Court date set in bid to recoup $20m over car park
Council’s case be heard in the High Court in February
Acourt date has been set in Tauranga City Council’s bid to recover more than $20 million of ratepayer money for the beleaguered Harington St parking building.
The Harington Transport Hub in the central city had already cost $19m when construction was abandoned in September 2019 over alleged seismic design issues. Costs to the council carried on, at $4000 a day.
A court date has been set for February, more than two years after the council lodged proceedings in October 2020 seeking to recover costs from the building’s designers.
The intention was to recover “as much as possible” of the $20.5m ploughed into the project, a previous statement from the council said.
Work has begun to demolish the structure and build a multimilliondollar hotel and car park in its place.
Council general manager infrastructure Nic Johansson told Local Democracy Reporting the hearing of “separate questions” was set to start on February 13 in the High Court. Five days have been allocated. The council would not confirm who the legal action was against.
LDR found from the court that the action is against the structural engineering company contracted to design the building, Harrison Grierson.
Harrison Grierson declined to comment because “the matter is the subject of litigation”.
The proceedings are also against other parties neither the council nor the court would name.
LDR has applied for the court documents and is awaiting a decision on whether they will be released.
As well as litigation, the council lodged official complaints with NZ’S professional body for engineers, seeking action against three unnamed people in December 2020.
“There are disciplinary proceedings sought through Engineering New Zealand [ENZ] against the structural engineers involved with, and approving the design,” said Johansson.
ENZ general manager Justin Brownlie said the investigation was progressing and it was “unlikely further information will be made public this year”.
When asked if this timeframe was typical for complaints of this nature, he said: “Complaints which are technically complex and/or involve multiple parties can take some time.
“Taking that time is important to ensure a good process where all parties are given a fair and reasonable opportunity to present their account of what happened.”
Only decisions about complaints upheld by a disciplinary committee would be made public, said Brownlie.
If the complaints were upheld, penalties included removing or suspending the engineers’ registration and/or their ENZ membership, censuring the engineers, and ordering them to pay a fine not exceeding $5000, according to the ENZ website.
The disciplinary committee can also order an engineer to contribute to the inquiry costs and be named.
The building’s demise
Construction of the $29m Harington Transport Hub, set to be a nine-storey building with 550 car parks, began in June 2018.
In March 2019 the structure was
20m high when a beam twisted during a concrete pour. Between June and July 2019 alleged seismic design problems were revealed.
A high-level structural review by engineering company Holmes Consulting showed floor, column and bracing weaknesses.
This included foundations so thin they needed a further 300 tonnes of reinforcing steel and 140 truckloads of concrete, as well as basement wall strengthening to all four corners and eight columns that needed destroying using hydro jets, while propping up the floors above.
In September 2019 building was halted and later that year work began on a remedial strengthening design.
The mass of concrete and steel framing would remain untouched for close to three years.
By May 2020 the construction company Watts and Hughes, engineering firm Aurecon and Harrison Grierson could not agree on a strengthening design, according to documents obtained from council.
In June 2020 a closed-door meeting was held with the mayor and councillors to decide the hub’s fate.
A decision to abandon the project was made because of the “prohibitive cost” of remediation.
An estimate to demolish the building was $26.5m, structural remediation would have cost $55.4m, and demolition and rebuild was costed at $64.4m, according to a report from TSA Project Management.
At the time mayor Tenby Powell said: “As unpalatable as it is to abandon a project which has already cost $19m, our expert advice makes it clear that the completion options available to us would simply be sending good money after bad.”
Nearly a year later, in March 2021 the site was sold for $1 to Waibop (Hamilton) Limited — a subsidiary of the original construction company Watts and Hughes.
The agreement meant the new owner would take responsibility for the property and existing structure.
Unused materials and structural steel purchased for use in the building, plus a negotiated settlement for the cancellation of the construction contract, resulted in a final payment to the council of $200,000.
A fresh start
The multimillion-dollar, 14-storey hotel and car park with 200 public parking spaces will be built on the site by Watts and Hughes.
TCC granted a $4m building consent for the car park’s foundation and structural works in September.
Watts and Hughes managing director Craig Watts said its completion was expected by October next year.
Watts said they were working with a “preferred hotelier” and once that agreement was unconditional, construction drawings for the hotel would “commence immediately”.
“Once we get through the car park, we hope we can carry on with the actual hotel construction.”
The “preferred hotelier” was 4.5 stars, which Watts believed “Tauranga needs badly”.
Council commissioner Stephen Selwood said the council welcomed Watts and Hughes’ plans to redevelop the site and ensure it provided public car parking as well as parking for future users of the building.
“We also note that the commercial uses planned for the structure on this site will have significantly changed the financial viability of the development, compared with the situation the council faced when it reached a decision that it was not viable to remediate the building’s seismic design deficiencies.”
— Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.