Cellphone bans: How they work globally

At the start of the week, students were told to put their phones away in class, as the Government’s cellphone ban took effect across the country. The Herald can reveal the advice the Ministry of Education gave the Government over the policy, and how the tactic has played out across the Tasman and beyond. Azaria Howell reports

What is New Zealand’s school cellphone ban?

As year new was “phones already some requirement, were April Luxon “ban help every National the officially ban lift kicked cellphone made 29. schools child”. announced second achievement being away on official cellphones leader off, though put before rolled term for use the into the National from Christopher at Government’s of out the regulations and day” schools force. the in Monday, across mandatory schools support school plan would The to was

the break Students course grounds their The Some school phones. periods or policy are exemptions who a day, visit also applies are and including outside not on lunch allowed a are throughout school school times. allowed. during to use Schools students for support health task are or to reasons, a access required in specific the classroom. phones learning educationrelated to allow if needed Those circumstances”, parents, from Ministry the with may rule, of Education “special also according like be teenage made guidelines. to exempt the

tasked enforce Individual with and deciding manage schools the how have cellphone to been restrictions Ministry there are of no Education themselves. specific required has The noted processes to be handed around in, kept requiring in bags, phones kept in now lockers, relatively or put commonplace in a “phone jail”, tactic a across There classrooms. are no specific mandatory rules rules around should entail. what a breach of the

consider Schools “scheduling have been a asked review to of the rules to consider if they need to be adjusted to address any emerging challenges”, according to official documents from the ministry.

How many other countries have introduced similar bans? Have they been effective?

The Ministry of Education looked across the world as it provided its official advice to Cabinet. Briefing notes describe policies, enforcement initiatives and the effectiveness of separate bans in Australian states and across Asia and Europe.

A cellphone ban in Britain is deemed “not mandatory” by New Zealand’s Ministry of Education. In the UK, it is currently up to head teachers to decide whether or not a phone ban should be put in place. Just weeks prior to the New Zealand general election, British Education Secretary Gillian Keegan “threatened” to pass legislation to ban mobile phones in schools if schools failed to implement new guidance, the briefing notes from the Ministry of Education said. Keegan suggested phones were a distraction and used for bullying.

A study from the London School of Economics, looking at 91 UK high schools in 2015, found student performance improved by 6.41 per cent after a ban — corresponding to an extra working week in the school year.

Any gains from a potential ban are wiped away if there is a lack of compliance in the policy.

Advice from New Zealand’s Ministry of Education disputes this. In an academic review of policies across jurisdictions, the agency found “there is little research on the relationship between the use of mobile phones and bullying in schools”. The ministry estimates around 20 per cent of bullying cases happen via online-based means.

The documents, seen by NZME under the Official Information Act, suggest banning mobile phones has the “potential” to reduce bullying in intermediate-school-aged children.

According to a review by the New South Wales Government in Australia, there was “no credible, peer-reviewed literature about the extent to which the presence of mobile phones in recess and lunchtime increases the incidents of cyber bullying”. It was said to be difficult to determine the extent to which mobile phone access in schools impacts and influences cyber bullying, as students can still access their phones outside of school hours under the policy.

A “digital technology” policy came into force in public schools in New South Wales in 2020, though further restrictions banning mobile phones for high school students came into force in April 2023.

The policy served as an election promise from current Premier, Chris Minns.

In New South Wales, a blanket ban applies during class, recess and lunchtimes, for smartphones, smartwatches, tablets, laptops and other devices that can connect to the internet. Students are allowed to carry their phones when travelling to and from school and parents and caregivers can request an exemption from parts of the policy, or the entire thing.

In Queensland, a mandatory ban came into force at the start of the first term, applying to all school hours, including breaks.

Principals have been given the authority to determine how mobile phones and smartwatches under the ban will be stored during the day.

Further research cited by the Ministry of Education, from the University of Queensland, said there was a “lack of agreement as to the efficacy of banning mobile devices at school as a universal strategy to reduce cyber bullying”.

In Western Australia, mobile phones are barred across public schools. Kids up to Year 6 who decide to bring a phone to school must have it stored with teachers for the entire day, with students in Years 7 to 12 told to keep their phone off and out of sight until the end of school.

The same exemptions in Western Australia are in force in New Zealand and under the policy in the Australian state, breaches are responded to with a “multitiered system”.

Many Australian schools have said the distracting element of phones was a catalyst behind the ban.

Despite the lack of confidence from Australia in terms of a phone ban being effective for bullying, the ministry’s advice also cites a Spanish study which found banning mobile phones at schools reduced bullying among teenagers.

Dr Joanne Orlando from the University of Western Sydney disagrees the ban would do anything to combat bullying. Orlando said in-person bullying continues to be more prevalent than cyber bullying, “so removing a device for six hours a day will not stop the bullying.”

The advice wasn’t all dismissive of the policy’s effectiveness, with proof mobile phones had a negative impact on learning in 14 countries, according to a Unesco (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) study cited in briefings.

In Norway, a similar policy of banning smartphones in the classroom in middle schools, the equivalent of intermediate, showed following the policies, students saw increased students’ grade point average.

Students in France over the age of 15 are mostly required to keep their phones off during the school day.

Government warned ban here ‘may not be warranted’

The Ministry of Education appeared to warn the Government to tread carefully and make the right decisions. “One issue is whether the ban should just be for mobile phones or for other mobile devices,” official advice read.

Documents suggest a legislative mandatory ban “may not be warranted,” with comment from Unesco stating “working with technology in schools, and the accompanying risks, may require something more than banning”.

Policymakers were urged to make policies clear around what is and what is not permitted in schools, with more clarity required for the role new technologies can play in schools. Alarm bells appeared to be raised around smartwatches.

The Ministry of Education had not considered banning cellphones in classrooms prior to the Government’s announcements.

In a statement, Education Minister Erica Stanford said the policy has been “overwhelmingly successful” so far.

“Principals have been writing to me every day, telling me how wonderful it is to hear the noise in the playground. Librarians are telling me kids are taking books out of the library more often. Students themselves are telling us that they don’t have the anxiety of having to check their phone every five minutes for messages that are coming in,” Stanford said.

The minister added that she believes the policy has been popular and the schools implementing the ban in term two will see the benefits.