Children’s welfare too important to get wrong
OPINION: Hard-working children’s commissioners have over the years highlighted serious issues and contributed to lasting change. Now there is a proposed law change to axe the commissioner and replace them with a board with less powers. Why? An MP from each side of the House gives their views. .
health, education, and care and protection. The system as a whole needs to operate effectively if we’re to make New Zealand the best place in the world to be a child.
The current Children’s Commissioner has said, ‘‘The board model is good. It brings in people from the community; more than just a commissioner thinking about things. There’s a real obligation to focus on Te Tiriti and to involve iwi, community organisations and the like.’’
Indeed, the Children and Young People’s Commission will be governed by a board that reflects the diverse skills and experience required to advocate on a broad range of issues.
It will also be more focussed. Currently, the Children’s Commissioner has key functions to monitor Oranga Tamariki residences and community services, investigate decisions, report on children’s issues, and advocate for children generally.
Proposed legislation shifts the
Children’s Commissioner role from complaints monitoring to more systemic advocacy. It means we don’t have one organisation spread thinly across all those important functions, but we resource each separately.
The Government is setting a new direction for our care and protection system; one that sees Oranga Tamariki work in true partnership with communities.
The Children and Young People’s Commission will play a big role in Oranga Tamariki oversight. I know independent board members will have the mana to hold the Government to account.
Government. Within the new Oversight of Oranga Tamariki System and Children and Young People’s Commission Bill, it is unclear whether or not some parts of the new Commission will be separate from the Government or its departments. National has supported the Bill in principle, through to the Select Committee stage, and we will look forward to seeing submissions from the public and professionals in the area.
But one thing is clear, as the Bill passes through the various legislative processes, National will be pushing to ensure that the Commission retains its distance from the Government of the day so that it can best serve children.
A second concern I have with a new Commission is that it could well be stacked with bureaucrats from Wellington who have little understanding of what goes on in the lives of vulnerable children.
When we are dealing with such a serious situation like the wellbeing of children, we can ill-afford to add layers and layers of bureaucracy for the sake of it. Yes, the new Commission needs to lay out what the issues are facing children, but they also need to come up with solutions to solve them.
The fact of the matter is, the welfare of our children is far too important to get wrong. We need a strong, unconstrained voice who can fight for children who are unable to do so for themselves. To have that voice, we need an entity who has the courage and the determination to make lasting changes in the lives of children in New Zealand, the same way that previous Children’s Commissioners have.