Victory in top court for teens
Supreme Court rules in favour of lowered voting age
An appeal to lower the voting age to 16 has been accepted by the country’s highest court — but only Parliament can decide if the law will change. In the Supreme Court, Justice Ellen France and Justice Mark O’Regan yesterday ruled a decision by the Court of Appeal to decline the case of the Make it 16 group be set aside.
Justice France told the court it was inconsistent with the Bill of Rights not to allow 16-year-olds to vote, and the decision of the Court of Appeal was overturned.
There were tears from members of the Make it 16 group in court, who have been campaigning for years to have the age lowered.
Justice France said not allowing 16 year olds to vote was “inconsistent with the Bill of Rights to be free from discrimination on the basis of age”.
Outside the court, members of Make it 16 were thrilled by the decision.
“This is history,” said co-director Caeden Tipler.
A recent law change from Parliament means that any declaration of inconsistency from the courts is put up for special debate.
Tipler said that they are confident the law will change.
“There is a formal process for Parliament to look into the declaration of inconsistency and we are very optimistic that once Parliament reviews the decision they will see that lowering the voting age is the right thing to do.
“Although we’re celebrating we still have a lot of mahi to do.”
The decision is being celebrated by Green MP Golriz Gharaman, who said it was now time for Parliament to “do what’s right to strengthen our democracy”.
Also overjoyed with the decision was Julie Anne Genter, another Green MP who said she was moved to tears by the decision.
“I remember being 16 in 1996, passionate about many issues, working and paying taxes, wanting to vote. Well done to all those who have campaigned and fought for this.”
However, National leader Christopher Luxon was not as happy, saying his party would not back moves to lower the voting age to 16.
“It’s not something that we support, ultimately you have to draw the line somewhere and we are comfortable with the line being 18.”
The decision follows from one in the Court of Appeal in 2021, which found there was age discrimination and the Government couldn’t justify that discrimination.
A declaration of inconsistency was declined, however, on the grounds that it was a “quintessentially political” issue. Make it 16 was granted leave for its case to be heard in the Supreme Court in April after the group failed its efforts to have the voting age lowered in the High Court and Court of Appeal in 2020 and 2021.
Make it 16 argues its case is a human rights issue.
The group claims preventing 16 and 17 year olds from voting is “unjustified age discrimination”, inconsistent with the Bill of Rights.
In the High Court in 2020, the judge found the voting age restrictions were reasonable limitations on the right to be free from age discrimination under section 5 of the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court granted leave to answer the question of whether the Court of Appeal was right to dismiss the case. The group, formed in July 2019 by youth activists above and below voting age, is advocating for “more people’s voices to count in our democracy”, according to their website.
I remember being 16 in 1996, passionate about many issues, working and paying taxes, wanting to vote.
Julie Anne Genter