, a report says the total remittance inflow into India has reached $16.67 billion which was about $10.00 billion in 2017. Another point is that those Indians have been working in high profile jobs in different establishments such as NGOs, garments, textiles, IT and send money back home through "Hundi" transfer systems as they don't have any permission from the B'desh government. India should be thankful that these illegal Indian workers are not warned or sent to jail by the B'deshi governments."

A fresh story from Dhaka reveals that the Indian Border Force killed two B'deshi youths and took away their bodies in a fresh firing incident, despite a repeated commitment from the Indian side not to use lethal weapons along with border areas.

B'deshi Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal told the Parliament in July last year that the Border Security Force (BSF) had killed a total of 294 B'deshi nationals in the last ten years. This speaks to why Bangladesh has a hatred for India. This is not all. The Indian hatred in yet another South Asian nation has just begun.

This July the Maldivians came to their senses and have retaliated against India as much as they could.

The Maldivian hatred against India:

Streets in Male reverberated with sounds like "Go back India…go back India… Go back India!

The hashtag “India Out” is still trending on Twitter in the Maldives as of July 26, the Maldives’ Independence Day, said international media sources.

Better late than never, the island people came to their senses and noticed that India was just a fraudulent country and that India was a rogue nation that must be kept at a comfortable distance.

Writes Balachanader Palanisamy for the Diplomat, July 26, that one Maldivian national Ahmed Azaan who is the co-founder of Maldivian online news outlet Dhiyares, the “India Out” campaign is a call for the removal of the Indian military from the Maldives. Azaan says further, “It is not a call to cut off diplomatic and trade relations with India”. Azzan however demands that his country, the Maldives, “should be able to forge ties with India without undermining our sovereignty.”

The Maldivians including Azzan opine, "India’s military presence in the Maldives is equivalent to what he takes as "a loss of the Maldivian sovereignty" which was unacceptable to the Maldivian population. The hatred is so intense that Indian diplomats based in Male have hinted to the government to provide the highest security so that they could save their lives.

The President of the Maldives is Ibrahim Mohamed Solih who is taken as the political shadow of Prime Minister Modi. The rest you conclude yourself.

President Solih is no less than our own KP Oli, SB. Deuba, Prachanda and the presumed Christian world chief in Nepal, Madhav Kumar Nepal.

And now Pakistan:

Pakistan is the declared enemy of India and vice versa. If one listens to what the DG ISPR, spokesman of Pakistan Army Babar Ifthikhar said, August 27, it becomes clear as to what India had been doing being in Afghanistan.

General Babar authentically maintains that India was in Afghanistan only to make Pakistan unstable and create chaos and panic in Pakistan through the use of spies of the sort of Kul Bhusan Yadavs and the likes.

“Ever since the Soviets invaded, followed up by the Afghan jihad, then the civil war, and then the war on terror in the last two decades, Pakistan has been continuously a victim of this, 86000 plus lives lost, 152 billion dollars of losses incurred", Gen. Babar summed up.

Afghanistan: Indian PM Modi talked with Vladimir Putin on Afghanistan, August 24, appealing to him to include India in Afghan affairs. Notably, India stands isolated.

Writes M. K. Bhadrakumar, August 29, that the "desperation to clutch at any straw stems out of the complete breakdown of India’s Afghan policy. The government’s narrative on Afghanistan stands exposed as deeply flawed.

He adds, "Moscow takes a “de-hyphenated” approach toward relations with India and Pakistan. In the Russian calculus, Pakistan figures as a serious partner with the potential to help advance some of Russia’s core interests in the Eurasian region in a way that India never can or will, given its quasi-alliance with the US.

The writer claims that India's proximity with the US in the Quad is what distances Russia from India. But yet India, as it is in its gene, will try to assist those forces inside Afghanistan who were against the Taliban(s) rise in the country after the US forces pull out. That's all.