Debate on $260k dam debt
Water Holdings wants council to defer owed fees
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council is set to decide if it should allow a company trying to revive large-scale water storage in Central Hawke’s Bay to defer the $260,000 in fees it owes.
Water Holdings Hawke’s Bay now holds the consents for the $330 million Ruataniwha water storage scheme, which was canned in 2018, despite the $20m of planning and consenting costs racked up by Hawke’s Bay Regional Council.
The company got the consents for $100,000 but is required to pay Section 36 freshwater science charges on them annually.
It hasn’t done so for the past two years, and now owes the council $259,805, with another charge of more than $150,000 due by March 2023.
Water Holdings Hawke’s Bay has requested a deferral of its charges until such time as the consents can be exercised, which will be considered at a council meeting on Wednesday.
The farmers behind the company say the costs will be paid back to the council eventually, and community will reap the added benefits of having the best option for water security in the region, if their water storage plans are successful.
A Hawke’s Bay Regional Council spokeswoman said there would be no extra cost for ratepayers no matter what option is chosen at Wednesday’s meeting. However, if the consents lapse, some or all the funds owed cannot be recovered or remission of future charges is proposed, then other consent holders across the region could expect up to 17 per cent increases to their fees in the future as the council spreads the large cost of science charges.
Hugh Ritchie, one of the directors for Water Holdings Hawke’s Bay, said no better alternative strategies for providing workable environmental flow to the river and meeting current and future needs for water on the scale required have been brought to the table.
Ritchie said the annual science charges were $48,000 when the consents were first purchased and the group could not have known they would more than triple in a few years.
The way the charges were calculated by the council changed in June 2021 and the new methodology has led to significantly higher costs for Water Holdings’ consents.
“We haven’t said we won’t pay for them, but we are saying if this thing gets across the line we’ll capitalise those fees and actually pay them out of the development of the dam.”
He was frustrated that critics of Water Holdings Hawke’s Bay and their Makaroro storage scheme portrayed those behind it as “water barons” seeking profit.
“There wasn’t any intent in any conversation or paper to make this a money-making scheme for us, it is purely to get a secure and sustainable water resource for Central Hawke’s Bay and the wider Hawke’s Bay.”
Tim Gilbertson, Water Holdings Hawke’s Bay’s largest shareholder, said he and the others would have walked away by now if the venture was for-profit.
He said the region would be past the point of no return if greater water security moves weren’t made soon.
Neil Kirton, a Hawke’s Bay regional councillor seeking re-election, said deferring the fees would severely compromise the integrity of HBRC’s fees and charges policies.
“The implications are that other consent holders could equally claim they are not in a position to exercise their consents and also should have these remitted,” Kirton said.
If an application to extend the consents to 2030 is granted, the annual fee could continue to accrue for the eight years, up to $1.48 million.