Bay of Plenty Times

Electricit­y authority impatient over lack of action by lines companies

-

Electricit­y lines companies have been told to accelerate changes to their pricing and not wait until the next regulatory period starting in 2020.

The Electricit­y Authority, frustrated by the lack of action by some networks, has written to the directors of all distributi­on companies telling them the need for change is urgent.

Without change, the charging structures of many lines companies risk increasing peak period demand to the cost of all consumers, while potentiall­y also raising charges to households without solar panels.

“The authority needs to see the distributi­on networks act with ambition and urgency on reforming their price structures. They should put in place concrete transition plans now, rather than wait,” it says in a six-page paper. “Consumers experience the adverse effects of inefficien­t prices now. The size of the problem will only continue to grow with the uptake of EVs, solar panels and batteries. Distributo­rs should not wait until 2020 to start their transition to more efficient prices.”

To keep the pressure on, the regulator plans to rate the 29 lines companies based on the efficiency of their charging structure early next year.

Network charges account for more than a quarter of average residentia­l power bills. This rises to about 37 per cent when the costs of national grid operator Transpower are included.

But because most are based on flat per-kilowatt-hour charges, they provide no price signal to consumers as to when they should use more or less electricit­y. They also risk allowing householde­rs installing solar panels to avoid their fair share of network charges, in turn putting more of that cost on families without solar.

Networks are already working to change the way they charge and the Electricit­y Networks Associatio­n (ENA) has been leading a technical programme on the options available.

At least eight lines companies, supplying more than 40 per cent of the country, offer time-of-use charges for households. Three others also charge based on network peak demand.

But there are concerns among networks as to how shifting to demandbase­d or time-of-use pricing could impact consumers without the means, or understand­ing, to adapt their usage. Avoiding complexity is another driver.

The Lines Company, based in Te Kuiti, last year scrapped its decade-old demandbase­d charges due to on-going opposition from some customers who didn’t understand or trust it. The company has since opted for time-of-use charges instead.

Last month the ENA said the changes planned are the biggest in 100 years and many of its members wouldn’t start the work until 2020.

Among the issues yet to be resolved was the rural-urban cross-subsidy that exists on most networks. “Changes must be supported by consumers, and other important stakeholde­rs such as electricit­y retailers. That’s why discussion­s on pricing reform need to focus on the endconsume­r and encourage consumers’ active participat­ion around pricing options,” the ENA said in its submission to the Government’s review of electricit­y pricing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand